Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-04 Thread Geoff D
--- John Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Brian Nelson wrote: > > > Try adding the sources.list line: > > > > deb http://people.debian.org/~nidd/debian/ > unstable/ > > > > and then apt-get install openoffice. That should > work, if you're > > running unstable anyway (and possibly woody, bu

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-04 Thread John Foster
Brian Nelson wrote: > Try adding the sources.list line: > > deb http://people.debian.org/~nidd/debian/ unstable/ > > and then apt-get install openoffice. That should work, if you're > running unstable anyway (and possibly woody, but probably not potato). - I

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Brian Nelson
"Kurt Yoder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joachim Trinkwitz said: > > "Karsten M. Self" writes: > > > >> on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >> wrote: > >> > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office > >> > package to be had as a deb? I was thinking

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Jeronimo Pellegrini
On Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 04:44:26PM +0100, Joachim Trinkwitz wrote: > > AFAIK&C: no. > > Yes, it is: put the following line in your sources.list > >deb http://www.openoffice.de/debian/ potato main > > then say: > ># apt-get update ; apt-get install openoffice > > and more than 75 MB of

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Kurt Yoder
Joachim Trinkwitz said: > "Karsten M. Self" writes: > >> on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >> wrote: >> > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office >> > package to be had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to >> > install it that way rather th

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-03-01 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
"Karsten M. Self" writes: > on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office package to be > > had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to install it that way rather > > than installing the OpenOffice.org b

Re: YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-02-26 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Fri, Feb 22, 2002, Timothy R. Butler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office package to be > had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to install it that way rather > than installing the OpenOffice.org binary which doesn't use package > m

YaOOQ (Yet another Open Office Question)

2002-02-22 Thread Timothy R. Butler
This may sound stupid, but is there an up-to-date Open Office package to be had as a deb? I was thinking it might be nice to install it that way rather than installing the OpenOffice.org binary which doesn't use package management. Thanks, Tim -- -