-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Glen Pfeiffer wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
>> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>>> Correct. And on the EU level they are even discussing to make
>>> a similar law obligatory for all member states.
>> The EU is not a body (yet) that can enforce laws. Therefore,
>> the
Joe Hart wrote:
> Jochen Schulz wrote:
>> Correct. And on the EU level they are even discussing to make
>> a similar law obligatory for all member states.
>
> The EU is not a body (yet) that can enforce laws. Therefore,
> they cannot mandate laws.
Correct me if I am wrong, please, but I believe J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Dave Ewart:
>> On Tuesday, 06.03.2007 at 10:48 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>>
>>> It it my understanding (which may be obsolete or even simply
>>> erroneous) that in Germany computer games are not to be made available
>>> to childr
Dave Ewart:
> On Tuesday, 06.03.2007 at 10:48 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>
>> It it my understanding (which may be obsolete or even simply
>> erroneous) that in Germany computer games are not to be made available
>> to children unless they have been approved and that the approval costs
>> money.
T
On Tuesday, 06.03.2007 at 10:48 -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> > _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for example, has a licensing law for
> > games (unless it has been repealed recently).
>
> Johannes writes:
> > Germany has a licensing law for free software games?
>
> It it my understanding (which may be
I wrote:
> _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for example, has a licensing law for games
> (unless it has been repealed recently).
Johannes writes:
> Germany has a licensing law for free software games?
It it my understanding (which may be obsolete or even simply erroneous)
that in Germany computer gam
John Hasler wrote:
>> (Aside: ``non-DE''? I thought the EU has so far staved off the
>> software-patent idiocy.)
>
> _Similar_ reasons. Germany, for example, has a licensing law for games
> (unless it has been repealed recently).
Germany has a licensing law for free software games? I never thou
I wrote:
> Then for similar reasons we'll need non-JP, non-DE, non-AU...
Max Hyre writes:
> Good point. Let me amend that to suggest the [non-patent] distribution.
> (Aside: ``non-DE''? I thought the EU has so far staved off the
> software-patent idiocy.)
_Similar_ reasons. Germany, for examp
John Hasler wrote:
> Max Hyre writes:
>> Given the status of software patents, though, it might be time to revive
>> [non-US].
>
> Then for similar reasons we'll need non-JP, non-DE, non-AU...
Good point. Let me amend that to suggest the [non-patent] distribution.
(Aside: ``non-DE''? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/07 18:28, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 13:58 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 03/03/07 13:47, Greg Folkert wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Gre
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 13:58 -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/03/07 13:47, Greg Folkert wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> >> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> >>> It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly th
ing changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
>>> Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
>> Yet another exaple of enforcing US law to the rest of the world!
>>
> What are you talking about? The law was a US law dealing with US
> citizens or residents
Andras Lorincz writes:
> Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
I wrote:
> Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
idsvp-helga writes:
> Yet another exaple of enforcing US law to the rest of the world!
ROFL.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 10:24:31PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:28:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> >
> > Andras Lorincz writes:
> > > Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
> >
> > Due to changes in US
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:28:15PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
>
> Andras Lorincz writes:
> > Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
>
> Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
Yet another exaple of enforcing US law to the rest of the world!
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:55:56PM -0500, Max Hyre wrote:
> John Hasler wrote:
>
> > Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
>
>The changes removed restrictions preventing citizens of the land of
> the free from sending strong crypto out of the country.
>
Actually, the spec
Max Hyre writes:
> Given the status of software patents, though, it might be time to revive
> [non-US].
Then for similar reasons we'll need non-JP, non-DE, non-AU...
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED
John Hasler wrote:
> Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
The changes removed restrictions preventing citizens of the land of
the free from sending strong crypto out of the country.
Given the status of software patents, though, it might be time to
revive it.
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/07 13:47, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>>> It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly the same
>>> time
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/07 13:28, John Hasler wrote:
> Andras Lorincz writes:
>> Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
>
> Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
Specifically, liberalizations made i
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 14:39 -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
> >
> > It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly the same
> > time Sarge became stable.
> >
> I don't think it was deprecated. I think it just went
Andras Lorincz writes:
> Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
Due to changes in US law it was eliminated some time ago.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 02:36:14PM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
> It has been deprecated since Woody became oldstable, or exactly the same
> time Sarge became stable.
>
I don't think it was deprecated. I think it just went away.
Regards,
-Roberto
--
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://people.connexer.
On Sat, 2007-03-03 at 21:02 +0200, Andras Lorincz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using testing and since a few days I get errors like
>
> /debian-non-US/dists/testing/non-US/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz: No
> such file or directory.
>
> Has something changed recently? Where i
Hi,
I'm using testing and since a few days I get errors like
/debian-non-US/dists/testing/non-US/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz: No
such file or directory.
Has something changed recently? Where is debian-non-US?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
25 matches
Mail list logo
