>
> Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 21:36:31 +0200
> From: Sven Arvidsson
>
> On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 19:54 +0100, Alle Meije Wink wrote:
> > I am running Jessie on a toshiba laptop with these specs
> > Hardware: i7 5500u
> > Graphics: Intel HD graphics 5500
> > Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt2
On Tue, 2016-03-29 at 19:54 +0100, Alle Meije Wink wrote:
> I am running Jessie on a toshiba laptop with these specs
>
> Hardware: i7 5500u
> Graphics: Intel HD graphics 5500
> Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u4 (2016-02-29)
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> I had to turn of power savi
I am running Jessie on a toshiba laptop with these specs
Hardware: i7 5500u
Graphics: Intel HD graphics 5500
Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u4 (2016-02-29)
x86_64 GNU/Linux
I had to turn of power saving options (the screen can still be blanked
after a few minutes but hibern
seems that the X hangs a lot now and then. I had to use
CTRL_BACKSPACE killing and restarting the X.
I was using Xfce4 as the desktop, the kernel is 2.6.22-2-686.
It's annoying that the X freezes and can't do anything until restart the X.
It's bug in xfwm4. Install the vers
On Nov 10, 2007 3:54 AM, Michael Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HI All:
>
> I have Lenny/SID on my DELL D630 lap.
>
> But it seems that the X hangs a lot now and then. I had to use
> CTRL_BACKSPACE killing and restarting the X.
> I was using Xfce4 as the desktop,
HI All:
I have Lenny/SID on my DELL D630 lap.
But it seems that the X hangs a lot now and then. I had to use
CTRL_BACKSPACE killing and restarting the X.
I was using Xfce4 as the desktop, the kernel is 2.6.22-2-686.
It's annoying that the X freezes and can't do anything until res
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:08:39AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> > Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
> > switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
> > running tcpdump when X s
On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:28:56 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> Same behavior (I am using wdm and no xdmcp and the no listen on tcp
> switch). It seems like /usr/X11R6/bin/X is whats causing the trouble,
> running tcpdump when X startx shows the name lookup BTW:
>
you know, I think we're barking up the
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 01:49:29AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> >
> > BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
> > on this:
> >
> > [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
> > interface to
Incoming from Steven Satelle:
> On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
> >
> > [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
> > interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
> >
> > The problem is that it seems that a few other things seem
On Mon, 12 Jul 2004 17:58:40 +0300, Micha Feigin wrote:
>
> BTW I got the following reply after I tried reporting a bug on netbase
> on this:
>
> [...] this is how it's supposed to work. host(1) is an
> interface to the resolver library, which does not use /etc/hosts by design.
>
> The problem
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 12:06:41AM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> > Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
> > nameserver is not reachable then ping works but
> > host returns
> > 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
> > Nameserver not reachable
> > litshi.luna.loc
> Ping uses the hosts file but host seems to ignore it. So if the
> nameserver is not reachable then ping works but
> host returns
> 192.168.0.1 connect: Network is unreachable
> Nameserver not reachable
> litshi.luna.local A record not found, try again
> my /etc/hosts has the following lines:
>
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 22:53:09 +0200, Otto Wyss wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>>
>> no, its caused by the machine trying to resolve its name over eth0
>> AFAIR. If the network is up. If you've configured the network, you've
>> set a hostname, so it is trying to re
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 08:33:15PM +0100, Steven Satelle wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
>
> > --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> >
> >> I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
> >> if anyone else experiences it too.
> >
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 20:18:19 +0100, Thomas Adam wrote:
> --- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
>
>> I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
>> if anyone else experiences it too.
>
> Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
> ther
--- Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
> if anyone else experiences it too.
Have a look at the bugpage for 'xserver-xfree86'. If it isn't listed
there, then maybe consider filing one.
-- Thomas Adam
=
"The Linux
I'm not sure yet on what package to report this bug, but was wondering
if anyone else experiences it too.
