Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

2003-12-19 Thread Lucas Albers
Alvin Oga said: >> I was hoping reiser could give me better redundancy. > > supposed to be better > - i assume yoy dont mean "redundancy" but that you dont > want to wait around for fsck checks of the fs after > accidental or silly or testing power off > > xfs or jfs supposed to

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

2003-12-19 Thread Alvin Oga
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > > Alvin Oga said: > > reiserfs-3.6 w/ linux-2.4.23 seems to work fine ( normally ) now for > > / and lilo and everything else ( using it daily ) > > prior versions/combinations i tried failed miserably > Have you notices any corruption using reise

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

2003-12-19 Thread Alvin Oga
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Lucas Albers wrote: > Mentions that you should not use reiserfs as your boot partition? > Can you extrapolate, I've used reiserfs as my boot partiton with no > problems, and would be interested in what you have encountered: > > "The only significant consideration here was t

Re: Web server Partitions - reiserfs

2003-12-19 Thread Lucas Albers
Alvin Oga said: > reiserfs-3.6 w/ linux-2.4.23 seems to work fine ( normally ) now for > / and lilo and everything else ( using it daily ) > prior versions/combinations i tried failed miserably Have you notices any corruption using reiserfs, does it sync a lot faster on reboots compared to