Re: X fonts dead after upgrade

2003-03-02 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 18:01, Alan Chandler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Saturday 01 Mar 2003 8:42 pm, Alex Malinovich wrote: > > > My XF86Config did get updated but the fontpath lines weren't changed. > > After some testing, I think I've found the problem though

Re: X fonts dead after upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 01 Mar 2003 8:42 pm, Alex Malinovich wrote: > My XF86Config did get updated but the fontpath lines weren't changed. > After some testing, I think I've found the problem though I don't know > how to find any more information on it. Apparent

Re: X fonts dead after upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Alex Malinovich
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 08:27, Alan Chandler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Saturday 01 Mar 2003 9:22 am, Alex Malinovich wrote: > > I just did a Sid upgrade yesterday, and now all of my basic X apps and, > > apparently, all of my GTK1 apps are using REALLY REALLY ug

Re: X fonts dead after upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Alan Chandler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 01 Mar 2003 9:22 am, Alex Malinovich wrote: > I just did a Sid upgrade yesterday, and now all of my basic X apps and, > apparently, all of my GTK1 apps are using REALLY REALLY ugly fonts. All > of my GTK2 apps look fine however. These fonts

X fonts dead after upgrade

2003-03-01 Thread Alex Malinovich
I just did a Sid upgrade yesterday, and now all of my basic X apps and, apparently, all of my GTK1 apps are using REALLY REALLY ugly fonts. All of my GTK2 apps look fine however. These fonts are bad to the point of unreadability. In evolution, for example, there's no difference between bold and reg