Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-17 Thread darrell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/01/2002 (10:04) : here is some pix of my desktop nori, btw, wmaker is cool and pretty damn hard to beat, i have tried many desktops, gimp 1.2 runs real You mean you have tried several windowmanagers. Have you tried sawfish?

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-17 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach nori heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0729 +0100]: > it doesn't look like it to me -- that refers to saving wmaker defaults > improperly "if /tmp is on another disk, partition, or filesystem" -- > which mine's not. your /tmp is very much on another partition, and it's a filesy

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-17 Thread Preben Randhol
darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 17/01/2002 (10:04) : > here is some pix of my desktop nori, btw, wmaker is cool and > pretty damn hard to beat, i have tried many desktops, gimp 1.2 runs real You mean you have tried several windowmanagers. Have you tried sawfish? Preben -- () Join the wo

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-17 Thread Nori Heikkinen
on Thu, 17 Jan 2002 02:45:23AM +0100, marTin insinuated: > also sprach darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0237 +0100]: > > workspace -> appearance -> themes -> debian > > oh, that's right... forgot about that ... thanks for the reminder! > > from the debian menu's, just a footnote, these me

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-17 Thread Nori Heikkinen
on Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:52:51PM -0600, DvB insinuated: > Speaking of uneditable prefs under wmaker, I decided to check it out > recently and ran into bug #108903. Not sure from the original > message, but this might be the cause of the problem mentioned... it doesn't look like it to me -- that refe

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-17 Thread DvB
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > also sprach darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0237 +0100]: > > workspace -> appearance -> themes -> debian > > oh, that's right... > > > from the debian menu's, just a footnote, these menus provided > > for windowmaker under debian seem to be u

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach darrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0237 +0100]: > workspace -> appearance -> themes -> debian oh, that's right... > from the debian menu's, just a footnote, these menus provided > for windowmaker under debian seem to be uneditable from the > windowmaker control panel, also true.

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-16 Thread darrell
workspace -> appearance -> themes -> debian from the debian menu's, just a footnote, these menus provided for windowmaker under debian seem to be uneditable from the windowmaker control panel, is it the deregular to post pictures of our desktop - that is good fun - madduck is weird, i wis

Re: WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach nori heikkinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.17.0119 +0100]: > things progress fine until i attempt to change the background, or add > more desktops than just one, or make some moderately large change to > the appearance of X. Before, it was fine, with grey menus and red top > bars, jus

WindowMaker is ugly!!

2002-01-16 Thread Nori Heikkinen
i'm playing with my configuration files for version 4 of X, using WindowMaker, having somehow erased my old settings -- about 5 days *after* i switched versions. whatever; i don't care anymore why this happened, but i'd like to be able to get things back to where they were. things progress fine