On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 01:12:00PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> I like the old kmail, which is what TDE gives me [...]
> There may be folks who can tie me for the minimum mouse clicks to handle
> their email [...]
That would be mutt users. Or Gnus. Or RMAIL ;-D
Cheers
-- t
signature.a
On Thursday 09 July 2020 08:51:51 to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:21:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > All that said, we won't hold the stone age against ya ;)
> >
> > Guilty re the stone age. What I have has been working well for
> > decades.
>
> I think that
On Jo, 09 iul 20, 08:01:43, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2020 04:38:14 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > Please post the output of 'apt policy fetchmail'.
>
> fetchmail:
> Installed: (none)
> Candidate: (none)
> Version table:
> 6.3.26-3 -1
> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 08:21:40AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
[...]
> > All that said, we won't hold the stone age against ya ;)
>
> Guilty re the stone age. What I have has been working well for decades.
I think that dismissive, sometimes condescending tone is not
warranted. Fetchmail is a fi
On Thursday 09 July 2020 05:47:15 Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:38:14AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Mi, 08 iul 20, 09:36:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > And I note that procmail is being bad-mouthed, but its been doing
> > > exactly what I want for 2 decades with no hic
On Thursday 09 July 2020 04:38:14 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 iul 20, 09:36:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 July 2020 07:54:33 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:12:20AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > As a 2 decade user of fetchmail/procmail combo, I just u
On Thursday 09 July 2020 04:14:14 Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 iul 20, 05:12:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Also, I've not a clue how to generate the systemd-service file that
> > systemd seems to be demanding and that so far I have had to rebuild
> > fetchmail from src and reinstall everytime c
On Thu, Jul 09, 2020 at 11:38:14AM +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 08 iul 20, 09:36:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > And I note that procmail is being bad-mouthed, but its been doing
> > exactly what I want for 2 decades with no hiccups.
>
> I remember having a look at its syntax and... well, le
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 09:36:25, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 July 2020 07:54:33 Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:12:20AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > As a 2 decade user of fetchmail/procmail combo, I just updated to
> > > stretch backports, but did not get a TLSv1.3,
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 05:12:20, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Also, I've not a clue how to generate the systemd-service file that
> systemd seems to be demanding and that so far I have had to rebuild
> fetchmail from src and reinstall everytime cron runs
> ~/bin/sa-train-bayes. Thats not very friendly o
On Wednesday 08 July 2020 07:54:33 Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:12:20AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > As a 2 decade user of fetchmail/procmail combo, I just updated to
> > stretch backports, but did not get a TLSv1.3, so when I configure
> > the newest fetchmail, I don't get
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:12:20AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> As a 2 decade user of fetchmail/procmail combo, I just updated to stretch
> backports, but did not get a TLSv1.3, so when I configure the newest
> fetchmail, I don't get ssl3 support.
Er... what? This question doesn't make any sens
Greetings all;
2 questions.
As a 2 decade user of fetchmail/procmail combo, I just updated to stretch
backports, but did not get a TLSv1.3, so when I configure the newest
fetchmail, I don't get ssl3 support.
So whats chances of getting that in stretch security/backports?
Also, I've not a clue
13 matches
Mail list logo
