Hello,
> # systemctl status apache2
> # apachectl configtest
> # journalctl -u apache2
I have solved it, and the reason for apache2 not starting with systemd
was that apache2 waited for nslcd to start, while nslcd waited for
time-sync.target and that waited for systemd-time-wait-sync.service.
Unf
On 4/19/25 18:11, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:42 AM Christoph Pleger <
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
after upgrading a computer from Debian 11 to Debian 12, I am unable to
start apache2 by systemd. Even configuring the apache2 package hangs
forever, if I
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 8:42 AM Christoph Pleger <
christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> after upgrading a computer from Debian 11 to Debian 12, I am unable to
> start apache2 by systemd. Even configuring the apache2 package hangs
> forever, if I do not kill the related processes
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 5:09 AM Joe wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 10:03:58 +0200
> Christoph Pleger wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > after upgrading a computer from Debian 11 to Debian 12, I am unable to
> > start apache2 by systemd. Even configuring the apache2 package hangs
> > forever, if I do not
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 19, 2025 at 10:03:58AM +0200, Christoph Pleger wrote:
> after upgrading a computer from Debian 11 to Debian 12, I am unable to
> start apache2 by systemd.
Always check:
# systemctl status apache2
# apachectl configtest
# journalctl -u apache2
and the contents of apache2's own er
Hello,
after upgrading a computer from Debian 11 to Debian 12, I am unable to
start apache2 by systemd. Even configuring the apache2 package hangs
forever, if I do not kill the related processes and edit
/var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2.postinst, commenting out all lines where
apache2 is tried to be sta
Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
>> - Do you have access to reverse DNS
> There is no reverse DNS set. Actually I have no experience with reverse
> DNS. How it is set if there is many web virtual hosts on same machine.
>> - How much you pay per month
> I pay about $30 a year for mail hosting. $15 monthly fo
On 2018-12-13 22:13, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
W dniu 13.12.2018, czw o godzinie 20∶55 +, użytkownik André Rodier
napisał:
On 2018-12-13 17:31, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> I'm just about having static IP for my LTE connection.
>
> That brings me to some idea. What about having install Debian on
>
W dniu 13.12.2018, czw o godzinie 20∶55 +, użytkownik André Rodier
napisał:
> On 2018-12-13 17:31, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> > I'm just about having static IP for my LTE connection.
> >
> > That brings me to some idea. What about having install Debian on
> > ARM
> > old phone to have it as web
arne wrote:
> I am sorry, it is called raspbian, not debian, for a reason.
I don't know about you, but I have native debian running on Raspberry. The
trick is to make it boot properly - and there are docs therefor.
I ended up putting the boot loader and firmware on an old 215MB SD card and
doin
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:45:26 +0100
deloptes wrote:
> it runs debian just fine
I am sorry, it is called raspbian, not debian, for a reason.
Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> In fact there is no need for GUI software as it will bloat RAM. SSH
> access is enough. Ok you can have fancy GUI for traffic analytics and
> system status monitoring just on your "server".
Come on, you again with brilliant ideas :)
I can not give you a few lines introduc
W dniu 13.12.2018, czw o godzinie 19∶28 +0100, użytkownik arne napisał:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:31:16 +0100
> Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
>
> > I'm just about having static IP for my LTE connection.
> >
> > That brings me to some idea. What about having install Debian on
> > ARM
> > old phone to hav
On Thu, 13 Dec 2018 18:31:16 +0100
Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> I'm just about having static IP for my LTE connection.
>
> That brings me to some idea. What about having install Debian on ARM
> old phone to have it as web server. They have quite modern hardware
> and this is of course depending on w
I'm just about having static IP for my LTE connection.
That brings me to some idea. What about having install Debian on ARM
old phone to have it as web server. They have quite modern hardware and
this is of course depending on web application, but I suspect that
ordinary PHP website could be serve
On Sb, 27 sep 14, 16:06:25, Ron Leach wrote:
>
> And thanks, of course, to everyone who - very strongly, for good reasons -
> recommended ftp and SSH but my co-workers really are locked down to email,
> http, and https, and their IT systems are configured to bar installing of
> arbitrary software.
