On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 07:35:06AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 05:56:32PM -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > On Sat June 21 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > > is 2.6.25 in Sid ?
> > >
> > > Yep!
> > >
> > > $ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> > > linux-image-2.6.2
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 05:56:32PM -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Sat June 21 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > is 2.6.25 in Sid ?
> >
> >
> > Yep!
> >
> > $ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> > linux-image-2.6.25-2-686:
> > Installed: 2.6.25-5
> > Candidate: 2.6.25-5
> > Versi
On Sat June 21 2008, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > is 2.6.25 in Sid ?
>
>
> Yep!
>
> $ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
> linux-image-2.6.25-2-686:
> Installed: 2.6.25-5
> Candidate: 2.6.25-5
> Version table:
> *** 2.6.25-5 0
> 500 ftp://ftp.ro.debian.org unstable/main Package
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 03:11:11PM -0400, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I'm on Lenny, with:
> # uname -a
> Linux paulandcilla 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP
>
> is 2.6.25 in Sid ?
Yep!
$ apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.25-2-686
linux-image-2.6.25-2-686:
Installed: 2.6.25-5
Candidate: 2.6.25-5
Version
On Sat June 21 2008, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > When are you going to 2.6.25?
>
> Not really certain. Is there a pressing need?
I'm on Lenny, with:
# uname -a
Linux paulandcilla 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP
is 2.6.25 in Sid ?
--
Paul Cartwright
Registered Linux user # 367800
Registered Ubuntu User #12459
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/08 12:30, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>>
>> On 06/21/08 07:35, Frank McCormick wrote:
>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:51:09 +0200
>>> Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On 2008-06-21 03:54 +0200, Frank McCormick wrote:
Ron Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/08 07:35, Frank McCormick wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:51:09 +0200
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008-06-21 03:54 +0200, Frank McCormick wrote:
I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/21/08 07:35, Frank McCormick wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:51:09 +0200
> Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On 2008-06-21 03:54 +0200, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>>> I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 21 Jun 2008 12:51:09 +0200
Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008-06-21 03:54 +0200, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
> > I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs
> > updating - please use bus type methods mean ???
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 21:06:12 -0500
Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs
> > updating - please use bus type methods mean ???
>
> What does Google say?
>
Mostly just a lot o
On 2008-06-21 03:54 +0200, Frank McCormick wrote:
> I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs updating -
> please use
> bus type methods mean ???
It seems to be harmless, see the thread starting at
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/10/47. The message is still present in
Linux 2.
Frank McCormick:
>
> I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs updating -
> please use
> bus type methods mean ???
I think that's the kernel telling you that the driver you are using for
device sda needs an update (to use a new API or something to that
effect).
I would eit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/08 20:54, Frank McCormick wrote:
>
>
> I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs updating -
> please use
> bus type methods mean ???
What does Google say?
>
> Jun 20 21:44:38 debian kernel: [9.917343] hda: cache
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I noticed this is my syslog today---what does driver 'sd' needs updating -
please use
bus type methods mean ???
Jun 20 21:44:38 debian kernel: [9.917343] hda: cache flushes not supported
Jun 20 21:44:38 debian kernel: [9.919560] hda: cach
14 matches
Mail list logo