When starting X with a configured network and no cable, it hangs for
about 30 seconds until it starts (which is consistent with network
timeouts). If I disable the network or not configure the
Hello
About a week ago I posted this problem on the debian-laptop
list, unfortunately I received no response so I am having a
2nd try with this posting on both the laptop & the
debian-user lists. Also I suspect that this might be a
generic nvidia problem.
Recently I have noticed that whenever I l
On Sat, Sep 07, 2002 at 08:01:54PM -0400, Paul Galbraith wrote:
> I've tried running xfree86cfg, and XFree86 -configure. Both cause my
> screen to go blank, and after several minutes wait, nothing else
> happens. I've tried hitting CTRL-ALT-F2 (F3/F4, etc), as well as
> CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE and C
I've tried running xfree86cfg, and XFree86 -configure. Both cause my
screen to go blank, and after several minutes wait, nothing else
happens. I've tried hitting CTRL-ALT-F2 (F3/F4, etc), as well as
CTRL-ALT-BACKSPACE and CTRL-ALT-ESC to try to get to a terminal where I
can kill the configure p
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 19:45, Jaye Inabnit ke6sls wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Monday 02 September 2002 12:28 pm, Mariano Kamp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am not sure how to describe this problem properly. Basically my machine
> > hangs every now and then. Sometim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 02 September 2002 12:28 pm, Mariano Kamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure how to describe this problem properly. Basically my machine
> hangs every now and then. Sometimes it takes 20 minutes, sometimes five and
> it is also sometimes runnin
I found out that the machine is still pingable after X hangs.
Mariano
On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 21:28, Mariano Kamp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am not sure how to describe this problem properly. Basically my machine hangs
>every now and then. Sometimes it takes 20 minutes, sometimes five an
Hi,
I am not sure how to describe this problem properly. Basically my machine hangs
every now and then. Sometimes it takes 20 minutes, sometimes five and it is also
sometimes running for 60 minutes until it hangs.
Hangs means, I cannot do anything anymore. At least CTRL+ALT+DEL/BS and CTRL+AL
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Brenda J. Butler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:09:04PM -0600, dave mallery wrote:
> > i just tried startx with the FB option uncommented. the machine did not
> > freeze, however, i am back to the "no screens found" error which led me to
> > comment it in the first pla
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:09:04PM -0600, dave mallery wrote:
> i just tried startx with the FB option uncommented. the machine did not
> freeze, however, i am back to the "no screens found" error which led me to
> comment it in the first place.
The "no screens" seems less broken than a complet
hi scott
victory!
a friend suggested that i comment out the load for dri in the XF86config-4
file.
itsa works
now maybe i can come up with a post-mortem that will explain this
thanks so much for your ear and your help.
dave
--
Dave Mallery, K5EN (r/h 7.2 krud; debian woody)
PO B
On 30 Apr 2002, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 10:12, dave mallery wrote:
>
> > hi scott
> >
> > hardware: pIII-550E 256mb parity aha2940uw G200-16mb
>
> Is this a laptop?
> Other than it being a laptop it looks like very normal and well
> supported hardware.
not a laptop. just
On Tue, 2002-04-30 at 10:12, dave mallery wrote:
> hi scott
>
> hardware: pIII-550E 256mb parity aha2940uw G200-16mb
Is this a laptop?
Other than it being a laptop it looks like very normal and well
supported hardware.
> kernel currently: stock kernel-image 2.4.18_686-5 (same problem with -4
On 29 Apr 2002, Scott Henson wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 12:58, dave mallery wrote:
> > hi
> >
> > i posted this the other day, but no response.
> >
> > X was perfect under woody and 2.2.20. after installing both a custom
> > 2.4.18 and the two latest kernel images, the same symptoms rema
On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 12:58, dave mallery wrote:
> hi
>
> i posted this the other day, but no response.
>
> X was perfect under woody and 2.2.20. after installing both a custom
> 2.4.18 and the two latest kernel images, the same symptoms remain.
>
> when you startx or let gdm start, the scre
hi
i posted this the other day, but no response.
