On Tue 21 Feb 2023 at 16:06:48 (+0100), Andreas Leha wrote:
> David Wright writes:
> > On Mon 20 Feb 2023 at 10:39:21 (+0100), Andreas Leha wrote:
> >> Greg Wooledge writes:
> >> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:04:22PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> >> >> But even that's not enough
> >> >> because the
David Wright writes:
> On Mon 20 Feb 2023 at 10:39:21 (+0100), Andreas Leha wrote:
>> Greg Wooledge writes:
>> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:04:22PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
>> >> But even that's not enough
>> >> because the field width is somewhat variable: try ps -eo '%c | %z |
>> >> %
On Mon 20 Feb 2023 at 10:39:21 (+0100), Andreas Leha wrote:
> Greg Wooledge writes:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:04:22PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> >> But even that's not enough
> >> because the field width is somewhat variable: try ps -eo '%c | %z |
> >> %a'
> >> (We can still use | to
Greg Wooledge writes:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:04:22PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
>> But even that's not enough
>> because the field width is somewhat variable: try ps -eo '%c | %z | %a'
>> (We can still use | to make the problem somewhat more obvious.)
>
> Oh wow. Yeah, OK, that's not
goto get_more;
> +if(c) goto aix_oops;
> goto looks_ok;
>get_desc:
> items++;
> c = *walk++;
> -if(c) goto initial;
> +if(c&&c!=' ') goto initial;
> +return _("missing AIX field descriptor")
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 12:04:22PM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> But even that's not enough
> because the field width is somewhat variable: try ps -eo '%c | %z | %a'
> (We can still use | to make the problem somewhat more obvious.)
Oh wow. Yeah, OK, that's not really solvable.
For those who
On Sat 18 Feb 2023 at 09:53:01 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> It should be noted that there appear to be two TYPES of data fields:
> numeric and string. Look at this example:
>
> unicorn:~$ ps -o '%C %g %n %p %U %a'
> %CPU RGROUPNI PID USER COMMAND
> 0.0 greg 01010 greg
ternatives?
Because data fields can contain internal whitespace, the only way to
parse the output of ps and determine the right spot to put pipelines
(or whatever) would be to parse the header row. All of the headers
listed under "AIX format specifiers" are free of whitespace. So, on
x27;s the required format, what are the alternatives?
> This sounds like a bug in procps that should be reported,
> if it hasn't already.
And how long before it's fixed?
As for whether it /is/ a bug, I guess that depends on the
interpretation of somewhat in "This ps supports AIX format
descriptors, which work somewhat like the formatting codes
of printf(1) and printf(3)." That's beyond my pay-grade.
Cheers,
David.
on shall ensure that the format specification is a list of
>names presented as a single argument, or -separated.
>
> So the behavior of ps in bullseye is an extension of the POSIX requirement,
> and apparently only applies to the "AIX format specifiers", which
arated.
So the behavior of ps in bullseye is an extension of the POSIX requirement,
and apparently only applies to the "AIX format specifiers", which are yet
another extension.
On bullseye:
unicorn:~$ ps -o '%U|%p|%a'
USER|PID|COMMAND
greg| 1010|bash
greg|20235
On 2023-02-17 at 13:21, debian-u...@howorth.org.uk wrote:
> Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
>> This sounds like a bug in procps that should be reported, if it
>> hasn't already.
>
> It might be a bug if it disagreed with its documentation. But do the
> docs say anything about this feature? What they do
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> This sounds like a bug in procps that should be reported, if it
> hasn't already.
It might be a bug if it disagreed with its documentation. But do the
docs say anything about this feature? What they do say is that you
should be able to use comma-separated field decriptions
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 09:20:34AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Fri 17 Feb 2023 at 10:05:20 (+0300), Reco wrote:
> > So, to answer your question - currently the only way to restore the
> > behaviour you want is to patch procps and rebuild it.
Fabulous analysis.
