* Rodolfo Medina [2017-02-28 13:24 +]:
> Hi.
>
> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>
> No candidate version found for alsa-base
alsa-base has been removed from distribution [0]. It's only purpose was
to clean old conffiles.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
Rodolfo Medina writes:
> Shin Ice writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>>>
>>> No candidate version found for alsa-base
Also:
No can
Shin Ice writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
>> Hi.
>>
>> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>>
>> No candidate version found for alsa-base
>>
>
> interesting, alsa-base is availlable on sid on version 1.0.27+
Hi,
Am 28.02.17 um 14:24 schrieb Rodolfo Medina:
> Hi.
>
> I want to install alsa-base but get:
>
> No candidate version found for alsa-base
>
interesting, alsa-base is availlable on sid on version 1.0.27+1.
how are you trying to install it? did you made an update before
Hi.
I want to install alsa-base but get:
No candidate version found for alsa-base
, although the pacakage seems to exist. My sources.list:
# stable
#deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ stable main
#deb-src http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/ stable main
# unstable
deb http://ftp.uk.debian.org
On Mi, 05 sep 12, 01:49:05, lee wrote:
>
> > For example if you watch DVD's on your computer you will need
> > libdvdcss2 which isn't available in Debian.
>
> Yeah what's the replacement for that?
There is none that I know of.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users an
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:39:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Chris Bannister writes:
>> > Read this:
>> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
>> >
>> > Also, just found this:
>> > http://blogs.dailynews.com/click/2012/06/debian-project-leader-stefano.html
>>
>> That
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:29:20PM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 05 sep 12, 00:04:24, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
> >
> > > And how about the ones that aren't available in Debian?
> >
> > You can build them yourself using the build depen
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 03:39:59PM +0200, lee wrote:
> Chris Bannister writes:
> > Read this:
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
> >
> > Also, just found this:
> > http://blogs.dailynews.com/click/2012/06/debian-project-leader-stefano.html
>
> That's interesting --- the question is w
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
>> When they are only different in version, then what is bad about having
>> packages from Debian-multimedia, and why should I remove them?
>
> Read this:
> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
>
> Also, just fo
On Mi, 05 sep 12, 00:04:24, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > And how about the ones that aren't available in Debian?
>
> You can build them yourself using the build dependencies from Debian.
> If you go that route then that is when you'll need th
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 07:31:34AM +0200, lee wrote:
> When they are only different in version, then what is bad about having
> packages from Debian-multimedia, and why should I remove them?
Read this:
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMultimedia/FAQ
Also, just found this:
http://blogs.dailynews.com/c
Camaleón writes:
> On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:20:35 +0200, lee wrote:
>> In the meantime, I have a working system without having to worry about
>> keeping track of self-installed software and dependency problems that
>> might arise from it. Just don't circumvent the package management --- I
>> tried
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Lu, 03 sep 12, 18:57:26, lee wrote:
>> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>>
>> > This is your responsibility as the administrator of your system.
>> > There are various methods to do it, it all depends on preferences.
>>
>> Interesting, which methods are there?
>
> Since you
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Lu, 03 sep 12, 16:22:25, lee wrote:
>>
>> Ok, how do I find out which packages from Debian-MM are actually
>> installed and what their Debian-MM-team replacements are?
>
> aptitude search ~S~i~OMultimedia
>
> Will show you which packages you have from deb-multimed
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 16:22:25, lee wrote:
>
> Ok, how do I find out which packages from Debian-MM are actually
> installed and what their Debian-MM-team replacements are?
aptitude search ~S~i~OMultimedia
Will show you which packages you have from deb-multimedia.org. However,
the Debian replace
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 17:45:11, Camaleón wrote:
>
> I think you still don't understand what Debian releases are for: you
> simply can't have the four branches (stable/testing/sid/experimental)
> enabled by default and wait for the updater do its job "automagically". I
> have little experience with
On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:20:35 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
(...)
>>> What's wrong with it? Aptitude installs packages from testing by
>>> default and installs packages from unstable or experimental when I
>>> tell it to, which is what I want.
>>
>> Nothing wrong "per se" but when using s
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 18:57:26, lee wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> > This is your responsibility as the administrator of your system.
> > There are various methods to do it, it all depends on preferences.
>
> Interesting, which methods are there?
