On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Sunday 06 July 2014 11:27:25 Joe wrote:
>> We started with keyboard and mouse with the Pi, and then found it was
>> controllable by our TV remote control, through the HDMI connection. It
>> Just Worked.
>
> Lucky you.
>
> Lisi
Anyway, the poi
On Monday 07 July 2014 00:50:04 Ric Moore wrote:
> On 07/06/2014 06:16 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > I think that I have bitten off more than I can chew. I should stick
> > to "normal" computers. I grock them. :-(
>
> Please forgive, but I have to ...it's "grok" :) Ric
:-(
Thanks, Ric.
--
To UN
On 07/06/2014 06:16 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
I think that I have bitten off more than I can chew. I should stick
to "normal" computers. I grock them. :-(
Please forgive, but I have to ...it's "grok" :) Ric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "un
On Sunday 06 July 2014 11:27:25 Joe wrote:
> We started with keyboard and mouse with the Pi, and then found it was
> controllable by our TV remote control, through the HDMI connection. It
> Just Worked.
Lucky you.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On 07/05/2014 11:11 PM Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from the
occasional glitc
On Sun, 6 Jul 2014 11:16:01 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
>
> I'm also having trouble using the remote. I have found lots of stuff
> via Google that says go to here, then go to there, but absolutely
> nothing that says *how* to get there. I have managed to open the
> video folder, and turn the m/c
On Saturday 05 July 2014 23:44:46 Ric Moore wrote:
> On 07/05/2014 05:45 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 July 2014 22:32:25 Ric Moore wrote:
> >> On 07/05/2014 03:39 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> >>> Loads of people have streaming Internet. It must be possible. And
> >>> yes, once I hace a box
On Sunday 06 July 2014 04:11:27 Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
> >> Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
> >> device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
>> Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
>> device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from the
>> occasional glitch when a provider thoughtlessly changes
2014/07/06 1:51 "Lisi Reisz" :
>
> On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
> > Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
> > device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from the
> > occasional glitch when a provider thoughtlessly changes his protocol.
>
On 07/05/2014 05:45 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Saturday 05 July 2014 22:32:25 Ric Moore wrote:
On 07/05/2014 03:39 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Loads of people have streaming Internet. It must be possible. And yes,
once I hace a box that is adequate, I may need to do something with my
network.
Will
On Saturday 05 July 2014 22:32:25 Ric Moore wrote:
> On 07/05/2014 03:39 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > Loads of people have streaming Internet. It must be possible. And yes,
> > once I hace a box that is adequate, I may need to do something with my
> > network.
>
> Will XBMC do the job with your hard
On 07/05/2014 03:39 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
Loads of people have streaming Internet. It must be possible. And yes, once
I hace a box that is adequate, I may need to do something with my network.
Will XBMC do the job with your hardware?? If it will run, then running
it as a dedicated server-on
On Saturday 05 July 2014 18:45:50 Brian wrote:
> On Sat 05 Jul 2014 at 17:51:32 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
> > > Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
> > > device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from t
On Sat 05 Jul 2014 at 17:51:32 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
> > Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
> > device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from the
> > occasional glitch when a provider thoughtlessly
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 17:51:32 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
> > Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
> > device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from
> > the occasional glitch when a provider thoughtlessly ch
On Saturday 05 July 2014 17:30:19 Joe wrote:
> Joel mentioned the Raspberry Pi, which is a very low-power [ARM]
> device, which does the UK catchup channels pretty well, apart from the
> occasional glitch when a provider thoughtlessly changes his protocol.
Not for me it doesn't. And I was told th
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014 15:06:04 +0100
Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Having just bought myself another doorstop (except that this one is
> too light even to stop a door) in the form of:
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/XstreamTec-MX-version-Internal-Included/dp/B00F0PZZIW
> I am doing what I should have done in the f
One more thought --
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Having just bought myself another doorstop (except that this one is too light
> even to stop a door) in the form of:
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/XstreamTec-MX-version-Internal-Included/dp/B00F0PZZIW
> [...]
