Re: X under heavy load

2005-10-15 Thread Jan T. Kim
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:29:26PM +0200, Marc Br?nink wrote: > Hiho, > > I'm generating a map. So it has nothing to do with X. However does > someone have a clue how to track this down? > > Thanks > Marc > > > On Freitag, Okt 14, 2005, at 20:45 Europe/Berlin, Antonio Paiva wrote: > > >Marc,

Re: X under heavy load

2005-10-14 Thread Olle Eriksson
On Friday 14 October 2005 18.54, Marc Brünink wrote: > Hi, > > if I put my 500 Mhz machine under heavy load, X doesn't respond > anymore. Actually it works, but it's much to slow. I want to do some > hard calculations in background AND use X. I guess this should be > possible, shouldn't it? > I try

Re: X under heavy load

2005-10-14 Thread Marc Brünink
Hiho, I'm generating a map. So it has nothing to do with X. However does someone have a clue how to track this down? Thanks Marc On Freitag, Okt 14, 2005, at 20:45 Europe/Berlin, Antonio Paiva wrote: Marc, I don't know exactly what you are using but I can tell you that I frequently do co

Re: X under heavy load

2005-10-14 Thread Antonio Paiva
Marc, I don't know exactly what you are using but I can tell you that I frequently do computationally demanding tasks in my work desktop and home laptop (both running Debian Sarge) and X continues working fine. While I'm waiting I frequently browse the web without major changes in speed. Mayb

X under heavy load

2005-10-14 Thread Marc Brünink
Hi, if I put my 500 Mhz machine under heavy load, X doesn't respond anymore. Actually it works, but it's much to slow. I want to do some hard calculations in background AND use X. I guess this should be possible, shouldn't it? I tryed to use nice 20 heavy-load-process but this didn't help a bi