On Sb, 27 sep 14, 09:03:22, Joel Rees wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether you can get a graphical client for ssh file
> access for MSWindows boxes, but it's worth a look.
There's at least WinSCP and FileZilla.
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
http://wiki.debian.org/FAQsFromDebianUser
Offtopic discussions am
On Sb, 27 sep 14, 00:12:09, Scott Ferguson wrote:
>
> I suspect from the OP's original post that a wiki 'might' be better
> suited to the job - it'll provide the upload ability, allow the use of
> ACLs, and provide simple communication and versioning ability in the
> same package. I'd recommend do
2014/09/28 0:06 "Ron Leach" :
>
> On 27/09/2014 15:35, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>
>> Joel Rees wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ron Leach wrote:
>>>>
>>>> List, good afternoon,
>>>>
>>>>
On 27/09/2014 15:35, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Joel Rees wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ron Leach wrote:
List, good afternoon,
What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that
would
enable co-workers to upload files to us?
Oh. Well, look at webdav. This is something
Joel Rees wrote:
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ron Leach wrote:
List, good afternoon,
What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that would
enable co-workers to upload files to us?
Oh. Well, look at webdav. This is something regularly done with webdav.
But I really
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Ron Leach wrote:
> List, good afternoon,
>
> What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that would
> enable co-workers to upload files to us?
>
> We exchange files with people we work with through email and attachments -
>
?q=hfs+exploit
>
> http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/
>
Perhaps monkey? Not the smallest web server, but still very small and
simple (and secure) all the same. Not in the stable or later repositories.
http://monkey-project.com/
mini-httpd is another small, fast, simple and secure webserver
On 09/26/2014 03:24 PM, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> It sounds to me like a good use case for retroshare or owncloud.
> The last one is available in debian as package and has a good community
> as far as i know.
Yes, those do the job. But if only some simple file sharing is needed,
both are *overkil
On 09/24/2014 03:53 PM, Ron Leach wrote:
List, good afternoon,
What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that
would enable co-workers to upload files to us?
We exchange files with people we work with through email and
attachments - that normally works well. During a
Well Lighttpd is pretty easy to use : http://www.lighttpd.net/
2014-09-26 12:47 GMT+02:00 softwatt :
> Checkout HFS + Wine.
> http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/
>
>
Checkout HFS + Wine.
http://www.rejetto.com/hfs/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 24 Sep 2014, Ron Leach wrote:
> List, good afternoon,
>
> What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that
> would enable co-workers to upload files to us?
>
> [snip]
I contract with several companies where I need to upload (and download)
multiple
Ron Leach wrote at 2014-09-24 08:53 -0500:
> What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that would
> enable co-workers to upload files to us?
Though they do not meet all your requirements, you might want to be
aware of woof and servefile.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 24/09/14 14:53, Ron Leach wrote:
What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that would
enable co-workers to upload files to us?
For just the file-upload bit, FTP is probably your best option. You
could set up a space for each of the users who need to upload files, and
Ron Leach:
>
> What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that
> would enable co-workers to upload files to us?
F*EX was recommended to me once:
http://fex.rus.uni-stuttgart.de/
Don't have any experience with it, though.
J.
--
I count my partner'
List, good afternoon,
What package would list members suggest for a small webserver that
would enable co-workers to upload files to us?
We exchange files with people we work with through email and
attachments - that normally works well. During a recent weekend, a
co-worker's email se
Hello,
I have a very busy webserver running apache2
checking /proc/net/ip_conntrack and filtering port 53 i noticed that i have
around 50 000 dns query in under 200 second.
destinations are by order:- memcache cluster- database- external web services
I can't add these in my /etc/hosts fi
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 09:29:23AM +0100, basti wrote:
> SRV1 -> Node 1
> client -->|(shared IP) \/
> | /\
> SRV2 -> Node 2
> :
> Node n
>
> Can
Denis thanks for your "nutshell explanation"
I will try the following:
SRV1 -> Node 1
client -->|(shared IP) \/
| /\
SRV2 -> Node 2
:
Node n
SRV
Le 27/03/2014 18:21, Denis Witt a écrit :
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:47:15 +0100
basti wrote:
perhaps that's a bit off topic here but can someone explain what I
need to build a hardware failover nginx cluster?
