Jason Pepas wrote:
>
> get lame at forcer's page.
>
> http://www.forcix.cx/computer/debian.html
I tried that, but he doesn't have libmp3lame packaged, and that's what
I'm really looking for. After all, lame itself compiles easily on my
machine.
> by the way - Viktor - being supportive of open
On Tuesday 08 May 2001 02:28, Jason Pepas wrote:
> you wanted to, you simply cannot buy a portable CDR based Vorbis
> player - they dont exist.
not yet!
>Are there any hardware
> Vorbis players around?
Prototypes of the Iomega Hipzip with Vorbis support have been sighted.
ed to, you simply cannot buy a portable CDR based Vorbis
player - they dont exist.
jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
jason.pepas.com
- Original Message -
From: "Preben Randhol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Viktor Rosenfeld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Sunday, May
Robert Voigt wrote:
> > > Forget MP3, Ogg Vorbis is better as it is free :
> > >
> > >http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/index.html
> >
> > I know, but my custom-build hardware won't play it. Too bad.
>
> Custom hardware? Is that correct? Perhaps Vorbis should be portet to it ;)
Okay, I already
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:29:17PM +0200, Joost Kooij wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:22:33PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> > package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian
> > package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
> > already a maintainer? can this pa
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:22:33PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> package tree. i would like to adopt the lame mp3 encoder as a debian
> package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
> already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized?
Alas, you hit on a faq.
Please look at:
http:
On Monday 07 May 2001 21:21, Alan Shutko wrote:
> MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "Personal and commercial use of compiled versions of LAME (or any
> >other mp3 encoder) requires a patent license in
> >some countries."
>
> Has anyone compared it's ogg/vorbis output to oggenc? I'
MaD dUCK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Personal and commercial use of compiled versions of LAME (or any
>other mp3 encoder) requires a patent license in
>some countries."
Has anyone compared it's ogg/vorbis output to oggenc? I'd be
interested in what GPSYCHO can do for quality. It mi
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 10:52:29PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Mike Fedyk (on Sun, 06 May 2001 06:46:41PM -0700):
> > Is there a posibility of a source only distribution of certain packages?
>
> of course. check out qmail for instance.
> i guess to be fully honest, i *think* this is the r
On Monday 07 May 2001 04:52, MaD dUCK wrote:
> i guess to be fully honest, i *think* this is the reason that lame
> isn't part of the package system. why don't you become a maintainer?
It is available as a debian package, I downloaded it recently, but forgot the
URL. It was mentioned on some deb
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 07/05/2001 (12:03) :
> I know, but my custom-build hardware won't play it. Too bad.
Huh?
--
Preben Randhol --- http://www.pvv.org/~randhol/ --
«For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.»
Preben Randhol wrote:
>
> Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/05/2001 (11:34) :
> > Hi,
> >
> > how come, lame is nowhere in Debian? Not even in sid? Or libmp3lame
> > for that matter.
>
> Forget MP3, Ogg Vorbis is better as it is free :
>
>http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/index
also sprach Mike Fedyk (on Sun, 06 May 2001 06:46:41PM -0700):
> Is there a posibility of a source only distribution of certain packages?
of course. check out qmail for instance.
i guess to be fully honest, i *think* this is the reason that lame
isn't part of the package system. why don't you beco
On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 09:03:47PM -0400, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Viktor Rosenfeld (on Sun, 06 May 2001 02:47:15AM +0200):
> > how come, lame is nowhere in Debian? Not even in sid? Or libmp3lame
> > for that matter.
>
> from the lame webpage:
>
> "Personal and commercial use of compiled
Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 06/05/2001 (11:34) :
> Hi,
>
> how come, lame is nowhere in Debian? Not even in sid? Or libmp3lame
> for that matter.
Forget MP3, Ogg Vorbis is better as it is free :
http://www.xiph.org/ogg/vorbis/index.html
And there are packages in sid (perh
Forrest English wrote:
>
> check the unoffical apt sources page. there's one for lame there that i
> use.
Yeah, lame is packaged allright, but I'm really looking for libmp3lame.
I want to 'drag-n-drop' mp3 files directly from KDE's konqui, and it
requires that library.
Cheers
Viktor
--
Viktor
hi ya...
i think you can find lame here..
http://www.mp3dev.org/mp3 LAME
ftp://lame.sourceforge.net/pub/lame/src/
dont know about the other two
- probably a google search
c ya
alvin
http://www.Linux-Video.net
On Sun, 6 May 2001, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how come, lame is
On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 02:47:15AM +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> how come, lame is nowhere in Debian? Not even in sid? Or libmp3lame
> for that matter.
MP3 is patented and there for encoders aren't in Debian. You can build
it from source or use Ogg Vorbis which is not patented (and w
also sprach Viktor Rosenfeld (on Sun, 06 May 2001 02:47:15AM +0200):
> how come, lame is nowhere in Debian? Not even in sid? Or libmp3lame
> for that matter.
from the lame webpage:
"Personal and commercial use of compiled versions of LAME (or any
other mp3 encoder) requires a patent licens
check the unoffical apt sources page. there's one for lame there that i
use.
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"When we have nothing left to give
There will be no reason for us to live
But when we have nothing left to lose
You will have nothing left to use"
-Fugazi
On Sun, 6 May 2001,
Hi,
how come, lame is nowhere in Debian? Not even in sid? Or libmp3lame
for that matter.
Cheers,
Viktor
--
Viktor Rosenfeld
WWW: http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~rosenfel/
22 matches
Mail list logo
