Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-17 Thread Steve Block
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:58:43PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: Am 2006-03-08 00:05:52, schrieb T: $ grep -1 backports /etc/apt/preferences Package: * Pin: release a=sarge-backports Pin-Priority: 200 Why not use: Package: * Pin: origin www.ba

Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-17 Thread Michelle Konzack
Am 2006-03-08 00:05:52, schrieb T: > $ grep -1 backports /etc/apt/preferences > Package: * > Pin: release a=sarge-backports > Pin-Priority: 200 Why not use: Package: * Pin: origin www.backports.org Pin-Priority: 200 Greetings Michelle Konzack

Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-08 Thread T
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 09:11:55 +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote: >> It will be automatically updated from sarge to backport. Why? > > It is upgraded because the installed version has a lower priority > (100<200). It has a lower priority because that version is not available > in any archive. Probably b

Re: Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-08 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello T (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I've been following the "Debian Backports - Instructions" > at http://www.backports.org/instructions.html > to use backports so as to _deactivate_ all packages from > backports.org by default. No. You don't decativate them, you pin them to a lower priority

Why backports packages not deactivated

2006-03-07 Thread T
I've been following the "Debian Backports - Instructions" at http://www.backports.org/instructions.html to use backports so as to _deactivate_ all packages from backports.org by default. However, I noticed that at least one package is automatically updated from sarge to backport. First of all, I