Chris Davies wrote, on 01/12/12 00:12:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>> Here I'm using "rdate -an" in a cron job with something like the following
>> rdate -acnv $NTPHOST
>
> Just like ntpdate or any of the other cron based solutions proposed in
> this thread, this does not train the clock. So alth
On Jan 11, 2012, at 10:17 AM, Sthu Deus wrote:
Good time of the day, Patrick.
You worte:
I see this message when running an update:
Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.daily/ntp ...
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `ntp'
overwrites defaults (empty).
S
Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Here I'm using "rdate -an" in a cron job with something like the following
> rdate -acnv $NTPHOST
Just like ntpdate or any of the other cron based solutions proposed in
this thread, this does not train the clock. So although rdate slews the
clock, it doesn't train it t
On Mi, 11 ian 12, 15:01:57, Bob Proulx wrote:
> >
> > From lurking on debian-devel I can tell that your guess is right on :)
> > (the motive is to speed-up the shutdown).
>
> Is there a plan for packages to deal with the links that are left
> behind? Could we, should we, start filing bugs if a p
Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > For reasons that I haven't been following there has been a push to
> > remove those shutdown links generally from everything. I don't know
> > why. Perhaps someone else will comment on why. Removing those links
> > seems like it breaks going to singl
On Mi, 11 ian 12, 10:26:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
>
> For reasons that I haven't been following there has been a push to
> remove those shutdown links generally from everything. I don't know
> why. Perhaps someone else will comment on why. Removing those links
> seems like it breaks going to single
Bob Proulx wrote, on 01/11/12 18:32:
> Sthu Deus wrote:
>> Not answering to Your question, but as mine opinion - if You do not
>> intend other hosts to be sync-ing time w/ this host, I think You need
>> the service at all.
>
> Time is important to most internet hosts. We always hate to see email
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>> I see this message when running an update:
>>
>> Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.daily/ntp ...
>> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `ntp'
>> overwrites defaults (empty).
>
> T
Sthu Deus wrote:
> Not answering to Your question, but as mine opinion - if You do not
> intend other hosts to be sync-ing time w/ this host, I think You need
> the service at all.
Time is important to most internet hosts. We always hate to see email
from users with a date of 1970 for example. I
Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> I see this message when running an update:
>
> Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.daily/ntp ...
> insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `ntp'
> overwrites defaults (empty).
That is a minor upgrade bug in the ntp package. You had a prev
Good time of the day, Patrick.
You worte:
>I see this message when running an update:
>
>Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.daily/ntp ...
>insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `ntp'
>overwrites defaults (empty).
>
>Should I be concerned about it? And, if so, w
Hi, all:
I see this message when running an update:
Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.daily/ntp ...
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `ntp'
overwrites defaults (empty).
Should I be concerned about it? And, if so, what am I supposed to do
to correct it.
On 4/25/09, leo wrote:
> when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
>
> "no server suitable for synchronization found"
> so it's posible a misconfiguration or no access
> what could be the problem here?
If you are running ntpd while trying ntpdate, it will fail (with the
above q
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 04:01:48PM -0700, leo wrote:
> when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
Try another ntp server...
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mar 26, 2009, at 8:44 AM, Chris Davies wrote:
leo wrote:
when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
"no server suitable for synchronization found"
The NTP Pool servers are all run on a "best endeavours" basis. (I
know,
because I run one.) So if one doesn't respond yo
leo wrote:
> when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
> "no server suitable for synchronization found"
The NTP Pool servers are all run on a "best endeavours" basis. (I know,
because I run one.) So if one doesn't respond you should try the next.
Since you're running debian, t
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 16:01:48 -0700
leo wrote:
> when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
>
> "no server suitable for synchronization found"
> so it's posible a misconfiguration or no access
> what could be the problem here?
>
>
>
>
Try using the man page
man ntpdat
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:08:20PM +0200, Andrei Popescu
(andreimpope...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Sat,25.Apr.09, 16:01:48, leo wrote:
> > when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
> >
> > "no server suitable for synchronization found"
> > so it's posible a misconfiguration or no
On Sat,25.Apr.09, 16:01:48, leo wrote:
> when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
>
> "no server suitable for synchronization found"
> so it's posible a misconfiguration or no access
> what could be the problem here?
Sorry I have to ask, but is that box connected to the inter
when I exec ntpdate -u pool.ntp.org for example, the out is:
"no server suitable for synchronization found"
so it's posible a misconfiguration or no access
what could be the problem here?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
20 matches
Mail list logo