I a nutshell:
* (at least) two Servers
* a monitoring software
* a shared IP
On Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:47:15 +0100
basti wrote:
> perhaps that's a bit off topic here but can someone explain what I
> need to build a hardware failover nginx cluster?
I a nutshell:
* (at least) two Servers
* a monitoring software
* a shared IP
* something that will switch the shared IP
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 04:47:15PM +0100, basti wrote:
> Hello,
> perhaps that's a bit off topic here but can someone explain what I need
> to build a hardware failover nginx cluster?
>
> The unclear is:
> How does the client know that the server 1 is down and use the other one?
> DNS failover has
Hi,
> perhaps that's a bit off topic here but can someone explain what I need to
> build a hardware failover nginx cluster?
Nope, but define hardware. A loadbalancer does not care what OS you are
running, it does care what service it needs to balance. So, would "a debian
server running loadbala
Hello,
perhaps that's a bit off topic here but can someone explain what I need
to build a hardware failover nginx cluster?
The unclear is:
How does the client know that the server 1 is down and use the other one?
DNS failover has a delay because of the design I think.
client ---> SRV1
|--->
x27;ll have a look at that as well. At first sight it seems to be
> > implemented in Java and comes with its own webserver built-in
> > (probably
> > embedded tomcat).
[...]
Since I solved my 'problem', I thought I'd leave a short message about
it. Maybe others wi
That would depend on the usage, consider this:
- find an old jukebox
- strip the old (defective?) hardware
- insert cheap modern computer hardware
- include touchscreen for song selection
I'm seriously considering something like that. The web interface
would
be ideal for parties were people can
On Thu, 2012-12-27 at 21:48 +0100, berenger.mo...@neutralite.org wrote:
[...]
> > I had a look at this yesterday, you can combine the mpd package with
> > the
> > fookebox package, that last one is a web interface for mpd.
>
> Sounds interesting, maybe I'll try to take some time to test it,
> be
r
me, for few softwares you'll want recent versions, and it happens that
softwares maintain their own repo (like codeblocks and opera) and their
general ease of use is a part of the reasons why I like Debian. Being
free to easily use any up-to-date software I need recent is exactly what
I need
fit the bill very nicely. Debian/Ubuntu package is available
from the website, but not the Debian repositories.
I'll have a look at that as well. At first sight it seems to be
implemented in Java and comes with its own webserver built-in (probably
embedded tomcat).
Again, thanks for letting me meet mpd.
Regards,
Steven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
chine
without the need to install anything.
That is why obsidianmusic fits that job very well, only things needed
are:
1) the audio files (which I upload using scp)
2) a webserver (I use Apache)
3) php
4) mysql
Additionally there needs to be a single Amarok instance somewhere to
update the library,
administer a couple
of headless Linux servers as part of my job.
> You could
> write some scripts usable with ssh. Not very user friendly...
Exactly, and the point is that anyone (that I allow) should be able to
access the music library and play songs from it on their own machine
without the ne
Thanks for your suggestion, I'm not sure mpd does what I'm looking
for
but it seems great for use in another project (some jukebox thing I'm
wanting to have a go at). I will look further into it.
Yes, it's great for jukeboxes, but not only :)
And you know what? I'll try to show you that I'm rig
> Maybe a content management system instead of a basic web server?
> Drupal perhaps?
Very nice
I looked at drupal and see two cool things:
1. It is packaged for Debian
2. There is a Drupal based CMS designed for academics purpose:
OpenScholar [0]
If I had known I could was package OpenScho
tion, not both) to your music.
This actually creates a .m3u file (playlist) you can download and run in
your average media player. The music is actually served through the
webserver (in case of download the server generates a .tar.gz file).
