> > From what you describe, and this seems to be your assessment as well,
> > it is unlikely that this is a hardware problem. And there's never been
> > any instance at all of a computer error occurring in a 9000 series.
> (am I missing a reference with the "9000 series"?)
Oops. That's HAL, rig
> Do you happen to remember what you did just before it stopped working? Or
> do you at least remember whether you had just upgraded or recompiled your
> kernel? This would most likely be the easiest route to identifying the
> problem.
Right. I have a kernel built with identical options on anoth
2 matches
Mail list logo
