Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: Yet another apt/deselect question Date: Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 02:13:24PM -0500 In reply to:Colin Watson Quoting Colin Watson([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:19:45AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > > You didn't update the dselect available

Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Colin Watson
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 11:19:45AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > You didn't update the dselect available list tho, only apt-get's. try > doing your update like this apt-get update && dselect update, which > updates both lists. No need; just run 'dselect update', which does 'apt-get update' itself a

RE: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Gilger.John
this far, the rest is easy. Just don't spazz out on us now, all you have to do is click the send button. Good luck, John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 10:19 AM To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Yet

Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread CinBin3
fucking take me off your mailing list, im sick of getting these fucking emails!

Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Yet another apt/deselect question Date: Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 10:43:23PM -0700 In reply to:Paul Mackinney Quoting Paul Mackinney([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I keep getting the same pattern of behavior from apt and dselect, but I > can't quite figure out what'

Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Paul Mackinney
David Roundy muttered: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:54:24AM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Paul Mackinney wrote: > > > > > My questions are: > > > 1. Why do the unresolved dependancies prevent apt from > > > updating other packages that have nothing to do with

Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread David Roundy
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:54:24AM +0300, Martin Fluch wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Paul Mackinney wrote: > > > My questions are: > > 1. Why do the unresolved dependancies prevent apt from > > updating other packages that have nothing to do with these? > > apt-get will tell you why, if

Re: Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Martin Fluch
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Paul Mackinney wrote: > My questions are: > 1. Why do the unresolved dependancies prevent apt from > updating other packages that have nothing to do with these? apt-get will tell you why, if you force it to install it with apt-get install > 2. Why isn't smbfs

Yet another apt/deselect question

2001-08-28 Thread Paul Mackinney
I keep getting the same pattern of behavior from apt and dselect, but I can't quite figure out what's happening. Can someone explain what's going on? I'm running Woody. When I apt-get update; apt-get install, I always get the following message: 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remo