On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 06:06:41PM +0300, IL Ka wrote:
> Hi.
>
> OSes usually include all CA certificates (even expired). Windows also does
> it (I have CA expired in 1999 in win10).
>
> User should have the ability to distinguish between invalid signatures and
> old/expired signatures.
> While t
Hi.
OSes usually include all CA certificates (even expired). Windows also does
it (I have CA expired in 1999 in win10).
User should have the ability to distinguish between invalid signatures and
old/expired signatures.
While the latter is an expected situation, the former is definitely fraud.
Hi folks,
apparently /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/DST_Root_CA_X3.crt expired last
year:
% openssl x509 -in /usr/share/ca-certificates/mozilla/DST_Root_CA_X3.crt -noout
-dates
notBefore=Sep 30 21:12:19 2000 GMT
notAfter=Sep 30 14:01:15 2021 GMT
I wonder why it is still included in ca-cer
Dan Ritter writes:
> Laura Smith wrote:
>> On Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 at 18:28, Dan Ritter
>> wrote:
>>
>> > That was the subject line of a message I just received from a
>> > - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal [...]
>>
>> Unless you were a very bad covert agent, you would
Laura Smith wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 at 18:28, Dan Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > That was the subject line of a message I just received from a
> > - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal [...]
>
> Unless you were a very bad covert agent, you would say that, wouldn't you ;).
Co
On Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 at 18:28, Dan Ritter
wrote:
> That was the subject line of a message I just received from a
> - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal [...]
Unless you were a very bad covert agent, you would say that, wouldn't you ;).
That was the subject line of a message I just received from a
Debian-user member.
In case anyone is confused:
- I write my point of view because that's the one I have
- I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal, to the best of
my knowledge.
- I have no idea what 'trying to subvert someth
.d files are generated dependency files.
http://scottmcpeak.com/autodepend/autodepend.html
https://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Automatic-Prerequisites.html
Your Ninja build is probably not generating these, (config issue?).
Jeff
On 10/18/2016 11:58 AM, Jarle Aase wrote:
Just
On 10/18/2016 06:50 PM, Jarle Aase wrote:
> Hi fellow developers,
>
> After upgrading Debian Testing a few weeks ago, some of my pet
> projects could no longer build. They are all C++ projects, using
> CMake. I use Kdevelop as my IDE. I waited a while and upgraded again
> today, hoping that the pr
Just a few observations:
1) Both ninja and Unix Makefiles works if I use cmake on the command-line
2) Kdevelop successfully compiles the project if I use Unix Makefiles
for cmake in stead of Ninja.
So the problem seems related with Ninja. However, it would still be
interesting to understan
Hi fellow developers,
After upgrading Debian Testing a few weeks ago, some of my pet projects
could no longer build. They are all C++ projects, using CMake. I use
Kdevelop as my IDE. I waited a while and upgraded again today, hoping
that the problem would be gone. Unfortunately it was not.
F
On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 19:40 -0800, Patrick Bartek wrote:
> You evidently made a mistake (or several) during the installation.
>You need to discover what BEFORE taking that exam. Won't impress a
>future employer or client of your talents if you can't even install Red
>Hat.
>
> FWIW, I've never ex
--- On Thu, 12/8/11, Phil Dobbin wrote:
> ... I tried to install Fedora &
> ended up with half a boot partition,
> tried CentOS (I'm taking my RHCE exam soon) & the
> laptop ended up D.O.A.
You evidently made a mistake (or several) during the installation. You need to
discover what BEFORE taki
... I tried to install Fedora & ended up with half a boot partition,
tried CentOS (I'm taking my RHCE exam soon) & the laptop ended up D.O.A.
(wouldn't even boot from a rescue disk) so I tried Debian Squeeze which
I use on my desktop machine & the laptop is now sitting there quite
happily without a
Hello Greg.
Greg Folkert, 02.04.2007 00:32:
> […]
>
> And you all wonder why OT threads come about so easily.
YMMD!
Regards, Mathias
--
debian/rules
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 14:32 -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote:
> Why is /etc/blkid.tab in /etc?
>
> Its not static, but changes whenever I mount an USB stick.
>
> The policy FHS 2.3 (Etch) says that things in /etc must be static but
> that /etc/mtab is excepted for historical reasons.
>
> man blk
Why is /etc/blkid.tab in /etc?
Its not static, but changes whenever I mount an USB stick.
The policy FHS 2.3 (Etch) says that things in /etc must be static but
that /etc/mtab is excepted for historical reasons.
man blkid says that /etc/blkid.tab is a cachefile. Shouldn't it be in
/var/cache?
D
I've been looking at the pam configuration on some of my debian boxes.
I'm trying to set up pam_winbindd, but am going to have some issues with
stacking.
I saw that pam_env is enabled as an auth module, and saw this blurb in
its config file:
# The original idea for this came from Andrew G. Morgan
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Why is the native filesystem of Linux called "Extende filesystem " ?
Linux originally came with (a clone of ) the Minix filesystem.
Then some people developed the Extended File System. I'm not
sure who they were, but probably Remi Card a
Why is the native filesystem of Linux called "Extende filesystem " ?
Thanks,
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Shyam
"Quality can Never be Quantified . It exists by itself and Quantity might hand
it an
untimely demise if blown out of the very fragile proportions that constitute it
."
I'm getting a strange log entry in my system, that happens every 14
minutes past the hour. I checked my chrontab and chron.d to make sure
there's no unknown service running - but all I have is exim,
postgresql, and logcheck and the standard daily, weekly, monthly
scripts.
Here's what a sample line
"username:" to "username:--username:" in /etc/chat*/provider
> and it doesn't work. I recreate a connection and choose PAP and add login
> lines in /etc/chat*/provider and it fails again. Why is it so hard to
> connect to ISP in Debian 2.0?
>
> - Origi
n chat[214]: alarm
Nov 28 06:02:55 debian chat[214]: Failed
Nov 28 06:02:55 debian pppd[213]: Connect script failed
Later I change "username:" to "username:--username:" in /etc/chat*/provider
and it doesn't work. I recreate a connection and choose PAP and add login
lines in /et
23 matches
Mail list logo