Have you asked abo
I have not done this, but these questions come to mind:
On Sat, Jul 5, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> Having just bought myself another doorstop (except that this one is too light
> even to stop a door) in the form of:
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/XstreamTec-MX-version-Internal-Included/dp/B0
Having just bought myself another doorstop (except that this one is too light
even to stop a door) in the form of:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/XstreamTec-MX-version-Internal-Included/dp/B00F0PZZIW
I am doing what I should have done in the first place and asking for advice.
I want to be able to strea
On 20140411_1642+0100, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 11 April 2014 16:23:49 Paul E Condon wrote:
> > This is pretty clear indication that wheezy-backports won't help,
> > Or did I make a mistake? What mistake?
>
> There is no findutils package in Wheezy backports.
>
> https://packages.debian.org/
On 20140411_1853+0200, Florian Ernst wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 04:58:56PM +0100, Martin Read wrote:
> > As Lisi Reisz notes, findutils is not in wheezy-backports. A search on
> > packages.debian.org reveals that a package of findutils 4.5.12 was created
> > for experimental on 2013-09-28, bu
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 04:58:56PM +0100, Martin Read wrote:
> As Lisi Reisz notes, findutils is not in wheezy-backports. A search on
> packages.debian.org reveals that a package of findutils 4.5.12 was created
> for experimental on 2013-09-28, but for whatever reason the maintainer has
> not acted
On 20140411_1639+0100, Brian wrote:
> On Fri 11 Apr 2014 at 09:23:49 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> > root@big:/etc/apt# aptitude -t wheezy-backports install findutils
> > No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 72 not upgr
On 11/04/14 16:23, Paul E Condon wrote:
This is pretty clear indication that wheezy-backports won't help,
Or did I make a mistake? What mistake?
An alternative source of findutils that fits with Wheezy? Where? How?
You don't appear to have made a mistake.
As Lisi Reisz notes, findutils is not
On Friday 11 April 2014 16:23:49 Paul E Condon wrote:
> This is pretty clear indication that wheezy-backports won't help,
> Or did I make a mistake? What mistake?
There is no findutils package in Wheezy backports.
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=findutils&searchon=names§ion=all&suite=
On Fri 11 Apr 2014 at 09:23:49 -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> root@big:/etc/apt# aptitude -t wheezy-backports install findutils
> No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 72 not upgraded.
> Need to get 0 B of archives. After unp
I have discovered, with help form Bernhard Voelker, a user of
openSUSE, that the version of findutils that I am using (4.4.2)
contains a bug that explains crashes in my use case. He is using
(4.5.12) and recommends >=(4.5.10)
I have attempted to use wheezy-backports using instructions at:
http://b
On Ma, 21 ian 14, 17:35:06, Curt wrote:
> On 2014-01-21, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > If the computer still locks up my first guess would be the radeon driver=20
> > (package xserver-xorg-video-radeon).
>
> My understanding was that the "bug" occurred when he tried the
> proprietary display driv
On 2014-01-21, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>
> If the computer still locks up my first guess would be the radeon driver=20
> (package xserver-xorg-video-radeon).
My understanding was that the "bug" occurred when he tried the
proprietary display driver and disappears when he reverts to the open
source o
On Lu, 20 ian 14, 14:40:39, Paul wrote:
>
> I am unsure whether to report the bug to Xorg, Mesa (Gallium) or Debian.
> Please provide a link. Your advice is appreciated.
I would try to reproduce the bug with less software:
- use startx instead of gdm3
- use a window manager like openbox instead
Hi,
Please advise whom I should report the following bug:
I experience a total computer lockup shortly after booting the computer. No
particular application is involved. The scenario occurs while working in
the Gnome 3 desktop environment (gdm3). Keyboard and mouse input is
ignored. The screen i
Thanx to all who shared their thoughts, you've been really helpful guys
(as always).
As many pointed out, the crux of the question is my ISP who's only
giving me one IP number. You've helped me understand why a switch won't
do and why a router is needed.
