Re: FW: about K6 bug

1998-06-03 Thread Stephen Carpenter
On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 10:11:17AM -0400, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote: > > >(ex: Office Max here in Anchorage has > >Packard Bell 200MMX's with 32MB SDRAM, 3GB HD's, 56k modems etc. for $699. > >The demo at the store has been running for over a month solid now with no > >problems...). > > Yep,

PC Opinions (was RE: FW: about K6 bug)

1998-06-03 Thread Hogland, Thomas E.
TED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 6:11 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: RE: FW: about K6 bug > > >(ex: Office Max here in Anchorage has > >Packard Bell 200MMX's with 32MB SDRAM, 3GB HD's, 56k modems etc. for > $699. > >

RE: FW: about K6 bug

1998-06-03 Thread Richard E. Hawkins Esq.
>(ex: Office Max here in Anchorage has >Packard Bell 200MMX's with 32MB SDRAM, 3GB HD's, 56k modems etc. for $699. >The demo at the store has been running for over a month solid now with no >problems...). Yep, that's about how long that brand will run :) More seriously, I'd avoid packard bill u

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread dg
On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > Hi all, Hi Eugene! > Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption > from Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> report. > > [... snipping this report ...] > > Sincerly

RE: FW: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Hogland, Thomas E.
, 1998 1:08 PM > To: Hogland, Thomas E. > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: FW: about K6 bug > > > On Tue, 2 Jun 1998, Hogland, Thomas E. wrote: > > > Same results here - I'm running on a K5-75 (one of the 486-133 > > "turbo-chips") in

FW: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Hogland, Thomas E.
to one on my systems (I have a K5-75, an Intel 486/100 and a PII-266 all running Debian). >>--<< > -- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 1998 6:34 AM > To: Debian Users > Sub

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Lee Bradshaw
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > Sincerly speaking I have now idea how cricual is this, but as far as > I consider K6 as a choice for upgrating my PC, I would like to know how > reliable is this assuming that I have no intention to run this testing > program very o

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Christian Zander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 02 Jun 1998, Nils Rennebarth wrote: >>On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: >> Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption >> from Andreas Ha

Re: about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Nils Rennebarth
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 12:22:15PM +0400, Eugene Sevinian wrote: > Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] > concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption > from Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> report. > > # OSCPU result > ==

about K6 bug

1998-06-02 Thread Eugene Sevinian
Hi all, Recently, there were a lot of post in [EMAIL PROTECTED] concerning new K6 bug. Tests was done by 'crashme'. Here is excerption from Andreas Haumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> report. # OSCPU result 11 Linux-2.0 K6crash 0 Lin