Carlo U Segre writes:
> One thing that strikes me about the change in the organization of the
> stable tree is that I have seen no simple instructions on how to make use
> of the updates in the bo-updates driectory since they are not linked to a
> version of the stable tree.
manoj writes:
> Do you
Hi,
>>"Eloy" == Eloy A Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Eloy> I think THIS IS THE PROBLEM with the new scheme: there is not a
Eloy> separate directory where you can get all the updates separately,
Eloy> you have to go to the stable directory because updates are
Eloy> merged directly into the main
Hi,
>>"Carlo" == Carlo U Segre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Carlo> Hello All: I have been following the discussion of the past few
Carlo> days with some interest. One thing that strikes me about the
Carlo> change in the organization of the stable tree is that I have
Carlo> seen no simple instructi
Syrus Nemat-Nasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: In addition, the packages in bo-updates are for use at the user's
: discretion--they have not been formally accepted as updates to the stable
: distribution AFAIK.
I think THIS IS THE PROBLEM with the new scheme: there is not a separate
directory wh
On Fri, 22 Aug 1997, Carlo U. Segre wrote:
> I have been following the discussion of the past few days with some
> interest. One thing that strikes me about the change in the organization
> of the stable tree is that I have seen no simple instructions on how to
> make use of the updates in the bo
Hello All:
I have been following the discussion of the past few days with some
interest. One thing that strikes me about the change in the organization
of the stable tree is that I have seen no simple instructions on how to
make use of the updates in the bo-updates driectory since they are not
li
6 matches
Mail list logo