So, for the time being, I will kee
On 21/04/11 02:56, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Dom put forth on 4/20/2011 1:25 PM:
I run Smoothwall on an old Athlon (K6) system that I was given. I
The K7 is the original Athlon. The K6 series chips had no marketing
name other than "K6", i.e. K6, K6-2, K6-2+, K6-3, K6-3+, etc.
The only issue I h
Howdy!
I already found good advice in one of the posts on your
question. Personally, I'd stick with pair of linksys
wrt54gl, putting dd-wrt on both or three of them and ma-
king it do the work. The site has tutorials for all of
situations one might experience.
For another approach, there is better
Hi Paul,
Paul E Condon wrote:
> I'm lurking here, looking to better understand a problem that I've never
had to confront: NAT, I understand requires translation tables, one entry
for each active tcp connection. This takes RAM. It also takes enough
CPU cycles to maintain this table --- set up n
Dom put forth on 4/20/2011 1:25 PM:
> I run Smoothwall on an old Athlon (K6) system that I was given. I
The K7 is the original Athlon. The K6 series chips had no marketing
name other than "K6", i.e. K6, K6-2, K6-2+, K6-3, K6-3+, etc.
> The only issue I have is that the latest upgrade to Smoothw
On 20/04/11 18:52, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/20/2011 06:08 AM, Klistvud wrote:
[snip]
What I had in mind is something like this:
http://www.ehow.com/how_6823201_use-switch-hub-instead-router.html .
Unfortunately, there are many posts on the Internet affirming that such
a configuration can't and
On 04/20/2011 06:08 AM, Klistvud wrote:
[snip]
What I had in mind is something like this:
http://www.ehow.com/how_6823201_use-switch-hub-instead-router.html .
Unfortunately, there are many posts on the Internet affirming that such
a configuration can't and won't work, because a switch can't give
Paul E Condon wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I'm lurking here, looking to better understand a problem that I've never
> had to confront: NAT, I understand requires translation tables, one entry
> for each active tcp connection. This takes RAM. It also takes enough
> CPU cycles to maintain this table --
On 20110421_003957, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Klistvud wrote:
> >I'm planning to purchase a wired (consumer grade) switch since I've
> >heard they're inherently more robust than (consumer grade) routers,
> >and I'm planning to connect it *directly* to our cable broadband
> >modem. Then, th
Hi,
Klistvud wrote:
I'm planning to purchase a wired (consumer grade) switch since I've
heard they're inherently more robust than (consumer grade) routers, and
I'm planning to connect it *directly* to our cable broadband modem.
Then, the two families would connect their respective routers (we
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 01:08:22PM +0200, Klistvud wrote:
> Unfortunately, there are many posts on the Internet affirming that
> such a configuration can't and won't work, because a switch can't
> give out two IP's if your ISP just gives you one. So, in doubt, I
This is the crucial point. If your
Klistvud:
> Dne, 20. 04. 2011 11:25:27 je Jochen Schulz napisal(a):
>> Klistvud:
>>>
>>> I'm planning to purchase a wired (consumer grade) switch since I've
>>> heard they're inherently more robust than (consumer grade) routers,
>>> and I'm planning to connect it *directly* to our cable broadband
* Jochen Schulz [110420 05:48]:
> Klistvud:
> > And here's what I need advice for:
> You are looking for a router (OSI layer 3), not a switch (OSI layer 2).
> It needs to have three distinct interfaces (1xWAN, 2xLAN). If it runs
...
> I think even a simple Linksys WRT54GL would suffice. AFAIK you
Dne, 20. 04. 2011 11:25:27 je Jochen Schulz napisal(a):
Klistvud:
> And here's what I need advice for:
>
> I'm planning to purchase a wired (consumer grade) switch since I've
> heard they're inherently more robust than (consumer grade) routers,
> and I'm planning to connect it *directly* to our c
Klistvud:
> And here's what I need advice for:
>
> I'm planning to purchase a wired (consumer grade) switch since I've
> heard they're inherently more robust than (consumer grade) routers,
> and I'm planning to connect it *directly* to our cable broadband
> modem. Then, the two families would conn
Howdie, fellow Debianites!
