Hello 'Simmel'!
>> I already asked this question, but the answers weren't of any use for
me
>> I looked @ this apt-cache and apt-proxy stuff and it's far too much.
>I personally think the answers were well suited _for the question you
>asked_.
As I said before, I don't go into the Dusseldo
Hello 'Simmel'!
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 03:06:09PM +0100, Simmel wrote:
> I already asked this question, but the answers weren't of any use for me
> I looked @ this apt-cache and apt-proxy stuff and it's far too much.
I personally think the answers were well suited _for the question you
asked
Hi List,
I already asked this question, but the answers weren't of any use for me
I looked @ this apt-cache and apt-proxy stuff and it's far too much.
I don't need to drive a Ferrari to get some cigarettes from the corner, if a
bicycle will do the job!
Okay I'll go back to the start and ask m
On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 08:37:02AM -0500 or thereabouts, Jim Lynch wrote:
> OK, it's working again. I found ifup and /etc/interfaces.
>
> But why am I still getting all of the unresolved symbols with modules?
>
reason is when you didn't rename /var/lib/modules/2.2.x to
/var/lib/modules/2.2.x-o
OK, it's working again. I found ifup and /etc/interfaces.
But why am I still getting all of the unresolved symbols with modules?
During the make menuconfig step I selected a bunch of stuff as modules
but I'm having a hard time figuring out what the names of some of them
are. Is there a way to
Well, I gave up, trashed the disk and installed 2.2 from scratch. Now
I've been installing/configuring Linux since 0.12. This release really
takes me back to the good old days. I installed about everything under
the sun including networking but when I look at the
/etc/init.d/networking file, the
6 matches
Mail list logo
