Re: What's the best way to organize "small" drives

1999-07-04 Thread John Foster
David Forcey wrote: > > NEWBIE ALERT! > > I just installed slink on a 486-100 (Windows throwaway) with 3 salvaged > drives (each 540 MB). I partitioned them as follows: > hda1bootPrimary Linux ext2250.4MB > hda2Primary Linux Swap63.99 MB > hda3Primary

Re: What's the best way to organize "small" drives

1999-07-03 Thread John Pearson
On Fri, Jul 02, 1999 at 12:29:59PM -0500, David Forcey wrote > NEWBIE ALERT! > > I just installed slink on a 486-100 (Windows throwaway) with 3 salvaged > drives (each 540 MB). I partitioned them as follows: > hda1 bootPrimary Linux ext2250.4MB > hda2 Primary Linux Swap6

Re: What's the best way to organize "small" drives

1999-07-02 Thread Brad
On Fri, 2 Jul 1999, Marc Mongeon wrote: > I believe you are given the opportunity to mount multiple partitions > during the installation process. At the very least, you should mount > / and /usr on two separate (largest) partitions. These are the > directories that fill up quickly. Some people

Re: What's the best way to organize "small" drives

1999-07-02 Thread Marc Mongeon
David: I believe you are given the opportunity to mount multiple partitions during the installation process. At the very least, you should mount / and /usr on two separate (largest) partitions. These are the directories that fill up quickly. Some people also choose to mount /home, /usr/local, a

What's the best way to organize "small" drives

1999-07-02 Thread David Forcey
NEWBIE ALERT! I just installed slink on a 486-100 (Windows throwaway) with 3 salvaged drives (each 540 MB). I partitioned them as follows: hda1bootPrimary Linux ext2250.4MB hda2Primary Linux Swap63.99 MB hda3Primary Linux 201.8 MB hdb1