Any networking guru lurking on the list?
Here's the situation. There's basically two (interrelated) families
sharing our broadband connection. In the other family, there's this
person who's downloading large numbers of files around the clock. As
we've just upgrad
Hello all,
I said that gplhost had not replied to my email about help with a domU
dist-upgrade. They did reply but the reply was in my gplhost account.
So all OK now,
regards
peter colton
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 16:18, Peter Colton wrote:
>
Hello all,
I need a bit of advise on upgrading a xen domU from sarge to etch. I emailed
gplhost where the domU is hosted. To see if they could give me some pointers
on howto upgrade a domU but unfortunely I have not yet got any replie.
If I where upgrading a standard debain install I w
There is a mailing list for sed [EMAIL PROTECTED] for
those interested in keeping tabs on this editor and exchanging tips.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "181","1324.014027","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payload t
> ype=ITU-T H.261, SSRC=2008229573, Seq=54520, Time=1725612773, Mark"
> "185","1324.078941","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payload t
> ype=ITU-T H.261, SSRC=2008229573, S
On 2007-05-31T17:05:04+0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> I need to delete some words out of a large file containing
> information about packets I'm analysing. I know I can use sed to do
> this, but haven't really used it before, so am a bit unsure of how to
> do it. Two example lines are as of be
On 05/31/07 11:05, Piers Kittel wrote:
Hello all,
I need to delete some words out of a large file containing information
about packets I'm analysing. I know I can use sed to do this, but
haven't really used it before, so am a bit unsure of how to do it. Two
example lines are as of below:
On 2007-05-31, Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "181","1324.014027","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payload t
> ype=ITU-T H.261, SSRC=2008229573, Seq=54520, Time=1725612773, Mark"
> "185","1324.078941","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payload t
> ype=ITU-T H.261, S
Piers Kittel wrote:
Hello all,
I need to delete some words out of a large file containing information
about packets I'm analysing. I know I can use sed to do this, but
haven't really used it before, so am a bit unsure of how to do it. Two
example lines are as of below:
"181","1324.014027"
On 2007-05-31 17:05 +0100, Piers Kittel wrote:
> "181","1324.014027","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payload t
> ype=ITU-T H.261, SSRC=2008229573, Seq=54520, Time=1725612773, Mark"
> "185","1324.078941","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payload t
> ype=ITU-T H.261, SSRC=20082
On 31 May 2007, at 17:49, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
Piers Kittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"181","1324.014027","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP","Payloa
d t
ype=ITU-T H.261, SSRC=2008229573, Seq=54520, Time=1725612773, Mark"
"185","1324.078941","111.111.111.111","111.111.111.111","RTP",
t;$f1\",\"$f2\",\"$f3\",\"$f4\",\"$f5\",\"$f6\""
done
Enjoy,
Larry
- Original Message -
From: "Piers Kittel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 12:05 PM
Subject: Sed advice needed
Hello all,
Piers Kittel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote on Thu, 31 May 2007 17:05:04 +0100:
>What's the best way to do this? I've been reading the man pages of
>sed, cut and awk but I can't quite figure out how to do this. Any
>ideas?
The sed man page is not very helpful I'm afraid. A pretty good manual is
Hello all,
I need to delete some words out of a large file containing
information about packets I'm analysing. I know I can use sed to do
this, but haven't really used it before, so am a bit unsure of how to
do it. Two example lines are as of below:
"181","1324.014027","111.111.111.111"
>I thought all the kernels were SMP-enabled now, no? Didn't Debian do
>away with the distinction between SMP and non-SMP kernels? At least,
>when I look at what's available with aptitude, all the kernel images
>labelled with "-smp" are given as "for transition only."
