Re: RE: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-11-16 Thread Andrei Popescu
On Mi, 16 nov 11, 12:11:55, Selim T. Erdogan wrote: > > A few minutes ago I was looking at the package iw in sid and saw that it > says "Replaces: aircrack-ng (<< 1:1.0~rc2-1)". I don't really know > anything about either package and iw seems not ready yet, but I thought > sharing this info ca

Re: RE: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-11-16 Thread Selim T. Erdogan
(I ran into this info a few minutes after I'd deleted the original message so I found the message on the archive on the web and tried to construct header fields to match. Crossing my fingers.) > (stuff about aircrack-ng being removed from debian and pyrit being > offered as an alternative. stu

RE: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-11-16 Thread Mike Viau
> On Sat, 22 Oct 2011 00:58:32 + wrote: > > > Celejar gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:02:48 +0100 > > Brian cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > > > On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > > > > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-21 Thread UncleVom
Celejar gmail.com> writes: > > On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:02:48 +0100 > Brian cityscape.co.uk> wrote: > > > On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > > > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the justification > > > for the request for removal is that "Better alte

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-18 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 15:39:15 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:23:13 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:30:27 + (UTC) Camaleón > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > >> > >> > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, an

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-18 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:23:13 -0400, Celejar wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:30:27 + (UTC) Camaleón > wrote: > >> On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: >> >> > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the >> > justification for the request for removal is that "Bette

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-17 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 00:02:48 +0100 Brian wrote: > On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the justification > > for the request for removal is that "Better alternatives exist.": > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-17 Thread Brian
On Mon 17 Oct 2011 at 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the justification > for the request for removal is that "Better alternatives exist.": > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642934 The reason for its removal appears to be

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-17 Thread Celejar
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:30:27 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > > > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the justification > > for the request for removal is that "Better alternatives exist.": > > > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bi

Re: alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-17 Thread Camaleón
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 15:22:57 -0400, Celejar wrote: > aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the justification > for the request for removal is that "Better alternatives exist.": > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642934 > > I have no idea what these alternatives

alternatives to aircrack-ng

2011-10-17 Thread Celejar
aircrack-ng has been removed from Debian, and part of the justification for the request for removal is that "Better alternatives exist.": http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642934 I have no idea what these alternatives might be, and I have been unable to find anything remotely as ca