On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 10:36:21AM -0700, Anthony Lau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 01:04:38PM -0400, Terry Warner wrote:
> > I was wondering if anyone else uses the xmatrix xscreensaver, and has
> > noticed a major increase in cpu usage at times when its running:
> Depending on your CPU, it co
on Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 01:04:38PM -0400, Terry Warner ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone else uses the xmatrix xscreensaver, and has noticed
> a major increase in cpu usage at times when its running:
>
> This is from a top command
>
> 4196 keerf 18 10 1556 1556 1224
On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 01:04:38PM -0400, Terry Warner wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone else uses the xmatrix xscreensaver, and has noticed
> a major increase in cpu usage at times when its running:
>
> This is from a top command
>
> 4196 keerf 18 10 1556 1556 1224 R N 88.0 0.1 0:5
No, I don't think that is normal. Running xmatrix in a normal window, I get
0.5 cpu usage (ps aux | grep "xmatrix"). Maybe fullscreen it is a little
more, but it can't be that much. I'm running 2.4.9 on a P3 850.
Bye,
David
P.S. Since 2.4.10 is out, maybe you want to upgrade and check if it wa
I was wondering if anyone else uses the xmatrix xscreensaver, and has noticed a
major increase in cpu usage at times when its running:
This is from a top command
4196 keerf 18 10 1556 1556 1224 R N 88.0 0.1 0:58 xmatrix
is 88% cpu normal for that?
I'm running debian unstable
2.4.9-
5 matches
Mail list logo