Hello
Basajaun (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> [...]
> One friend of mine runs amaroK 1.2 on Slackware 10.1, and it barely
> crashes on him (although it does crash). If these crashes are a
> "feature" of the amaroK package, I am amazed by the fact that it is
> included in a distribution (Sarge) th
Hi all,
I am running Debian Sarge with kernel 2.6.8-2-686. When I discovered
amaroK, it was version 1.1 in Sarge, and 1.2 in Sid (I think). Although
1.2 has some nice features that 1.1 does not have, I waited until 1.2
eventually made it to Sarge (at present the same version of amaroK is
in both S
2 matches
Mail list logo