Re: allowing users to update stuff on the server

2003-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.01.16.1807 +0100]: > Well, it is possible to have the key fingerprint logged; see the last > message of #75043. However, that probably isn't what you want. It would result in a hacked solution... > I think you should use a forced command in autho

Re: allowing users to update stuff on the server

2003-01-16 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 05:44:28PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > First off, please excuse the missins subject. > > > let's say everything works on the server, all i need is a method to > > authenticate a user and upon successful authentication, pass the IP > > s/he used for the authentication on

allowing users to update stuff on the server

2003-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
First off, please excuse the missins subject. > let's say everything works on the server, all i need is a method to > authenticate a user and upon successful authentication, pass the IP > s/he used for the authentication on to a script that takes care of the > edit. > > There exists a fake POP3 s