On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 07:19:13PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> Really? Well, I expect XFS has a substitute. If not, it should.
No, it doesn't. XFS will handle journaling issues at boot automagically,
but a real fsck requires a bit of manual intervention. I just went
through this today, and this
On Mon,31.May.10, 03:20:40, Cameron Hutchison wrote:
> lrhorer writes:
>
> >> lrhorer put forth on 5/20/2010 6:09 PM:
> >>>
> >>> How can I obtain the XFS file
> >>> utilities - particularly xfs-repair - under "Squeeze"?
>
> >The simple answer to my original question was, "xfsprogs". D
lrhorer writes:
>> lrhorer put forth on 5/20/2010 6:09 PM:
>>>
>>> How can I obtain the XFS file
>>> utilities - particularly xfs-repair - under "Squeeze"?
>The simple answer to my original question was, "xfsprogs". Doing a
>synaptic search for "xfs" returns far, far too many results t
Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> lrhorer put forth on 5/20/2010 6:09 PM:
>>
>> OK, I'm stumped. I was having some problems which were
>> likely related
>> to the old kernel in Debian "Lenny", so I upgraded to "Squeeze" in
>> order to alleviate the issue, which it apparently has. Now, howe
On 5/23/2010 12:41 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 5/22/2010 8:32 PM:
That's a very odd thing. Thanks for correcting me. I would not have
guessed that file system structure would be dependent on OS word width.
I mean, that seems like a catastrophic implementation/design bug
On 5/23/2010 12:41 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 5/22/2010 8:32 PM:
That's a very odd thing. Thanks for correcting me. I would not have
guessed that file system structure would be dependent on OS word width.
I mean, that seems like a catastrophic implementation/design b
Mark Allums put forth on 5/22/2010 8:32 PM:
> On 5/22/2010 2:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Mark Allums put forth on 5/21/2010 7:37 PM:
>>
>>> 64-bit Knoppix is in the TODO list of Klaus Knopper, but for rescue
>>> purposes, 32-bit should be able to do the job.
>>
>> This is incorrect _if_ the file
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:32 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 5/22/2010 2:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>> Mark Allums put forth on 5/21/2010 7:37 PM:
>>>
>>> 64-bit Knoppix is in the TODO list of Klaus Knopper, but for rescue
>>> purposes, 32-bit should be able to do the job.
>>
>> This is incorrect _if
On 5/22/2010 2:22 AM, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Mark Allums put forth on 5/21/2010 7:37 PM:
64-bit Knoppix is in the TODO list of Klaus Knopper, but for rescue
purposes, 32-bit should be able to do the job.
This is incorrect _if_ the filesystem is large and thus contains 64 bit inode
numbers. If
On Sat,22.May.10, 10:53:43, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
> Both scripts don't seem generic enough to me. Fscking for XFS should
> work as long as you have the relevant tools installed.
Aaargh! s/don't//
Regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.d
On Fri,21.May.10, 19:19:13, Mark Allums wrote:
> Does touch /forcefsck (as root) work?
$ grep forcefsck /etc/init.d/*
/etc/init.d/checkfs.sh: if [ -f /forcefsck ] || grep -s -w -i
"forcefsck" /proc/cmdline
/etc/init.d/checkfs.sh: rm -f /fastboot /forcefsck 2>/dev/null
/etc/init.d/checkr
Mark Allums put forth on 5/21/2010 7:37 PM:
> 64-bit Knoppix is in the TODO list of Klaus Knopper, but for rescue
> purposes, 32-bit should be able to do the job.
This is incorrect _if_ the filesystem is large and thus contains 64 bit inode
numbers. If there is any remote possibility that 64 bit
On 5/20/2010 9:32 PM, Robert Brockway wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Mark Allums wrote:
If not, then a live CD will be needed, something like Knoppix, be sure
it has XFS support. Just boot the live CD or DVD, and Bob's your uncle.
I was going to suggest a live cdrom too but remember that Debian
On 5/20/2010 9:49 PM, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 05/20/2010 07:59 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
If xfsprogs is installed, then I think fsck will do it, just first run
something like:
tune2fs -C912 /dev/sda3
Except that tune2fs is only for ext[234] filesystems.
Really? Well, I expect XFS has
lrhorer put forth on 5/20/2010 6:09 PM:
>
> OK, I'm stumped. I was having some problems which were likely related
> to the old kernel in Debian "Lenny", so I upgraded to "Squeeze" in
> order to alleviate the issue, which it apparently has. Now, however, I
> need to fsck the main array on
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Mark Allums wrote:
If not, then a live CD will be needed, something like Knoppix, be sure it has
XFS support. Just boot the live CD or DVD, and Bob's your uncle.
I was going to suggest a live cdrom too but remember that Debian has its
own live cdroms. I've been using th
On 05/20/2010 07:59 PM, Mark Allums wrote:
[snip]
If xfsprogs is installed, then I think fsck will do it, just first run
something like:
tune2fs -C912 /dev/sda3
Except that tune2fs is only for ext[234] filesystems.
