Hello!
On Mon, Aug 09, 2004 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Nicolaus Kedegren wrote:
> Why in heavens name did Xfree86 change their license? Was it the
> previous license too restrictive? Sponsors needed/wanted the ability to
> incorporate proprietary code?
> Waste of BW probably, but does anybody know?
In
* Anders Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-09 12:20] wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Brian Nelson wrote:
> | On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:39AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> |>On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> |>
> |>>The d-i team is h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Nelson wrote:
| On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:39AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
|>On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
|>
|>>The d-i team is having nightmares right now because packages they depend
|>>on keep changing.
|>
|
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 10:21:39AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> > The d-i team is having nightmares right now because packages they depend
> > on keep changing.
>
> What ever happened to the idea of a "freeze"?
I seem to recall
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 06:58:57PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> The d-i team is having nightmares right now because packages they depend
> on keep changing.
What ever happened to the idea of a "freeze"?
--
Carl Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jabootu's Minister of Proofreading
http:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 05:02:09 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more platforms than
ever before, m
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:04:31PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> >On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
> >>Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than
On Sun, 08 Aug 2004 05:02:09 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Chris Metzler wrote:
>>On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
>>John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more platforms than
>>>ever before, more packages than ev
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Brian Nelson wrote:
Mark my words, Sarge+1 will not take 3 or 4 years to release. 1 to 1.5
years is my estimate. 2 years, tops.
How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more
On Sat, 07 Aug 2004 21:04:31 +0800
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Nelson wrote:
>>
>> Mark my words, Sarge+1 will not take 3 or 4 years to release. 1 to 1.5
>> years is my estimate. 2 years, tops.
>
>
> How do you justify that pov? At present, we have more platforms than
> e
Brian Nelson wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than Debian will with
Sarge when it's released, and Sarge++ is probably three or four years
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
>
> Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
> Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than Debian will with
> Sarge when it's released, and Sarge++ is probably three or four years away.
Mark my
On Sat, Aug 07, 2004 at 09:20:28AM +0800, John Summerfield wrote:
> Other vendors switched to X.org at the time of the licence change.
> Presumably they're supporting newer hardware now than Debian will with
> Sarge when it's released, and Sarge++ is probably three or four years away.
Actually,
Florian Ernst wrote:
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:50AM -0500, Nathan Kroll wrote:
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make
Nathan Kroll wrote:
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make xorg the new default x server?
I'm just wondering because it seems odd t
Hello!
On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 11:12:50AM -0500, Nathan Kroll wrote:
> I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
> XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
> converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
> make xorg the new d
On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:12, Nathan Kroll wrote:
> I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
> XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
> converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
> make xorg the new default x server?
>
>
I have recently become aware of the fact that Debian is still using
XFree86 4.3 on all of its releases and seems to have no plans on
converting to xorg. Is this true? Is there development underway for
make xorg the new default x server?
I'm just wondering because it seems odd to me that debian is
18 matches
Mail list logo