Unless I'm mistaken the 486
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:50 +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> With 4 GB of RAM, you probably don't need a swap at all. Since you have
> a duel core machine, make sure you use an smp kernel. Everything should
> work fine and you'll have a fine system that I and others can be jealous
> over.
I thought al
Land Haj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm afraid I'll encounter more stuff like this with that kernel. What
> other smp-kernel would be a good choice for my hardware?
Maybe the -k7 image will do?
HTH,
Andrei
--
If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough.
(Albert Einstei
'm afraid I'll encounter more stuff like this with that kernel. What other
smp-kernel would be a good choice for my hardware?
/landhaj
- Original Message
From: Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:00:59 AM
Subjec
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:50:17PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> > I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before it
> > became an official debian port, but for the next few years I will have 0
> > time for fixing stuff that might break, and so I'm gonna use stable
> > instead, star
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liam O'Toole wrote:
[snip]
>>. It seems people have blinders on today. He said he wanted to use the
>> 32-bit version and he currently uses the 64-bit version. One can't
>> downgrade a system from 64-bit to 32-bit easily. IMO, one would be
>> better
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 13:20:44 +0100
Joe Hart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Liam O'Toole wrote:
[...]
> > But there is another possibility you should consider. Rather than
> > reinstalling, you could change your apt sources right now, run
> > 'ap
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Liam O'Toole wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
> Land Haj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before
>> it became an official debian port, but for the next few years I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Pobega wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:50:17PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Land Haj wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before it
>>> becam
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 03:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Land Haj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before
> it became an official debian port, but for the next few years I will
> have 0 time for fixing stuff that might break, and so I'm gonna use
>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:50:17PM +0100, Joe Hart wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Land Haj wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before it
> > became an official debian port, but for the next few years I will have 0
> > t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Land Haj wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before it
> became an official debian port, but for the next few years I will have 0
> time for fixing stuff that might break, and so I'm gonna use stable
> instead
Hi!
I've been using sid for amd64 on my production machine since before it became
an official debian port, but for the next few years I will have 0 time for
fixing stuff that might break, and so I'm gonna use stable instead, starting
with etch. Ideally I should make the move in the next few day
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006 12:03:12 +1000, Jude DaShiell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I want to be able to run X with debian. Older monitor died and had an
ati card with it that does work the new monitor. The new monitor is an
Gateway ev910 crt which was also known as a sony trinitron with single
I want to be able to run X with debian. Older monitor died and had an ati
card with it that does work the new monitor. The new monitor is an Gateway
ev910 crt which was also known as a sony trinitron with single gun so is
very cool in temperature when it runs. The ati card will not work in X and
On Sunday 29 January 2006 9:24 pm, Stan Banash wrote:
> Guys,
>
> This where I am to date with the driver. I compiled the hpt302.ko module
> and transferred it to a diskette. When the installation process failed to
> find the hard disk partition, I did the Alt-F2. I mounted the 3.5 inch
> drive a
0854.html
A
>
> Anyone have any suggestions on where to go from here?
>
> Thanks,
> Stan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Sackville-West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 11:45 AM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subj
Advice Needed
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:19:27 -0800
"Stan Banash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hendrik and Dave,
>
> Thanks for the info it is much appreciated. Dave please send the link, I
> would like to review the info. Although, my situation is not exactly the
>
Stan Banash wrote:
Thanks for the info it is much appreciated. Dave please send the link, I
would like to review the info. Although, my situation is not exactly the
same as yours. In my case the Optiplex bios disables the IDE controller on
the motherboard when a second one (the Rocket 133) is ad
lot here and hopefully
> others are too.
>
> FYI: Dave, I added your response to the chain here so that the record is
> complete.
>
> Thanks,
> Stan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Witbrodt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:32 PM
Stan,
What I would do is the following:
As you've stated run the primary IDE on the 20GB drive and remove the secondary
drive. Compile the kernel (2.6) with the correct driver. When completed, add
the 250G drive back and try to access that drive.
I didn't have the same problem but a similar pro
fully
others are too.
