On Mon, Jul 27, 1998 at 08:24:20AM +0200, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
> hmmm maybe i'd mount /home as noexec too... users could hate it cause it
> would prevent from using scripts and e.g. links to ssh (like
> fantomas.fantomas.sk. -> /usr/bin/ssh which would call ssh to
> fantomas.fantomas.sk) bu
-> there's one other small cosideration that I can think of. While I don't
-> do this, I know some people keep scripts/binaries for sysadmin use in
-> /root. If any of these are suid then you'll have a problem if you mount
-> /home as nosuid (something that I do). I sometimes have an suid progra
there's one other small cosideration that I can think of. While I don't
do this, I know some people keep scripts/binaries for sysadmin use in
/root. If any of these are suid then you'll have a problem if you mount
/home as nosuid (something that I do). I sometimes have an suid program
in /root
On: Sun, 26 Jul 1998 10:43:55 +0800 Jieyao writes:
>
> I have one partition which I had mounted as /home. I figured that
> since this is gonna store user information and files, I might as
> well put the root home there too. So I created /home/root and
> change /root to a symbolic link to /home/
I have one partition which I had mounted as /home.
I figured that since this is gonna store user information and files, I might as
well
put the root home there too.
So I created /home/root and change /root to a symbolic link to /home/root
Is there any security risk in doing this?
One problem th
5 matches
Mail list logo
