Colin wrote:
Tom Allison wrote:
I guess I haven't been paying attention much lately. But where did the
kernel-image 2.6.12 go?
There is a linux-image 2.6.12 out there, but nothing to indicate that
this is a replacement to the kernel-image...
Ok, I will. linux-image-2.6.12 is the replacemen
On 2005-08-16 21:38:31 -0400, Rick Pasotto wrote:
> Both linux-image-k7 and linux-image-2.6-k7 currently depend on
> linux-image-2.6.12-2-k7 but only linux-image-2.6.12-1-k7 is available.
>
> Is that a bug that should be reported?
Perhaps. linux-image-2.6.12-2-k7 isn't listed on
http://package
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 06:48:40PM -0400, Rick Friedman wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 August 2005 06:15 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> > I guess I haven't been paying attention much lately. But where did the
> > kernel-image 2.6.12 go?
> >
> > There is a linux-image 2.6.12 out there, but nothing to indicate th
Tom Allison wrote:
> I guess I haven't been paying attention much lately. But where did the
> kernel-image 2.6.12 go?
>
> There is a linux-image 2.6.12 out there, but nothing to indicate that
> this is a replacement to the kernel-image...
Ok, I will. linux-image-2.6.12 is the replacement for ker
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 06:15 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> I guess I haven't been paying attention much lately. But where did the
> kernel-image 2.6.12 go?
>
> There is a linux-image 2.6.12 out there, but nothing to indicate that
> this is a replacement to the kernel-image...
>
> Which one do I use?
I guess I haven't been paying attention much lately. But where did the
kernel-image 2.6.12 go?
There is a linux-image 2.6.12 out there, but nothing to indicate that
this is a replacement to the kernel-image...
Which one do I use?
Any other goodies to watch out for?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
6 matches
Mail list logo