Re: Well I'm back in business.

2007-05-09 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:28:27PM -0400, Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:17:47PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:39:20AM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote: > > > permissions. I am thinking of filing my 1st bug report ever for this, if >

Re: Well I'm back in business.

2007-05-08 Thread Douglas Allan Tutty
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 10:17:47PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:39:20AM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote: > > permissions. I am thinking of filing my 1st bug report ever for this, if > > there isn't one already. > > > > > Bastille has some "issues". I used

Re: Well I'm back in business.

2007-05-08 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 03:39:20AM +0200, pizzapie_linuxanchovies wrote: > > Well I'm back in business. I restored my dpkg permissions back to normal > with this: > sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.10.28_i386.deb > > Also, I figured out that the culprit that

Well I'm back in business.

2007-05-08 Thread pizzapie_linuxanchovies
Well I'm back in business. I restored my dpkg permissions back to normal with this: sudo dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/dpkg_1.10.28_i386.deb Also, I figured out that the culprit that removed others' execute permission on dpkg was indeed the bastille security package (at least t