--
Dissent is patriotic, remember?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user
Thanks!
> It looks like the tool is called "xfs_repair", and is part of the
> "xfsprogs" package.
>
>
http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=xfs_repair&mode=exactfilename&suite=testing&arch=any
>
> Cheers,
> Tyler
>
>
> lrhorer wrote:
>>
>> OK, I'm stum
On 5/20/2010 6:09 PM, lrhorer wrote:
OK, I'm stumped. I was having some problems which were likely related
to the old kernel in Debian "Lenny", so I upgraded to "Squeeze" in
order to alleviate the issue, which it apparently has. Now, however, I
need to fsck the main array on the box,
It looks like the tool is called "xfs_repair", and is part of the "xfsprogs"
package.
http://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=contents&keywords=xfs_repair&mode=exactfilename&suite=testing&arch=any
Cheers,
Tyler
lrhorer wrote:
>
> OK, I'm stumped. I was havi
OK, I'm stumped. I was having some problems which were likely related
to the old kernel in Debian "Lenny", so I upgraded to "Squeeze" in
order to alleviate the issue, which it apparently has. Now, however, I
need to fsck the main array on the box, which is formatted as XFS. The
xfs-repa
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 06:48:27AM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/29/08 06:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
>
> > Anyway, are you just joking or are there serious reasons against XFS? I
> > am not
>
> Yes, it's just Austin Powers and Mo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/29/08 06:32, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote at 2008-04-29 11:34 +0200:
>> On 04/29/08 01:24, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:52:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
> some r
Ron Johnson wrote at 2008-04-29 11:34 +0200:
On 04/29/08 01:24, Alex Samad wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:52:16PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
On 04/28/08 19:22, Alex Samad wrote:
some reason that xfs is not being talked about?
We hate it because Dr. Evil uses it.
has this got something to do
I'm running debian unstable with the latest 2.6.15 kernel with my root on
the XFS filesystem and had a system crash last night (working on debugging
S3 suspend with ehci-hcd). When I tried to load it this morning it had
problems with modprobe (and, come to find out, other critical binaries).
This
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
>
> Knoppix has been XFS-capable for a long time already (first seen it in
> release 3.0, although it might've been earlier).
Sure is and it did work fantastic!
I connected the drives to IDE2 and it receognized them on boot, had all
the xfs utilitie
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:03:02 +0100, Andreas Janssen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Gerald Waugh (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>
> > I need to access XFS just once in a while, will Knoppix handle xfs
> > file system?
>
> Take a look at <http://
Hello
Gerald Waugh (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I need to access XFS just once in a while, will Knoppix handle xfs
> file system?
Take a look at <http://knoppix.net>. Knoppix comes with both 2.4 and 2.6
kernels, so I assume it supports xfs.
best regards
Andreas Janssen
-
Gerald Waugh wrote:
maybe, "Code Maturity Level Options"
Anyway that added more file system options but still no XFS.
Yup, that's the one I was thinking of. Uhm, if it's not there then I'm
out of ideas. That was my one stab in the dark. :) Hit up google next?
--
Steve C. Lamb |
/www.backports.org>.
thanks,
I did find the sources at backports.org,
I need to access XFS just once in a while, will Knoppix handle xfs file
system? I'll search for a Knoppix ISO, unless you know where I can
download one.
Thanks again,
Gerald
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello
Gerald Waugh (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I am running 2.4.19
> I found googling that 2.4.27 has XFS built in...
>
> Please excuse my ignorance, but how would I update my kernel to
> 2.4.27. I have to have XFS so I can save some data from an XFS hard
> drive.
If you only need to access
I am running 2.4.19
I found googling that 2.4.27 has XFS built in...
Please excuse my ignorance, but how would I update my kernel to 2.4.27.
I have to have XFS so I can save some data from an XFS hard drive.
Gerald
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
Steve Lamb wrote:
> It is one of the first options in makeconfig. Well, at least it was when
> I last checked on the 2.4.x series. Not sure if it is in the 2.6.x
> series. Anyway normally it is right next to module support.
started new message and changed the subject...
maybe, "Code Maturity L
On Sat, 8 Feb 2003, Francois Chenais wrote:
> what's the best way to add XFS support in the Linux 2.4.20 kernel ?
> Can I use the kernel-patch-xfs or do it by myself using tools from sgi ?
The easy way is to use the kernel-patch-xfs (in testing for 2.4.20 now), I
think.
Last time I build 2.4.20
Hello,
what's the best way to add XFS support in the Linux 2.4.20 kernel ?
Can I use the kernel-patch-xfs or do it by myself using tools from sgi ?
Thanks
François
msg29422/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Has someone worked on a system to test
performance and quality of NAS/XFS file system ?
I want to test an XFS filesystem on debian LINUX .Actual physical disk
is NAS(Network Atttached Storage) disk.
Problem : How do I test this ?
I have heard that the use NFS V3/V2 protocols would
36 matches
Mail list logo