X was perfect under woody and 2.2.20. after installing both a custom
2.4.18 and the two latest kernel images, the same symptoms remain.
when you startx or let gdm start, the screen blanks, flickers and the
machine is totally hung. in my previ
hi
starting x or gdm on my new kernel image hangs the system... no response
to any stimulus... reboot needed.
the XF86config-4 file works perfectly with 2.2.20 custom or kernel-image.
startx 2>xlog leaves no trace.
/var/log/XFree86.0.log is created. it runs to the end. the only error
repo
> I've got VESA to work now. I had to set it to use a bpp of 8, and
> then it came up fine. My computer has been up for 15 hours now, and I've
> been in X all this time; so I guess things are working alright (Although
> none of my consoles work now. *sigh* Something about the refresh rate
> bei
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Kevin Ross wrote:
> > What's funny is that VESA comes up right, it detects my card
> > beautifully; but then it complains that there aren't any screens.
>
> Sounds like it can't find a matching resolution and refresh rate. The VESA
> driver is limited in what resolutions an
> What's funny is that VESA comes up right, it detects my card
> beautifully; but then it complains that there aren't any screens.
Sounds like it can't find a matching resolution and refresh rate. The VESA
driver is limited in what resolutions and refresh rates it will support.
In Section "Moni
On Thu, 17 May 2001, Kevin Ross wrote:
> > I am running Sid with XFree86 4.0.3-3 on Linux 2.4.4. My
> > predicament, you see, is that my X server seems to hang the machine
> > whenever it fancies. I have maximum uptimes of about 15 to 20 minutes
> > of usage. If I don't touch my X server, it's
> I am running Sid with XFree86 4.0.3-3 on Linux 2.4.4. My
> predicament, you see, is that my X server seems to hang the machine
> whenever it fancies. I have maximum uptimes of about 15 to 20 minutes
> of usage. If I don't touch my X server, it's fine. If I don't use
> my X server, it's fine.
Hello,
I seem to have a small, and mysterious problem.
I am running Sid with XFree86 4.0.3-3 on Linux 2.4.4. My
predicament, you see, is that my X server seems to hang the machine
whenever it fancies. I have maximum uptimes of about 15 to 20 minutes
of usage. If I don't touch
on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 09:54:55AM -0800, Aaron Van Couwenberghe ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greetings -
>
> I set up X 4 recently, and have finally succeeded in making the tdfx drm
> module cooperate with me... It works great, except for one thing: if I leave
> the room for any period of time
Greetings -
I set up X 4 recently, and have finally succeeded in making the tdfx drm
module cooperate with me... It works great, except for one thing: if I leave
the room for any period of time, say an hour, I can't expect my system to be
functioning when I come back.
I can't quite put my fin
- Forwarded message from Kurt Swigart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:31:49 -0800
From: Kurt Swigart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: X hangs modem/ppp
Organization: Swigart Engineering, Keyport, WA
I am still having troubl
On Thu, Jan 27, 2000 at 05:34:33AM -0800, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
>
> --- Kurt Swigart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > My ppp connection quits working when I start X. It doesn't happen all
> > the time, just about 60%. Stopping X does not make it better.
>
> How heavy is the overall system lo
--- Kurt Swigart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My ppp connection quits working when I start X. It doesn't happen all
> the time, just about 60%. Stopping X does not make it better.
How heavy is the overall system load?
> The problem seems to be with the modem (or the serial port), since even
fire up gpm (console mouse driver/server) start using it to copy/paste and
see if that does the same, if it does then it is for sure a
conflict(doesnt have to be an IRQ conflict it can be an I/O conflict)
if not..not sure what to reccomend, it is a hardware modem right and not a
winmodem ..while m
My ppp connection quits working when I start X. It doesn't happen all
the time, just about 60%. Stopping X does not make it better. The
problem seems to be with the modem (or the serial port), since even if
I kill pppd, I cannot communicate with the modem. I can't even send it
"ATZ". I have fo
Hello everybody,
since a few days I'm experiences "hangs" when I leave my machine
unattended
for some hours. What exactly happens is that my mouse pointer doesn't move
anymore. By using the keyboard combi's in WindowMaker (both .51.2 and .53
have the problem) I'm able to close all programs and shu
48 matches
Mail list logo
