On Sun, 17 Nov 2002 13:00:56 +0200, Michelle Konzack
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Am 17:44 2002-11-15 + hat Pigeon geschrieben:
>>
>>On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:05:11 +, Glyn Kennington
>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>couldn't run tar & gzip, I had to unpack it with WinZip on my Wind
Hello,
Am 17:44 2002-11-15 + hat Pigeon geschrieben:
>
>On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:05:11 +, Glyn Kennington
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>couldn't run tar & gzip, I had to unpack it with WinZip on my Windoze
^^
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 08:44:43PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:21:00 +, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >Unless you're using MD5 passwords, old Unix crypt() has been broken for
> >a long time. In any case it's probably not a good idea to spread
> >/etc/shadow aroun
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:26:11 +, Glyn Kennington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pigeon wrote:
>> >And the `not an octal number' error suggest broken permissions somewhere.
>> It does, doesn't it? That was Microsoft's fault for their LF/CR line
>> break standard. In order to get my Linux box to boo
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:21:00 +, Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:44:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:05:11 +, Glyn Kennington
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >Check that /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow match the descriptions in `man
>> >pa
Pigeon wrote:
> >And the `not an octal number' error suggest broken permissions somewhere.
> It does, doesn't it? That was Microsoft's fault for their LF/CR line
> break standard. In order to get my Linux box to boot again I had to
> manually copy in the files from
> dists/slink/main/disks-i386/2.1
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 05:44:56PM +, Pigeon wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:05:11 +, Glyn Kennington
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Check that /etc/passwd and /etc/shadow match the descriptions in `man
> >passwd` and `man shadow` respectively.
>
> Hey, thanks for that. It was /etc/shado
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 01:05:11 +, Glyn Kennington
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pigeon wrote:
>> If, however, I enter _no_ password, I get:
>> : command not found
>> ' is not an octal number from 000 to 777
>> : command not found
>> : command not found
>>
>> and a somewhat mangled prompt; then
>>
Pigeon wrote:
> If, however, I enter _no_ password, I get:
> : command not found
> ' is not an octal number from 000 to 777
> : command not found
> : command not found
>
> and a somewhat mangled prompt; then
> whoami
> root
>
> - so I've su'ed to root without entering a password. WHAT?
>
> Wonde
The story so far:
- Accidentally nuke shared libraries; system dies
- Unpack base2_1.tgz off original Debian 2.1 install CD; manually copy
in enough of this and the rescue disk to get it to boot again
- dpkg -i everything in dists/stable/main/binary-i386/base
- Fire up dselect and reinstall everyth
10 matches
Mail list logo