Bruce Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 10 Jun 2001, Glyn Millington wrote:
> <...>
> > Well I ran Xemacs as root and did some upgrading with it's packaging
> > system and it doesn't appear to have done any harm ;-) Maybe we should
> > just have assumed that apt-get is just too damned good to
On 10 Jun 2001, Glyn Millington wrote:
<...>
> Well I ran Xemacs as root and did some upgrading with it's packaging
> system and it doesn't appear to have done any harm ;-) Maybe we should
> just have assumed that apt-get is just too damned good to be thrown by
> Xemacs' antics!
The only time you
Giulio Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Glyn Millington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Xemacs has it's own packaging system for upgrading component packages.
> > Does using it compromise the debian system and foul up any future
> > apt-gettery I might wish to try?
> >
> > I feel sure ther
Glyn Millington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Xemacs has it's own packaging system for upgrading component packages.
> Does using it compromise the debian system and foul up any future
> apt-gettery I might wish to try?
>
> I feel sure there must be a "Debian way" on this - any suggestions?
>
>
Xemacs has it's own packaging system for upgrading component packages.
Does using it compromise the debian system and foul up any future
apt-gettery I might wish to try?
I feel sure there must be a "Debian way" on this - any suggestions?
Glyn
--
so here we are then..
5 matches
Mail list logo