On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 15:10:49 -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> > Unless I'm mistaken, KDE2 will be included in Debian's site because of
> > all the licensing changes
>
> You are probably mistaken. While there is a license change in that KDE2 uses
>
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 15:10:49 -0500, Bart Szyszka wrote:
> Unless I'm mistaken, KDE2 will be included in Debian's site because of
> all the licensing changes
You are probably mistaken. While there is a license change in that KDE2 uses
Qt2 which unlike Qt1 which KDE1 uses is free, the license un
> BTW, are there .debs for KDE in Debian? I tried GNOME,
> but it wasn't really my kind of desktop, and KDE looks
> good.
Yep, take a look at:
http://kde.tdyc.com
Unless I'm mistaken, KDE2 will be included in Debian's site because of
all the licensing changes, but for noe kde.tdyc.com is where y
Also what about kedit part of KDE. It opens more than
one file simultaneously.
BTW, are there .debs for KDE in Debian? I tried GNOME,
but it wasn't really my kind of desktop, and KDE looks
good.
Thanks,
Jonathan Nieder
__
Get Your Private,
- Original Message -
From: Sean Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Adam Shand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Debian User List
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2000 7:28 AM
Subject: Re: alternatives to gnotepad+
>
Hi
I don't know anything about gnotepad+.
But would vile(xvile
> VIM is pretty easy to use ... and gVIM, the graphical interface to VIM
> is rather nice looking I think.
yeah ... i can do that, but it's not quite what i had in mind. i did
however just check the gedit homepage and it turns out that the debian
package is quite out of date and that there are a
> nedit would work but it won't allow multiple files to be open within one
> window. gnotepad+ and gedit are exactly what i want but buggy enough to
> not be very annoying to use (and c ain't my forte so i can't "use the
> source" unfortunately :-( ).
VIM is pretty easy to use ... and gVIM, the g
> There's a plethora of editors out there. Ever tried XEmacs? XEmacs has
> pull-down menus, so you don't really have to memorize all the key
> combinations, and most importantly has very nice syntax highlighting
> features.
emacs is way more then i need. all i want is a simple gui based text edi
On Fri, Mar 17, 2000 at 11:13:17AM -0900, Adam Shand generated a stream of 1s
and 0s:
>
> hey.
>
> i've been a loyal user of gnotepad+ for quite a while but it seems to be
> getting buggier and buggier (and more and more features that i don't
> need). what i like about it is that it's one edito
Adam Shand wrote:
>
> hey.
> so ... does anyone else out there know of an alternative? the simpler the
> better so long as it has multiple tabls (or a similar feature) to easily
> switch between files.
I have long used gnotepad+ also, but lately, due to the reasons you have
offered, I have used
> I have long used gnotepad+ also, but lately, due to the reasons you have
> offered, I have used gxedit. It seems to be about at the point of
> functionality that gnotepad+ used to be when I thought it was so handy.
> You would have to try it yourself to see if it suited you. Gedit seems
> like i
hey.
i've been a loyal user of gnotepad+ for quite a while but it seems to be
getting buggier and buggier (and more and more features that i don't
need). what i like about it is that it's one editor program with a bunch of
tabs for multiple open documents so you can switch between them. i
typic
12 matches
Mail list logo