Since you only install select packages from un
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Lu, 03 sep 12, 15:11:55, lee wrote:
>> I wish there was a good way to keep track of all these changes ... The
>> admin would enter why some change was performed, and the package
>
> This is your responsibility as the administrator of your system. There
> are various m
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:31:02PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> packages from these when needed? And if I removed Debian multimedia, I
>> would miss a lot of packages.
>
> You might be suprised. The Debian Multimedia team is constantly
> improving Debian's multimedia support.
Camaleón writes:
> On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 19:31:02 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental
because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble
ones are. I would want to keep those until testing
On Lu, 03 sep 12, 15:11:55, lee wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> > On Du, 02 sep 12, 16:42:30, lee wrote:
> >> downgrade. I'm surprised that there are so many packages from unstable
> >> installed, though. Yet that will fix itself over time when the packages
> >> now in unstable make it into t
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 19:31:02 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
>>> Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental
>>> because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble
>>> ones are. I would want to keep those until testing catches up.
>>
>> Then this
t to figure out what needed to be done for that while it
should have been a simple and trivial thing to do.
For now, I removed linux-sound-base which triggered the removal of
alsa-base, upgraded the packages that were pending and re-installed
alsa-base. Perhaps I still have sound after th
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 07:31:02PM +0200, lee wrote:
> packages from these when needed? And if I removed Debian multimedia, I
> would miss a lot of packages.
You might be suprised. The Debian Multimedia team is constantly
improving Debian's multimedia support.
--
"If you're not careful, the new
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:06:30PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:02 +0200
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> > I experienced no issues with the dist-upgrade.
>
> In my troubles with that I'm sure they installed alsa-base with everything
> muted
On Du, 02 sep 12, 16:42:30, lee wrote:
> The Wanderer writes:
> >
> > No. sid is the permanent name of *un*stable. Current stable is named
> > squeeze.
>
> Ah ok --- I'm bad with remembering names and stopped caring about how
> the releases are called a long time ago. It would explain the attemp
Camaleón writes:
>> Some packages currently installed may be from unstable or experimental
>> because I needed more recent versions of them --- IIRC, the mumble ones
>> are. I would want to keep those until testing catches up.
>
> Then this can be the culprit for all your mess unless you had conf
On 9/2/2012 11:49 AM, John Hasler wrote:
The Wanderer writes:
Thus, the newest packages are always in sid. (Or, in some cases,
possibly in experimental; I've never quite gotten the exact function
of experimental figured out.)
The function of Experimental is experimentation. Packages uploaded
The Wanderer writes:
> Thus, the newest packages are always in sid. (Or, in some cases,
> possibly in experimental; I've never quite gotten the exact function
> of experimental figured out.)
The function of Experimental is experimentation. Packages uploaded to
it stay there until removed or super
function of experimental
> figured
> out.)
Hm I thought they travel from experimental through unstable into
testing. All this doesn't seem to cause the dependency problem with
alsa-base I have now ...
--
Debian testing amd64
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r4qk32qx@yun.yagibdah.de
On Sun, 02 Sep 2012 12:24:42 +0200, lee wrote:
> Sid is stable?
Dude... what a question for a user running testing :-)
Sid is the codename for unstable.
> I want to run testing and not stable, and shouldn't the
> packages in testing not be newer than the ones in Sid?
Sid has the most updated
On 09/02/2012 06:24 AM, lee wrote:
Andrei POPESCU writes:
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:44:07, lee wrote:
See below: that would remove linux-sound-base, upgrade 52 packages and
downgrade 148 packages.
I picked a few of the to-be-downgraded packages and all of them were from
sid. Do you want to run
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:44:07, lee wrote:
>>
>> See below: that would remove linux-sound-base, upgrade 52 packages and
>> downgrade 148 packages.
>
> I picked a few of the to-be-downgraded packages and all of them were
> from sid. Do you want to run sid or wheezy?
Sid is
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:44:07, lee wrote:
>
> See below: that would remove linux-sound-base, upgrade 52 packages and
> downgrade 148 packages.