This allows you to have different clients, listening to different
Le 25.12.2012 14:36, Steven Post a écrit :
Hi,
Could anyone recommend a viable alternative to obsidianmusic?
It appears to be unmaintained and has some issues where not all music
is
accessible.
What is obsidianmusic? It is a web interface to your amarok music
library (when using mysql as th
Hi,
Could anyone recommend a viable alternative to obsidianmusic?
It appears to be unmaintained and has some issues where not all music is
accessible.
What is obsidianmusic? It is a web interface to your amarok music
library (when using mysql as the DB back-end), so that music can be
streamed ove
Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
Lars Noodén gmail.com> writes:
You can specify which directory the web server looks for, such as
~/public/www, if the default ~/public_html is not to your liking.
OK!
But, what do you suggest to facilitate my colleagues windows users to
administrates their sites?
On 12/23/2012 04:51 PM, Marcelo Luiz de Laia wrote:
> Lars Noodén gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> You can specify which directory the web server looks for, such as
>> ~/public/www, if the default ~/public_html is not to your liking.
>
>
> OK!
>
> But, what do you suggest to facilitate my colleagues wi
Lars Noodén gmail.com> writes:
>
> You can specify which directory the web server looks for, such as
> ~/public/www, if the default ~/public_html is not to your liking.
OK!
But, what do you suggest to facilitate my colleagues windows users to
administrates their sites? They don't have familiar
On 12/23/2012 02:52 PM, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> I want to setup some thing like this:
> http://ourdepartment.ouruniversity.edu.br/~colleague1 and so on for
> all others ones.
That would be mod_userdir
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/howto/public_html.html
You can specify which directory the web s
Hi,
I would like to set up a webserver to our department at our
University.
I already have been installed Debian stable and select "web sever"
when it asked me. So, no graphic desktop. Only Command Line and LAMP.
This server will provide our subdomain
(http://ourdepartment.ourunivers
Thanks for the tips michael. wound up backing up wp directory and
databases again to be safe. then I found something else that helped
just in case anyone else runs into the same issue. by deleting the
value in the wp_options > active_plugins table I was able to access the
site again. looks
Good morning
had a few updates to install on my squeeze webserver yesterday and am
now having a problem with a self hosted wordpress site for my small
business. specifically encountering an http 500, internal error. Have
had it running on this poweredge since squeeze came out, and have made
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 10:14:07 +0530, Joby Mathew wrote:
No html, please, thanks.
> Apache or Nginx
There's no "better or worse" (those are empty words that rest at the
marketing departments) but different implementations to do one thing for
different usages/scenarios, meaning "best" is whicheve
Celejar wrote:
Please do not use HTML.
It depends on user. I have always used Apache, but some people say that
Nginx is better. I don't have any usage experience with it. I also know
one person who says that he is using combination of them both, but I am
not sure how it happens.
And check out l
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 11:01:05 +0300
Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 20.04.2012 07:44, Joby Mathew kirjoitti:
> >
> > Apache or Nginx
> >
>
> Please do not use HTML.
>
> It depends on user. I have always used Apache, but some people say that
> Nginx is better. I don't have any usage experience wi
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:14:07AM +0530, Joby Mathew wrote:
> Apache or Nginx
You need to define your evaluation criteria.
Personally I use lighttpd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 10:14:07AM +0530, Joby Mathew wrote:
> Apache or Nginx
There's only one way to find out.
FIGHT!!![1]
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Np6gyUb0E7o
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
20.04.2012 07:44, Joby Mathew kirjoitti:
>
> Apache or Nginx
>
Please do not use HTML.
It depends on user. I have always used Apache, but some people say that
Nginx is better. I don't have any usage experience with it. I also know
one person who says that he is using combination of them bot
On 20/04/12 14:44, Joby Mathew wrote:
>
> Apache or Nginx
>
Yes.
Or Apache, Monkey, or Nginx is best.
Depending on your needs.
