Re: WindowMaker Rocks!! ;-) (Was: FW: OT : GUI Interfaces)

2001-04-12 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 02:02:05AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > I prefer to leave raw function keys to low-level functions -- menus, > etc. Good point. That's why I leave F1-8 free, but the only conflict I've had with F9/F10 has been with running MS Visual C++ over a VNC session, which is a fl

Re: WindowMaker Rocks!! ;-) (Was: FW: OT : GUI Interfaces)

2001-04-12 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:26:01PM -0500, Dave Sherohman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:51:38PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:13:22AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: <...> > > You also have various options for opening menus. By defau

Re: WindowMaker Rocks!! ;-) (Was: FW: OT : GUI Interfaces)

2001-04-11 Thread Dave Sherohman
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 07:51:38PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote: > on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:13:22AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > You missed my favorite icewm (in 3 flavors - -gnome -lite). The most > > Windows-like wm (not counting KDE's). > > Legacy MS Windows is not necessarially

WindowMaker Rocks!! ;-) (Was: FW: OT : GUI Interfaces)

2001-04-11 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 08:13:22AM +0800, csj ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Thursday 12 April 2001 07:44, Karsten M. Self wrote: > > WindowMaker, my preference. Gratuitous screenshots at > > http://kmself.home.netcom.com/Images/Desktop/ It's running very > > happily on my PPro 180MHz/256MB sys