I picked a few of the to-be-downgraded packages and all of them were
from sid. Do you want to run sid or wheezy? There is at least one
(vsftpd) which I don
Mark Allums writes:
> On 9/2/2012 12:44 AM, lee wrote:
>> Camaleón writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
>>>
>>>> Camaleón writes:
>>>
>>>>>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa
Andrei POPESCU writes:
> On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:28:23, lee wrote:
>>
>> ,
>> | lee@yun:~$ aptitude show alsa-base
>> | Paket: alsa-base
>> | Zustand: Installiert
>> | Automatisch installiert: nein
>> | Version: 1.0.23+dfsg-4
>
> At least
On Du, 02 sep 12, 07:28:23, lee wrote:
>
> ,
> | lee@yun:~$ aptitude show alsa-base
> | Paket: alsa-base
> | Zustand: Installiert
> | Automatisch installiert: nein
> | Version: 1.0.23+dfsg-4
At least the .at. mirror has 1.0.25+2+nmu2 for wheezy.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
On 9/2/2012 12:44 AM, lee wrote:
Camaleón writes:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
Camaleón writes:
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
(...)
According to aptitude, alsa-base depends on linux-sound-base and
Camaleón writes:
> On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Camaleón writes:
>
>>>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
>
> (...)
>
>> According to aptitude, alsa-base depends on li
ger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
>>>>>> Camaleón wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (...)
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:50:02 +0200
> Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> > "A towel, it says, is about the most massively useful thing
>
> Exactly Ralf..I'm always wearing a towel instead of my sarong that often goes
> missing. You see it's
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 15:35:19 +0200
lee wrote:
Hello lee,
>The problem came up maybe a week ago and I'm waiting since and still
>have it. It probably won't be fixed ...
I recall reading about your problems. When I performed the upgrade on
my testing system, I was a little apprehensive. Howeve
On 01/09/12 14:35, lee wrote:
Joe writes:
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200
lee wrote:
Camaleón writes:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:56:29 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
(...)
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200, lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
(...)
> According to aptitude, alsa-base depends on linux-sound-base and
> conflicts with linux-sound-base. So
>
>> > (...)
>> >
>> >> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
>> >>>* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the kernel
>> >>>pre-squeeze.
>> >>> (
On Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:38:42 +0200
lee wrote:
> Camaleón writes:
>
> > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:56:29 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
> >> Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > (...)
> >
> >> h
Camaleón writes:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:56:29 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
>> Camaleón wrote:
>
> (...)
>
>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
>>>
On Thu, 30 Aug 2012 19:50:02 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> "A towel, it says, is about the most massively useful thing
Exactly Ralf..I'm always wearing a towel instead of my sarong that often goes
missing. You see it's true, a man who knows where his towel is, is never
exposed.
--
CK
--
To
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 12:15 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:10:02 +0200
> Camaleón wrote:
>
> >Well, you can "unmute" any of the detected input/outputs by this command
> >that can be run on system boot:
>
> > amixer set PCM 100 unmute
>
> >Not sure if this will help in
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:10:02 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
>Well, you can "unmute" any of the detected input/outputs by this command
>that can be run on system boot:
> amixer set PCM 100 unmute
>Not sure if this will help in your case, though... maybe using "alsactl"
>to store the volume/unmuted opt
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:02 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
> I experienced no issues with the dist-upgrade.
In my troubles with that I'm sure they installed alsa-base with everything
muted.
Sound for me only returned after messing about with the alsamixergui keyboard
controls of which some
performed the upgrade as I waiting to see how this evaluates,
> but I wanted to advise that 1.0.25+2+nmu2 alsa-base seems to list
> linux-sound-base as a dependency, yet it also breaks it.
>
> Thoughts?
I experienced no issues with the dist-upgrade. The package "linux-sound-
base&q
dvice maybe I should report that when removing the
> linux-sound-base and replacing it with alsa-base something comes muted
> in the alsamixer(gui) that seemed to only be resolved with 'keyboard'
> comands mentioned in the gui help menu. That's all I can tell you.
Today th
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:10:03 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
> If package "linux-sound-base" has been dropped and this generates an
> error in your system, you better report it,
Thanks for this advice maybe I should report that when removing the
linux-sound-base and replacing it with als
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:56:29 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
> Camaleón wrote:
(...)
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/a/alsa-base/alsa-base_1.0.25+2+nmu1/changelog
>>* Drop linux-sound-base: OSS was removed from the k
On Thu, 23 Aug 2012 08:10:01 +0200
Charles Kroeger wrote:
> Joe wrote:
>
> > Has a mixer volume level been reset, the wrong sound card selected,
>
> No, the mixer hasn't been changed and I only have the one sound card
Every good fidgeter deserves favor..
By messing with the keyboard controls
Hello Charles,
From: Charles Kroeger
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:49:53 -0500
> I don't use Gnome or pulseaudio, removed pulseaudio last year.
