On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 15:46:47 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
> >To try different settings quickly, you can start X like this:
> >
> >startx -- -dpi 84
>
> Aha, that did the trick. And for some reason it didn't affect xterm, etc,
> either. May
On Sat, 22 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 16:21:11 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote:
Your problem might be due to changes in your X server's resolution
settings, which influence the size of the fonts on the screen. You can
check thi
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 17:21:10 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most
everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications are
different. Let's take gaim as an example. The
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 16:21:11 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Florian Kulzer wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 17:21:10 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> >>The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most
> >>everything seems okay except that the fonts
On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 17:21:10 -0700, Nate Eldredge wrote:
> [Note: I would appreciate a personal CC on any replies since this will
> make it easier for me to find them. But don't bother if not convenient.]
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages.
On 4/20/06, Nate Eldredge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Note: I would appreciate a personal CC on any replies since this will
> make it easier for me to find them. But don't bother if not convenient.]
The one time Gmail's behavior is reasonable!
> The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the
[Note: I would appreciate a personal CC on any replies since this will
make it easier for me to find them. But don't bother if not convenient.]
Hi folks,
The other day I upgraded my unstable to get the new X.org packages. Most
everything seems okay except that the fonts in many applications
I have a PC with an AMD Athlon64 chip and Debian unstable, i386 port. My
monitor is 1024x768. It is 328mm by 246mm (17 in).
Today (April 11 2006) X was upgraded in unstable. Now all my fonts are
much bigger.
Some of the lines returned by "xdpinfo" are:
version number:11.0
X.Org version:
Em Sat, 19 Jun 2004 20:30:12 +0200, Micha Feigin escreveu:
> My window key is now recognized under emacs as H-s whatever that means
Hyper.
--
Leandro GuimarÃes Faria Corsetti Dutra +55 (11) 5685 2219
Av Sgto Geraldo Santana, 1100 6/71[EMAIL PROTECTED]
04.674-000 SÃo P
The latest X upgrade in sid seems to have changed the key definitions
for some of the modifiers. Did anyone else notice that?
My window key is now recognized under emacs as H-s whatever that means
and it seems that the alt is also making problems (I don't think it is
recognized as meta under
Graham Campbell wrote:
On Friday 20 February 2004 09:40 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
Graham Campbell wrote:
On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
Graham Campbell wrote:
I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped
scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relev
On Saturday 21 February 2004 19:52, Peter Billson wrote:
> Richard Lyons wrote:
> > Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was following
> > this thread sure the solution would be revealed...
>
> Richard,
> To make the wheel work under X change your /etc/X11/XF86Config file so
>
due to fuzzy thinking and fumble fingers, I no longer have the version that
caused the problem, so I cannot guess what the change was that caused the
problem. However the Mouse configuration entries were the same between the
two!!
Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was followin
Richard Lyons wrote:
> Rats! I've never had a wheel working under linux, and I was following this
> thread sure the solution would be revealed...
Richard,
To make the wheel work under X change your /etc/X11/XF86Config file so
that the line in the Pointer section that now reads:
Protocol
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:57, Graham Campbell wrote:
[...]
> due to fuzzy thinking and fumble fingers, I no longer have the version that
> caused the problem, so I cannot guess what the change was that caused the
> problem. However the Mouse configuration entries were the same between the
> t
On Friday 20 February 2004 09:40 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Graham Campbell wrote:
> > On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
> >>Graham Campbell wrote:
> >>>I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped
> >>>scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant ent
Graham Campbell wrote:
On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
Graham Campbell wrote:
I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped
scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 :
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier
On Friday 20 February 2004 08:14 pm, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Graham Campbell wrote:
> > I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped
> > scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from
> > /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 :
> > Section "InputDevice"
> > Identifier
Graham Campbell wrote:
I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped
scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 :
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option
I just applied the latest X upgrades to Woody. My wheel mouse stopped
scrolling (rest works ok). Here is the relevant entries from
/etc/X11/XF86Config-4 :
Section "InputDevice"
Identifier "Configured Mouse"
Driver "mouse"
Option "CorePointer"
This one time, at band camp, Colin Watson said:
> As far as I know, you need at least 2.4.20-pre5 to get DRI with XFree86
> 4.2.
>
> --
> Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
steve@gashuffer:~$ uname -a
Linux gashuffer.lobefin.net 2.4.20-rc1 #1 SMP Sun Nov 3 14:05:24
On Sat, Nov 02, 2002 at 05:31:33PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> Up until today, I had DRI support with my ATI Rage 128 card, using the
> ati driver and X 4.1. Today's upgrade (running sarge) noticeably
> dropped my frame rate, so I did some looking around.
[...]
