On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 02:34:54PM +0200, Ulf Volmer wrote:
> On 15.08.2018 14:02, Reco wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:33:37AM -0300, Marcelo Lacerda wrote:
>
> >> but I imagine that a
> >> security update to it doesn't actually change anything to libc source code,
> >> so why do the two of
On 15.08.2018 14:02, Reco wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:33:37AM -0300, Marcelo Lacerda wrote:
>> but I imagine that a
>> security update to it doesn't actually change anything to libc source code,
>> so why do the two of them always upgrade together?
>
> Today's stable kernel update brought
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 08:33:37AM -0300, Marcelo Lacerda wrote:
> I know that the kernel and libc are deeply integrated
On the contrary, libc merely states a minimal supported kernel version,
and you're free to use more-or-less recent kernel with it.
You'll miss all new system calls,
I know that the kernel and libc are deeply integrated but I imagine that a
security update to it doesn't actually change anything to libc source code,
so why do the two of them always upgrade together?
4 matches
Mail list logo