David Jardine wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:14:51PM -0500, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
When freedom and tolerance seem to fail, repression always is an
answer. Sound familiar? Be afraid, children, be very afraid.
That last sentence certainly sounds pathetically familiar ;-)
Yes. I believe Master Yoda
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:14:51PM -0500, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
>
> When freedom and tolerance seem to fail, repression always is an
> answer. Sound familiar? Be afraid, children, be very afraid.
>
That last sentence certainly sounds pathetically familiar ;-)
--
David Jardine
"Running Debian G
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 01:14:51PM -0500, Eric d'Alibut wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:20:22 +0100, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So much easier to just ban abusing list members, after suitable warning.
>
> One could ask for no clearer demonstration of the animus that fuels the
>
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:20:22 +0100, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So much easier to just ban abusing list members, after suitable warning.
One could ask for no clearer demonstration of the animus that fuels the
fervor of the so-called "Open" and "Free" (source, software, whatever)
crow
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:19:46AM +0100, Joerg Rossdeutscher wrote:
> I wonder if one could implement a kind of "p2p-killfile". A group of
> people that trust another share a list of Msg-IDs. If one member kills a
> mail, it is killed for the others - possibly eben whole threads.
So much easier
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 29.12.2004, 14:35 -0500 schrieb Antonio Rodriguez:
> I think it would be wise to implement a way of stopping a thread at
> the top level when it goes to far off topic. It has been the case is
> several of them very recently.
I wonder if one could implement a kind of "p2p-kill
On Wed, 2004-12-29 at 15:26 -0500, Brendan wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 December 2004 14:35, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
[snip]
> You've got to be a socialist. ;-)
Hey, let's throw even *more* gas on the fire! Woo Hoo!
--
-
Ron Johnson, J
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 14:35, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> I think it would be wise to implement a way of stopping a thread at
> the top level when it goes to far off topic. It has been the case is
> several of them very recently. In the last DWN there are some
> references about it, with some
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 02:35:41PM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> I think it would be wise to implement a way of stopping a thread at
> the top level when it goes to far off topic. It has been the case is
> several of them very recently. In the last DWN there are some
> references about it, with
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 11:35 am, Antonio Rodriguez wrote:
> I think it would be wise to implement a way of stopping a thread at
> the top level when it goes to far off topic. It has been the case is
> several of them very recently. In the last DWN there are some
> references about it, with s
I think it would be wise to implement a way of stopping a thread at
the top level when it goes to far off topic. It has been the case is
several of them very recently. In the last DWN there are some
references about it, with some propositions about implementing a list
moderator I think. It is putti
11 matches
Mail list logo