Kind regards
--
Iceweasel/Firefox/Chrome/Chromium/Iceape/IE extensions for finding
answers to questions about Debian:-
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo
Apache or Nginx
Hi, Roger:
On Friday 18 September 2009 14:48:32 RogerV wrote:
> Is there anything "different" needed to configure Tomcat to work behind
> Apache webserver under Debian
Not that I'm aware off.
> as opposed to say OpenSuse or Windows. I've
> been fighting this a
Is there anything "different" needed to configure Tomcat to work behind
Apache webserver under Debian, as opposed to say OpenSuse or Windows. I've
been fighting this all day and Apache flatly refuses to forward URL's to
tomcat and instead look for all urls at /var/www. All
Hey All,
I enabled the ssl module for apache2, created a key by "openssl genrsa
-des3 -out server.key 1024" and use "openssl req -new -key server.key -
out server.csr" to created a CSR. Afterwards created a self signed
certificate by "openssl x509 -req -days 365 -in server.csr -signkey
server.key
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:35:09 -0600
Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:22:21 -0600
> > Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [1] Is there a switch I'm not aware of that causes a search for
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 09:35:09 -0600
Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:22:21 -0600
> > Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > [1] Is there a switch I'm not aware of that causes a search for
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 05:43:30PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:22:21 -0600
> Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [1] Is there a switch I'm not aware of that causes a search for, say,
> > php to return just the actual php packages (i.e., php3 and php4)
> > instea
Fabian (Lists) wrote:
Niels Rasmussen wrote:
SL Lists wrote:
I used Apachefriends' XAMPP on both Windows and Linux. Have a look at
http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html
Hi again,
I have two problems right now:
1. in my terminal this comes up repeatedly:
libgcc_s.so.1 must be instal
as the
perfect setup before uploading it, thats all.
I dont have all the knowledge in setting up a webserver from scratch and
this one works very well for me :-)
That is understandable. It may be worth it to try setting one up sometime.
If just for the practice.
I am also surpised that XAMPP pro
Niels Rasmussen wrote:
SL Lists wrote:
I used Apachefriends' XAMPP on both Windows and Linux. Have a look at
http://www.apachefriends.org/en/xampp.html
Hi again,
I have two problems right now:
1. in my terminal this comes up repeatedly:
libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for pthread_cancel
ng up a webserver from scratch and this
one works very well for me :-)
--
/Niels
Registred Linux user #133791
Get counted at http://counter.li.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
want to install a fullblown webserver just to check if
> my pages looks all right, before uploading.
I'm not sure if this has been made clear to you, but by running
WAMP you were in fact running a full-blown webserver.
Apache (the "A" in WAMP and LAMP) is a webserver, and a go
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:22:21 -0600
Dave Sherohman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [1] Is there a switch I'm not aware of that causes a search for, say,
> php to return just the actual php packages (i.e., php3 and php4)
> instead of all the hundreds of phpgroupware-* and other packages that
> use php
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Niels Rasmussen wrote:
> Does such a utility exist for use with debian (or something similar) ?
>
> I've read about LAMP but cant find it in the repositories :-/
Well, you're already running Linux, so that's covered.
$ apt-cache search apache
apache - v
Niels Rasmussen wrote:
Hi list
In Windows there is a utility called WAMP, which stands for:
Windows+Apache+MySQL+PHP
It was quite nice to use for testing PHP-apps locally before uploading
to my domain.
I dont want to install a fullblown webserver just to check if my pages
looks all
my domain.
>
> I dont want to install a fullblown webserver just to check if my
> pages looks all right, before uploading.
>
>
> Does such a utility exist for use with debian (or something
> similar) ?
>
> I've read about LAMP but cant find it in the repositorie
Hi list
In Windows there is a utility called WAMP, which stands for:
Windows+Apache+MySQL+PHP
It was quite nice to use for testing PHP-apps locally before uploading to my
domain.
