On Wed, Mar 03, 1999 at 11:16:49PM -0500, Alec Smith wrote:
> No big traps that I can think of. I'm actually running NT+Linux on this
> very machine. I prefer copying the Linux boot sector and using the NT boot
> loader. Its nice being able to use the arrow keys and not have to type
> anything as L
The problems lie more with than with Linux. Your current setup should
work if you just install NT over 95. One problem with that is that NT
will not work off FAT 32 partitions. If you want long file names wih NT
you have to install NTFS. The problem with NTFS is that there is only
read only sup
No big traps that I can think of. I'm actually running NT+Linux on this
very machine. I prefer copying the Linux boot sector and using the NT boot
loader. Its nice being able to use the arrow keys and not have to type
anything as Lilo can require.
Check out the Linux+NT-HOWTO for details.
At 0
I have Windows 95 installed with Linux, four partitions, everything is
fine. I'd prefer to be 100% Linux, but something just came up where
I'll have to use Windows a bit.
I've got a copy of Windows NT that came with my computer, and I've had
NT plus Linux running happily together under a scheme
4 matches
Mail list logo
