On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 08:45:01PM +0100, Robert Cates wrote:
> I've got a general question concerning apt-get - what would be the reason(s)
> for the below message when I upgrade my packages? Do I need to do an
> apt-get upgrade again at a later time, or is there something I need to do
> right aw
Hi all,
I've got a general question concerning apt-get - what would be the reason(s)
for the below message when I upgrade my packages? Do I need to do an
apt-get upgrade again at a later time, or is there something I need to do
right away to get it to install? I somehow was wondering if it's
hardik,
common etiquette for lists is to inline post, not top post. top posting
makes following threads unnecessarily more burdensome. thanks!
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 09:25 -0800, rangalo wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> thanks all for the help. I did apt-keys add with the downloaded file
> and it worked. T
Hi guys,
thanks all for the help. I did apt-keys add with the downloaded file
and it worked. The gpg import was not working .
regards,
Hardik
Douglas Tutty wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:02:42AM -0800, rangalo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I thanks for you suggestions.
> >
> > I tried the faq
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:02:42AM -0800, rangalo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thanks for you suggestions.
>
> I tried the faq but while importing the multimedia key, I get following
> message
> -
> [code]
>
> gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 07DC563D1F41B907 &&
> apt-key add /ro
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 01:02:42 -0800, rangalo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thanks for you suggestions.
>
> I tried the faq but while importing the multimedia key, I get following
> message
> -
> [code]
>
> gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 07DC563D1F41B907 &&
> apt-key add /root
Hi,
I thanks for you suggestions.
I tried the faq but while importing the multimedia key, I get following
message
-
[code]
gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 07DC563D1F41B907 &&
apt-key add /root/.gnupg/pubring.gpg && apt-get update
gpg: requesting key 1F41B907 from hkp s
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 03:43:00PM -0800, rangalo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a newbie at using apt-get. Although, I have used debian before, I
> was using apt-get only with cds, as I didnt have internet.
>
> I copied the sources.ist posted in this list from internet somewhere, i
> changed all the mirr
Hi,
I am a newbie at using apt-get. Although, I have used debian before, I
was using apt-get only with cds, as I didnt have internet.
I copied the sources.ist posted in this list from internet somewhere, i
changed all the mirrors fro us to de (germany) and it worked well for
me, except the debian
That's works fine, thanks a lot.
François
On Thu, 23 May 2002 13:46:14 +0200
Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:54:26PM +0200, Francois Chenais wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have installed tomcat/tomcat4/tomcat4-webapps/cocoon2/cocoon2-examples
> >
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 12:54:26PM +0200, Francois Chenais wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have installed tomcat/tomcat4/tomcat4-webapps/cocoon2/cocoon2-examples
> than remove them to make a new clean installation.
>
> After apt-get remove, some tomcat directories and file still there.
Hello,
I have installed tomcat/tomcat4/tomcat4-webapps/cocoon2/cocoon2-examples
than remove them to make a new clean installation.
After apt-get remove, some tomcat directories and file still there.
I have removed them by hand
rm -rf /var/cache/to
Hi!
I'm do an apt-get upgrade, but something is wrong.
It seems that some files there isn't at server on my source.list...
http.us.debian.org stable/main dnsutils and modutils by example, apt-get
says file not found, any help about this?
Or maybe I need to change my source.lists lines?
--
Rog
did you do apt-get update first?
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"When we have nothing left to give
There will be no reason for us to live
But when we have nothing left to lose
You will have nothing left to use"
-Fugazi
On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Rogelio E. Castillo Haro wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> "Nathan" == Nathan E Norman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nathan> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:35:43PM +0600, Bram Dumolin
Nathan> wrote:
>> re all,
>>
>> How do you simply replace a package with another package that
>> offers the same functionality? exim provides
>
re,
Ethan Benson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 12:05:20AM -0900:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:56:04PM +0600, Bram Dumolin wrote:
> > >
> > > exim gets removed, postfix gets installed.
> >
> > oic, I just tried with qmail, but that was the .deb I created from source,
> > so I imagine
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:56:04PM +0600, Bram Dumolin wrote:
> >
> > exim gets removed, postfix gets installed.
>
> oic, I just tried with qmail, but that was the .deb I created from source, so
> I imagine the dependency info is not in there...
> I never tried with something else.
this is be
re,
Nathan E Norman([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:50:58AM -0600:
> > How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the
> > same functionality?
> > exim provides mail-transport-agent
> > qmail as well
> >
> > so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:50:58AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> A zillion people will now bitch at you and claim that qmail is
> "non-free". While that's the debian party line I'm beginning to
> suspect debian holds this view because of the abrasive personal nature
> of Mr. Bernstein rather
re,
Ethan Benson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 11:38:57PM -0900:
> > How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the
> > same functionality?
> > exim provides mail-transport-agent
>
> apt-get install postfix
>
> exim gets removed, postfix gets installed.
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:35:43PM +0600, Bram Dumolin wrote:
> re all,
>
> How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the same
> functionality?
> exim provides mail-transport-agent
> qmail as well
>
> so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim to qmail
>
> Wh
hi
> so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim to qmail
replacing equivalent packages is easy when they are complied and distributed
as such
but qmail is a problem
I know of two approaches:
leave apt thinking exim is installed and just delete exim by hand, then
compile + install qmail
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 02:35:43PM +0600, Bram Dumolin wrote:
> re all,
>
> How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the same
> functionality?
> exim provides mail-transport-agent
apt-get install postfix
exim gets removed, postfix gets installed.
> qmail as well
>
re all,
How do you simply replace a package with another package that offers the same
functionality?
exim provides mail-transport-agent
qmail as well
so I want to upgrade mail-transport-agent from exim to qmail
What's the best way to do that? Pointers on a good apt-get/dpkg faq?
--
P
on Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:46:45PM -0600, Rogelio E. Castillo Haro,,, ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I use Debian since some months ago (potato).
> I did upgrade my box with apt-get dist-upgrade some times.
> But the last three or for seems like is nothing to upgrade exception
> from spide
I agree the ,helixcode stuff needs to be unstable, for everything
else you will be much better in the long run if you track one
thing and going by stable testing or unstable is better IMHO
because when a new version goes stable you will then get that
without having to mess with your sources. Also k
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 06:46:45PM -0600, Rogelio E. Castillo Haro,,, wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I use Debian since some months ago (potato).
> I did upgrade my box with apt-get dist-upgrade some times.
> But the last three or for seems like is nothing to upgrade exception
> from spidermonkey (gnome), so,
Hi!
I use Debian since some months ago (potato).
I did upgrade my box with apt-get dist-upgrade some times.
But the last three or for seems like is nothing to upgrade exception
from spidermonkey (gnome), so, It's better that I change my source.lists
to woody, or to another server?
Those are m
28 matches
Mail list logo
