Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:52:46PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
Oops; guess not. I just logged in as root and fired up X; same message.
Have you done anything special to your machine? Played with PAM,
grsecurity, capabilities, etc?
-rob
Running Testing, so recently upgrad
On Sun, Nov 10, 2002 at 04:52:46PM -0600, Kent West wrote:
> Oops; guess not. I just logged in as root and fired up X; same message.
Have you done anything special to your machine? Played with PAM,
grsecurity, capabilities, etc?
-rob
msg12486/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Kent West wrote:
Rupert wrote:
On 10 Nov 2002 22:40:41 +0100
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I run startx, this warning pops up before X starts:
X: warning; process set to priority 0 instead of requested priority -10
Why?
I think it's because you're not
Rupert wrote:
On 10 Nov 2002 22:40:41 +0100
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When I run startx, this warning pops up before X starts:
X: warning; process set to priority 0 instead of requested priority -10
Why?
I think it's because you're not running as root
On 10 Nov 2002 22:40:41 +0100
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I run startx, this warning pops up before X starts:
>
> X: warning; process set to priority 0 instead of requested priority -10
>
> Why?
>
I think it's because you're not running as roo
When I run startx, this warning pops up before X starts:
X: warning; process set to priority 0 instead of requested priority -10
Why?
Thanks!
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
6 matches
Mail list logo