I dont want to install a fullblown webserver just to check if my pages looks
all right, before uploading
On 23.01.07 13:49, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> I have a webserver, using apache2. I've got gnome-power-manager running
> too. I'm wondering if suspend via gnome-power-manager affects a website
> being served. Or, does hibernate via gnome-power-manager affects a
> website be
On Tue, Jan 23, 2007 at 01:49:17PM -0500, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> I have a webserver, using apache2. I've got gnome-power-manager running too.
> I'm wondering if suspend via gnome-power-manager affects a website being
> served. Or, does hibernate via gnome-power-manage
I have a webserver, using apache2. I've got gnome-power-manager running too.
I'm wondering if suspend via gnome-power-manager affects a website being
served. Or, does hibernate via gnome-power-manager affects a website being
served? I'm using Etch.
Mark
--
To UNSUBS
Andreas Rippl wrote:
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 07:19:51AM -0500, Jesus Arocho wrote:
Yesterday I set up an account with dyndns. And here is perhaps a dumb
question. I tried to view my webpage on the Apache server and nothing,
should I see something or must I try to access from outside my ow
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 07:19:51AM -0500, Jesus Arocho wrote:
> Yesterday I set up an account with dyndns. And here is perhaps a dumb
> question. I tried to view my webpage on the Apache server and nothing,
> should I see something or must I try to access from outside my own network?
>
Hi Jesu
Yesterday I set up an account with dyndns. And here is perhaps a dumb
question. I tried to view my webpage on the Apache server and nothing,
should I see something or must I try to access from outside my own network?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
Hello. I have a webserver using apache 1.3.33, with Debian Sarge. I
use webmin to set it up. Recently, there have been some problems with
recognition of files due to the case of the charachers -- link to
filenames that had previously had uppercase charachers were not
recognized, because the
tutorial or a success story about this kind of task?
>
> I have a webserver already running with two identical discs but currently
> setup without any redundancy (just simple backup).
> Can I prepare the second IDE disc on the fly to be part of a mirror set
> (raid 1)?
> The
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
>Hello,
>
>
Hi,
>Has anybody a tutorial or a success story about this kind of task?
>
>
I made it many time (not remotely, but it make no difference), it was
the only solution before software raid was supported in debian (before
sarge)
>I hav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anybody a tutorial or a success story about this kind of task?
>
> I have a webserver already running with two identical discs but currently
> setup without any redundancy (just simple backup).
> Can I prepare the second IDE disc on
Hello,
Has anybody a tutorial or a success story about this kind of task?
I have a webserver already running with two identical discs but currently
setup without any redundancy (just simple backup).
Can I prepare the second IDE disc on the fly to be part of a mirror set
(raid 1)?
The filesystem
Gabe Granger wrote:
> I've tried twice before... it always produced a html output but very
> contained any data... I will give it another go and see if i can get
> the damn thing to work... one of the things that always put me of was
> the huge config file
>
I have awstats setup for my serv
gt; On Monday 10 October 2005 15:57, Gabe Granger wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone have any good suggestions about good webserver logfile
> >> analisers. Specfically when it comes to website written in php?
> >>
> >> I'm currently using webdruid and webalizer but
On 10/10/05, Gabe Granger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've never managed to get awstats working:(
>
> as for information
>
> I'd like a little bit more information then
>
> /aus/product.php
>
> There are over 200 products, and do not know what people are looking
>
[snip]
Then you will have beauti
0 Oct 2005, at 16:12, Graham Smith wrote:
On Monday 10 October 2005 15:57, Gabe Granger wrote:
Does anyone have any good suggestions about good webserver logfile
analisers. Specfically when it comes to website written in php?
I'm currently using webdruid and webalizer but these can not r
On Monday 10 October 2005 15:57, Gabe Granger wrote:
> Does anyone have any good suggestions about good webserver logfile
> analisers. Specfically when it comes to website written in php?
>
> I'm currently using webdruid and webalizer but these can not report
> back anythin
Gabe Granger wrote:
Does anyone have any good suggestions about good webserver logfile
analisers. Specfically when it comes to website written in php?
I'm currently using webdruid and webalizer but these can not report
back anything more then the fact the file.php has been acc
1 - 100 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
