Re: XF 4.1 + Vesa == No Modes found

2002-10-08 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.08.1633 +0200]: > X 4.2? Now out in sid. IIRC, this card is supported. I wanted to keep it testing, but it's running X 4.2 from sid now. That fixed the problem -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \ echo ma

Re: XF 4.1 + Vesa == No Modes found

2002-10-08 Thread Stephen Gran
This one time, at band camp, martin f krafft said: > We have a new station here with an nVidia GeForce4, and since XF 4.1 > doesn't support that (yet), I wanted to use the vesa driver. However, > with a standard configuration (vesa as driver, 1024x768, 800x600, > 640x480 as m

Re: XF 4.1 + Vesa == No Modes found

2002-10-08 Thread Robert Ian Smit
* martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08-10-2002 16:05]: > We have a new station here with an nVidia GeForce4, and since XF 4.1 > doesn't support that (yet), I wanted to use the vesa driver. > > Do you have any tips for me? You could, license issues aside, try the N

XF 4.1 + Vesa == No Modes found

2002-10-08 Thread martin f krafft
We have a new station here with an nVidia GeForce4, and since XF 4.1 doesn't support that (yet), I wanted to use the vesa driver. However, with a standard configuration (vesa as driver, 1024x768, 800x600, 640x480 as modes @ 24bpp, and 1024x768 @ 75 Hz as configuration of the LCD), X doesn&#x

XF 4.0.2/testing: won't use new server!

2001-02-13 Thread Paul D. Smith
Hmm. This is baffling me. So, last week I installed XF 4.0.2, but it was having problems with my video card (Nvidia). So, I switched back to the XF 3.3.6 SVGA server, although the rest of my system is still 4.0.2. To the best of my recollection, I switched back simply by modifying the /etc/X11

Re: XF 4.0 PROBLEMS

2001-02-08 Thread Martin Albert
On Mon, 05 Feb 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > XF 4.0 won;t run on my machine. > XFCom_Rage128 Version 1.3/ X Window System > (protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6300) > Release Date: 6 September 1999 As the msg clearly says, you simply don't run an X4 server. Yo

RE: XF 4.0 PROBLEMS

2001-02-05 Thread Glen Snyder
You probably don't want to mix release versions (In other words, if you are going to use woody, then you should have all of your sources pointing to woody or testing). I had the exact same message as you, and fortunately someone was able to help me out last month First you want to do an apt-get ins

XF 4.0 PROBLEMS

2001-02-04 Thread DanSV
Howdy. Seems I have a small problem. XF 4.0 won;t run on my machine. apt-get dist-upgrade does nothing (I am currently listed as woody, yet my sources.list points to stable, unless I am trying to install X of course ;) I have an ATI Xpert 2000. Here is the output once I install task-x

Re: XF 4.0.2 and glide for v3

2001-01-17 Thread Andrea Vettorello
Aaron Van Couwenberghe wrote: > Hi - > > I've been trying to configure drm support for my voodoo3 (hence I'm using > xf4 from unstable), and having very little luck. > > I went through all the configuration questions, insmod'd the 3dfx drm > module, and typed startx. this is what I get: > > (II)

XF 4.0.2 and glide for v3

2001-01-16 Thread Aaron Van Couwenberghe
Hi - I've been trying to configure drm support for my voodoo3 (hence I'm using xf4 from unstable), and having very little luck. I went through all the configuration questions, insmod'd the 3dfx drm module, and typed startx. this is what I get: (II) GLIDE: driver for Glide devices (Voodoo cards

Re: Disabling input devices in XF 4.0.1

2000-12-04 Thread Raphael Deimel
I don't think that X supports runtime loading/unloading of it's modules, but i could be wrong. I just never heard of someone doing it and the modules are all loaded while the server isn't running yet (according to logs). This seems quite obvious In spite it works, please post how it is done as i'

OT: Disabling input devices in XF 4.0.1

2000-12-04 Thread Juergen Fiedler
to a generic X input device. So, my question is: Is there any way to turn the sending of core events of for a particular input device under XF 4.0.1 without restarting X? Thanks in advance, Juergen

more XF 4.0.1 adventures

2000-11-17 Thread Jim Frey
Hello, Since my last post, I now have the keyboard working, after upgrading the debs and patching to 2.4-test10. I still have no mouse, using all the options dexter has. I still have varios screens with a green title bar - one login, two xterms and one clock. I would really appreciate a tip as

Re: Fonts too big in XF 4.01

2000-11-11 Thread Brad
On Fri, Nov 10, 2000 at 02:08:48PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote: > > AFAIK, XF4 defaults to 100dpi, while XF3 defaulted to 75dpi, so fonts > specified using point sizes (1 point = 1/72 in) will be bigger. Some > applications specify fonts using pixel sizes, so they will stay the > same. > > Start X