> Or, depending on the context,
if(c==' ')goto get_more;
> +if(c) goto aix_oops;
> goto looks_ok;
>get_desc:
> items++;
> c = *walk++;
> -if(c) goto initial;
> +if(c&&c!=' ') goto initial;
> +return _("missing AIX field des
nitial;
+if(c&&c!=' ') goto initial;
+return _("missing AIX field descriptor");
+ aix_oops:
return _("improper AIX field descriptor");
looks_ok:
;
If you look at "get_more" label, you'll notice that "old" version of
procp
Hi all,
I am facing a strange issue. This command used to work
ps -eo '%p|%C'
Now, on a debian testing machine only
ps -eo '%p %C'
works. Running
ps -eo '%p|%C'
results in this error:
error: improper AIX field descriptor
ps --version says &#x
7%9E%D7%95%D7%93%D7%99%D7%9D
Hebrew )
I ask you .
maybe they are wrong and flex gives the same output as lex on AIX ?
P.s.
The compilers are cc and gcc .
Thnx in advance.
- --
- --
Could you at least use man ?
Jabka Atu (aka mha13/Mashrom Head) || bsh83.blogspot.com
- --
-BEGIN PGP
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:28 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
I'm having some problems setting up 4 nfs shares that mount reliably on
an Etch box that is importing the share from an RS/6000 AIX v3.2
server. It takes about a minute to mount each share at boot, and abo
On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 13:28 -0700, Freddy Freeloader wrote:
> I'm having some problems setting up 4 nfs shares that mount reliably on
> an Etch box that is importing the share from an RS/6000 AIX v3.2
> server. It takes about a minute to mount each share at boot, and about
>
I'm having some problems setting up 4 nfs shares that mount reliably on
an Etch box that is importing the share from an RS/6000 AIX v3.2
server. It takes about a minute to mount each share at boot, and about
1/2 that time to manually mount one of the shares share. I get an "RPC:
Hello Philippe,
Am 2005-11-09 11:31:06, schrieb Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro):
>
> Hello,
>
> I use ssmtp on debian, which works great!
> We also have an AIX server who needs the same functionality, can ssmtp
> work on AIX ?
Hmmm, it should compile without problems...
> Thnx
Title: Debian ssmtp on AIX ?
Hello,
I use ssmtp on debian, which works great!
We also have an AIX server who needs the same functionality, can ssmtp work on AIX ?
Thnx!
wtf?
yea, you stole all the good stuff from unix.
lol
heraus laut lachen
lol
shutup. i'm gonna email all your friends and tell them you suck.
go ahead. baby.
andandand... i revoke your unix! how do you like that?
oh no, you didn't. AIX is forever.
ac
Hello,
Somebody knows how can i user the AIX fonts in Debian/GNU Linux? The
AIX fonts are great! And i wanna that... in the console, or in
Eterm.
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Do you know how can i use AIX fonts in Eterm? The AIX fonts are great,
and i wanna use them. Really, i want use them in my console too, but
this is a more hard job. Then, if can i put them in my Eterm
Thanks!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Sorry for the cross post, but maybe someone reads debian-user and not
debian-firewall that knows.
-Original Message-
Hey,
I'm trying to take over the firewall of our company. I would like to deploy
a Linux masq'd gateway (which I have done before for another company) to
r
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>cc: Chris Hoover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-user@lists.debian.org,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [OFFTOPIC]Gnu Utils For AIX
>Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/32635
>X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Keith Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Chris Hoover wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone knows if there are any GNU (or other no
> > cost) utils that work with AIX. Specifically, I'm hoping to find
> > somethi
On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Keith Beattie wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Chris Hoover wrote:
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone knows if there are any GNU (or other no
> > cost) utils that work with AIX. Specifically, I'm hoping to find
> > somethi
The source for the top program can be obtained at
http://www.groupsys.com/topinfo
__ ||
[|-dmund L_]au
`-
()_
[]nformation & ((omputer ((cience
''
On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 02:18:01PM -0500, Chris Hoover wrote:
>
> I was wondering if anyone knows if there are any GNU (or other no
> cost) utils that work with AIX. Specifically, I'm hoping to find
> something like top. So we can find out which process is trying to
> kill
I was wondering if anyone knows if there are any GNU (or other no cost) utils
that work with AIX. Specifically, I'm hoping to find something like top. So
we can find out which process is trying to kill the machine here at work.
TIA,
Chris
Dear Sir
I have installed the Debian 2.0 in my PC . When I use SCO or IBM AIX , I can
use 'admin' or 'smit' tools to adminstrate my system , such as adduser ,
mount file system ...
Has Debian such user-friendly tools?
Please give me some information about that .
Than
34 matches
Mail list logo
