n their own way
-Steve
> Alex
>
> On Thu, 23 Jul 1998, Rick Fadler wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm assuming with all the year 2000 compliance hype that there
> > must be a document somewhere describing the year 2000 issues
> > related t
u, 23 Jul 1998, Rick Fadler wrote:
> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 10:21:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Rick Fadler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Year 2000 compliance
> Resent-Date: 23 Jul 1998 17:22:49 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.or
On Sat, Jul 25, 1998 at 09:17:51PM -0700, Alexander wrote:
> Any and all UNIX systems are fully Y2K compliant, as long as the hardware
I think this statement is naive. Although the kernel may represent
all time values as time_t, you cannot guarantee that all applications
do, and since there are ra
o: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Year 2000 compliance
> Resent-Date: 23 Jul 1998 18:04:54 -
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
> *-Rick Fadler (23 Jul)
> |
> | Does anyone have any
*-Rick Fadler (23 Jul)
|
| Does anyone have any information on this?
|
http://www.debian.org/news#19980104
--
Brian
Mechanical Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purdue University http://www.ecn.purdue.edu/~servis
--
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubsc
Hi,
I'm assuming with all the year 2000 compliance hype that there
must be a document somewhere describing the year 2000 issues
related to specific Debian releases of linux.
Specifically, we have built an embedded system using Debian
version 1.3. Being an embedded system, we've strippe
6 matches
Mail list logo