Re: Fonts too big in XF 4.01

2000-11-11 Thread Ekkehard Kraemer
Hubert Chan wrote: > AFAIK, XF4 defaults to 100dpi, while XF3 defaulted to 75dpi, > Start X with the "-dpi 75" option. > Also, edit your /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 file, and change the order of the > FontPath lines so that the 75dpi directories come before the 100dpi > You may have to change /etc/X1

Re: Fonts too big in XF 4.01

2000-11-10 Thread Hubert Chan
Ekkehard Kraemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello, > > I'm using XFree 4.0.1 (the current packages on a woody system) with a > Voodoo3 2000 in 1280x1024 mode under HELIX Gnome. Everything was just > installed with apt-get, no special fiddling has occured. > > This is my situation with the fo

Fonts too big in XF 4.01

2000-11-10 Thread Ekkehard Kraemer
Hello, I'm using XFree 4.0.1 (the current packages on a woody system) with a Voodoo3 2000 in 1280x1024 mode under HELIX Gnome. Everything was just installed with apt-get, no special fiddling has occured. This is my situation with the fonts: - All "gnomish" fonts (window frame menus, file manage

Re: XF-4.0 .deb packages

2000-03-30 Thread Colin Watson
"Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Do we have .deb packages for 4.0 yet? No. http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/debian-user-0003/msg00973.html -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

XF-4.0 .deb packages

2000-03-30 Thread Robert L. Harris
Do we have .deb packages for 4.0 yet? Anyone got a location? :wq! --- Robert L. Harris| Low quality in a product happens. Senior System Engineer |That doesn't mean it's right and at RnD Co

Is xf available?

1998-10-21 Thread Eric
Is xf (the Tk GUI generator) available in a deb package? -- _ _ | |(_) http://www.iit.edu/~jenseri | _| | | Page me via ICQ at | |___ | | http://wwp.mirabilis.com/19022931 |__/ | or by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED] |__/

Re: XF

1998-03-10 Thread robert havoc pennington
On Tue, 10 Mar 1998, Abou Anber wrote: > who can I fixed the resoltion of Xwindows at begining? > Your preferred resolution should be the first one listed. > down you will find my XF86Config. > > ... > > Subsection "Display" > Depth 8 > # Omit the Modes line for the

XF

1998-03-10 Thread Abou Anber
At the first point of start Xwindows the Screen like Linux (Bebian ) Login Passward at first time it look big size and I change the resolution by cntl+ alt+ + the resolution become smaller again Cntl+ a

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-04 Thread George Bonser
On 02-Sep-97 Craig Sanders wrote: >anyway, that's all beside the point. what i'm really writing to say is: >if you'd like to maintain the package for debian, i'll send you what >i've done so far. Sure, I will take it. I will send you an address where you can put it by anon ftp via private email.

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-03 Thread Orn E. Hansen
On 03-Sep-97 George Bonser wrote: > >Sure, I would like to have a look at it. The version that I currently have >packaged is 1.1 which looks a lot smoother than the older version that I had >and the newer versions are supposed to be even better from what I hear. What I >like is to be able to auto

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-03 Thread George Bonser
On 02-Sep-97 Craig Sanders wrote: > >anyway, that's all beside the point. what i'm really writing to say is: >if you'd like to maintain the package for debian, i'll send you what >i've done so far. Sure, I would like to have a look at it. The version that I currently have packaged is 1.1 which l

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-02 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 31 Aug 1997, George Bonser wrote: > Ok, folks, I have taken a stab at making a debian package and I will > admit that I cheated a bit :) > > I have been using the XF-Mail GUI email package and really like it. I > like it so much that I wanted to share it so I grabbed the .

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-01 Thread Igor Grobman
On Aug 31, Britton wrote > > While on the subject of odd things that I don't begin to understand: since > I fixed my chatscript so my modem hung up when DTR went low (by > initializing the modem with ATZ and AT&D2), my computer occasionally > decides to connect itself to the internet without my do

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-01 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, 31 Aug 1997, Britton wrote: > Aug 31 17:15:04 Beleriand syslogd 1.3-0#11: restart. > Aug 31 17:15:04 Beleriand kernel: klogd 1.3-0, log source = /proc/kmsg > started. > Aug 31 17:15:04 Beleriand syslogd 1.3-0#11: restart. > Aug 31 17:15:04 Beleriand syslogd: select: Bad file number > Aug 3

Re: Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-01 Thread Britton
I thought rc5 was responsible for this, but I guess I had just never looked very closely before. With nothing running but the ordinary Debian stuff (I don't have any deamons running other than the base ones) syslogd uses as much processor time as it can get (60% with rc5 running for example, ~98%

Private XF-Mail package available

1997-09-01 Thread George Bonser
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Ok, folks, I have taken a stab at making a debian package and I will admit that I cheated a bit :) I have been using the XF-Mail GUI email package and really like it. I like it so much that I wanted to share it so I grabbed the .rpm and built a .deb from it