> This implies too ol
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 02 November 2002 23:31, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
> Up until today, I had DRI support with my ATI Rage 128 card, using
> the ati driver and X 4.1. Today's upgrade (running sarge) noticeably
> dropped my frame rate, so I did some loo
Hello all,
Up until today, I had DRI support with my ATI Rage 128 card, using the
ati driver and X 4.1. Today's upgrade (running sarge) noticeably
dropped my frame rate, so I did some looking around.
steve@gashuffer:~$ glxinfo
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: No
Andrew M.A. Cater said:
> effect. I may have a "mixture" of 3.3.6 and 4.0.9 packages. Help
> me clear this one up to restore my X please!
ive had mixtures before too.. i usually remove everything
and purge everything and apt-get clean and reinstall.
run through the package listing and look fo
On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 09:22:39PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> Losing patience, I installed a Matrox Millenium 2MB card and the XFree
> 4 servers. Now, I get an immediate error starting X "can't open socket
> - - make sure no other X is running" or words to that effect. I may have
> a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Problem: (work) I have a Compaq Deskpro 5200MMX 200M Pentium machine -
lots of software on the disk, lots of users. The disk was originally
in a Compaq Deskpro P166 - I upgraded hardware and memory to a "new"
machine with new CD-RW etc.
Th
>
> I don't know if you care about binary drivers but the last X upgrade broke
> 3D/DRI/GLX in the nvidia's driver.
>
you might have to change the display card driver to nvidia from nv. I had to do
that as well as install the nvidia driver packages as mentioned by
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001 13:27:19 -0500, Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Branden> Can someone who uses NVIDIA's binary-only drivers with Debian's X
Branden> packages help this guy out?
Pedro,
You should download NVIDIA_GLX-1.0-.tar.gz from NVidia's
website (http://www.nvidia.c
more than sheer
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |incompetence! -- J. L. Rizzo II
--- Begin Message ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I don't know if you care about binary drivers but the last X upgrade broke
3D/DRI/GLX in the nvidia's driver.
glxinfo show
Thus spake Stephen Gran:
> Hello all,
> I'm having a problemthat I just saw the other day. I just upgraded X to
> 4.1.0-7 I believe, and it fails on startup. I get the error "no such
> file or directory" when it looks for ~/.xsession, and I remeber seeing
> that this is related to a line in one o
Hello all,
I'm having a problemthat I just saw the other day. I just upgraded X to
4.1.0-7 I believe, and it fails on startup. I get the error "no such
file or directory" when it looks for ~/.xsession, and I remeber seeing
that this is related to a line in one of the new configutration files.
~/.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote:
> On Friday 16 February 2001 13:28, David Purton wrote:
> > I'v solved this prob by changing this line in xdm-config from true to
> > false:
> >
> > ! All displays should use authorization.
> > ! X terminals may not be configured that way, so they will req
On Friday 16 February 2001 13:28, David Purton wrote:
> I'v solved this prob by changing this line in xdm-config from true to
> false:
>
> ! All displays should use authorization.
> ! X terminals may not be configured that way, so they will require
> ! individualized resource settings.
> DisplayMan
(someone please forward this to the original poster)
please try to enable an x font server as well as portmap/sunrpc
services, and see if the problem persists. if it does, then no clue.
if the above solves it, then welcome to my boat. we can team up to
find a solution...
martin
[greetings from t
I'v solved this prob by changing this line in xdm-config from true to
false:
! All displays should use authorization.
! X terminals may not be configured that way, so they will require
! individualized resource settings.
DisplayManager*authorize: false
but it suggests it should be true - w
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Martin Albert wrote:
> On Thursday 15 February 2001 13:42, David Purton wrote:
> > mmm - I knew one problem was hoping for too much.
> >
> > I think I remember a post about this before but I can't find it in
> > the archives.
> >
> > Since upgrading to Woody and X 4 xdm takes
mmm - I knew one problem was hoping for too much.
I think I remember a post about this before but I can't find it in the
archives.
Since upgrading to Woody and X 4 xdm takes a lng time to start (like
a minute or so)
Does anyone know how to fix this?
---
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 01, 2000 at 07:46:42PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Edit things in /etc/X11/xdm - I think it was pretty obvois IIRC. Oddly, it
> was decided that xdm is some kind of security risk - I personally don't
> see why..
>
> Jason
The config file in question is /etc/X11/xdm/Xaccess.
B
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, David Karlin wrote:
> I'm guessing that some new configuration file might have been inserted
> during the X upgrade. Am I on the right track? Has anyone experienced
> this, or know how to fix it?
Edit things in /etc/X11/xdm - I think it was pretty obvois I
might have been inserted
during the X upgrade. Am I on the right track? Has anyone experienced
this, or know how to fix it?
Thanks.
--
David Karlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Powered by Debian GNU/Linux
I upgraded Slink and found that the menu entry for Communicator no
longer worked. There is a link in
/usr/lib/netscape/46/communicator/communicator-smotif ->
../../base-4/wrapper. That directory isn't there anymore.
I removed the link, re-ran update-menus and the menu
/Apps/Net/Communicator now
On Wed, Oct 22, 1997 at 12:05:16PM +0100, G. Kapetanios wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >From my mirror I see that the setup for X has changed considerably. I am
> wondering what is the correct procedure to upgrade. I have X 3.3-4
> Here is what i think i should do.
>
> First upgrade xlib6 to 3.3.1-1, then
Hi,
>From my mirror I see that the setup for X has changed considerably. I am
wondering what is the correct procedure to upgrade. I have X 3.3-4
Here is what i think i should do.
First upgrade xlib6 to 3.3.1-1, then remove xlib6-dev and everything that
depnds on it and install xlib6-altdev, the
44 matches
Mail list logo