FYI: Dave, I added your response to the chain here so that the record is
complete.
Thanks,
Stan
-Original Message-
From: Dave Witbrodt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:32 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IDE PCI Advice N
However, I would still like to know how to get the driver into the debian
installer image. It seems that there should be a way for the installer to
deal with this situation. Like maybe identifying hardware for which no
driver is available in the install and asking the user to provide it during
Stan Banash wrote:
> That is the path I am currently on. So far I have moved the primary drive
> (20 GB) over to the IDE controller (Intel 82371 PIIX4 chipset) on the
> motherboard. The 250 GB drive is set as the secondary on the Rocket 133
> IDE
> controller. I am getting ready to install the 2.
Justin,
Thanks for the assist. I'll try those options this weekend and let the list
know the results.
Stan
-Original Message-
From: Justin Guerin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:58 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IDE PCI Advice Neede
hts?
Stan
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Sackville-West [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 3:40 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IDE PCI Advice Needed
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:49:51 -0800
"Stan Banash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Friday 27 January 2006 14:32, Stan Banash wrote:
> All,
>
> I am currently trying to build out a new Debian system
> and am having some issues with getting the IDE PCI
> card drivers installed. I'm relatively new at setting
> up Debian and have been working this issue for several
> days now. T
see if the HPT302.ko driver was included - it is
> not.
>
> Thanks,
> Stan
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Zagrabelny [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:21 PM
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: IDE PCI Advice Nee
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 2:21 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: IDE PCI Advice Needed
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:32 -0800, Stan Banash wrote:
> All,
>
> I am currently trying to build out a new Debian system
> and am having some issues
On Fri, 2006-01-27 at 13:32 -0800, Stan Banash wrote:
> All,
>
> I am currently trying to build out a new Debian system
> and am having some issues with getting the IDE PCI
> card drivers installed. I'm relatively new at setting
> up Debian and have been working this issue for several
> days now.
All,
I am currently trying to build out a new Debian system
and am having some issues with getting the IDE PCI
card drivers installed. I'm relatively new at setting
up Debian and have been working this issue for several
days now. That said, here are the specifics:
System:
Dell Optiplex GX1P, 7
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:13:31AM -0500, J French wrote:
> We are setting up Debian Linux on a new server for a PostGreSQL database. In
> the past, on FreeBSD, I used the dump utility with the live filesystem
> (snapshot) switch to backup the running database. Does dump on linux support
> live
You might check out bakula or afbackup, they're both on sourceforge I
think. Trying google will also work :-)
Cheers & success!
Wim
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:22:13AM -0400, Tom Vier wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:13:31AM -0500, J French wrote:
> > Debian (or linux in general)? I need a r
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:50:05PM +0200, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:23PM +0200, Alberto Zeni wrote:
> > > Dear Sirs,
> >
> > There are some Madams here as well. :-)
>
> It has come to my attention
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:55:31PM +0200, Maurits van Rees wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:23PM +0200, Alberto Zeni wrote:
> > Dear Sirs,
>
> There are some Madams here as well. :-)
It has come to my attention (thanks Mike McCarty) that in English,
"Sir" can mean "Sir or Ma'am" (though tha
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 09:42:23PM +0200, Alberto Zeni wrote:
> Dear Sirs,
There are some Madams here as well. :-)
> So, I wanted to submit all that to Debian bugs tracking system but they
> sent my message back saying that I hadn't specified the bug affected
> package and asked me to submit it
Dear Sirs,
A few days ago I have installed Debian 3.1 r0 "Sarge" on my PC.
Everything went all right except X-server which didn't start. In fact at
the end of the process the system tried to start it twice but
unsuccessfully, then I recived a message asking me to submit such bug to
Debian bugs
On Fri, Sep 16, 2005 at 11:13:31AM -0500, J French wrote:
> Debian (or linux in general)? I need a robust backup because this will be a
> production server. Advice is appreciated.
You cannot use dump on a read/write mounted fs - the kernel does not keep
writes from the fs coherent with the block
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