>
> It's a damn mystery.
Appears this may also be related to
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585149
which is unresolved at this time
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:00:03 +0200
Joe wrote:
> Has a mixer volume level been reset, the wrong sound card selected,
No, the mixer hasn't been changed and I only have the one sound card
thanks for your suggestion.
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 22:20:01 +0200
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> Did you also upgrade from GNOME2 to GNOME3? Perhaps you didn't run
> pulseaudio and now you do run pulseaudio?
I don't use Gnome or pulseaudio, removed pulseaudio last year.
It's a damn mystery.
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 20:57 +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500
> Charles Kroeger wrote:
>
> > linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with
> > alsa-base
> >
> > but no sound.
> >
> > If linux-sound-base is reins
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500
Charles Kroeger wrote:
> linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with
> alsa-base
>
> but no sound.
>
> If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
>
> but still no sound
>
I don't have an
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:20:02 +0200
Camaleón wrote:
>> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
>> linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with alsa-base
> What "upgrade" are you referring to? Sid?
Yes, sid, AKA unstable: alsa-base
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 00:24:46 -0500, Charles Kroeger wrote:
> linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with alsa-base
What "upgrade" are you referring to? Sid?
> but no sound.
>
> If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
>
> but
linux-sound-base gets removed on the upgrade and replaced with alsa-base
but no sound.
If linux-sound-base is reinstalled then alsa-base is removed
but still no sound
--
CK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Addendum: The PCM volume setting in
gnome-volume-control was not retained after each clip
after removing alsa-base and alsa-utils. It was
necessary to reinstall those packages in order to get
alsactl, which saves the state of the sound card. :-(
But, a fresh install after purge got rid of the
I have alsa as module in the kernel and selected
Crystal Logic CS46XX as the driver in the .config. I
think it is OK, I purged
alsa-base and alsa-utils but was able to play
streaming audio.
I had read that Alsa was included in the 2.6.8 kernel
so
I think this is OK to do.
Thanks.
--
To
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 08:15:15PM -0700, Dominique Brazziel wrote:
> I'm trying to get rid of modprobe error messages
> (FATAL: Error trying to install sound_slot_1) and
> think it has to do with the file
> /etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base. I configured
> a custom-built 2.6.8 ke
I'm trying to get rid of modprobe error messages
(FATAL: Error trying to install sound_slot_1) and
think it has to do with the file
/etc/modprobe.d/alsa-base. I configured
a custom-built 2.6.8 kernel to have modular alsa
support
and have it working correctly with the one sound card
I
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 04:34:25PM -0800, Rodney D. Myers said
> I'm using debian Sarge
>
> I've been attempting to install the alsa sound system, but it keeps
> failing.
>
> When doing a listing the installed packages I see;
>
> dpkg -l | grep alsa
> i
I'm using debian Sarge
I've been attempting to install the alsa sound system, but it keeps
failing.
When doing a listing the installed packages I see;
dpkg -l | grep alsa
iF alsa-base 1.0.1-1ALSA sound driver common files
rc alsa-modules-2 0.9.6+1Advanced L
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:48:28AM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> > > I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
> >
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 09:48:28AM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
...
> > I'm also using woody, and alsa-base_0.5.0d-1 came with the last apt-get
upgrade.
> > Perhaps, an apt-get update helps.
...
> I am running Woody. Odd that
On Sun, Oct 15, 2000 at 03:55:40PM +0200, Florian Friesdorf wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> > I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
> > Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
&g
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 09:03:22PM -0500, Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
> Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
> which is true. It should be getting alsa-base_0.5.9d-1.deb.
> How to I fix thi
"Kevin C. Smith" wrote:
> I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
> Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
Maybe it's because you dont have woody in your /etc/apt/sources.list
I think woody provide alsa 0.5.9
Olivier.
I attempted an apt-get install alsa-base, however this failed.
Received the message stating that alsa-base_0.5.9c-8.deb is not available,
which is true. It should be getting alsa-base_0.5.9d-1.deb.
How to I fix this? Do I need to report it to someone?
Thanks,
Kevin
just today while doing an installation, i noticed alsa-base stopping (in
pre-inst) and starting the sound driver again.
the thing i started to wonder about is, why is it so?
if there hasn't been any major changes in the latest releases, the script
starts the driver and restores mixer set
79 matches
Mail list logo
