Re: spam on list this (was: Re: Walter Overeager)

2011-09-23 Thread Walter Hurry
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 00:26:17 +0200, Martin Steigerwald wrote: > Am Freitag, 23. September 2011 schrieb Walter Hurry: >> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:29:38 +0100, Terence wrote: >> > On 23 September 2011 18:13, Tony van der Hoff >> > >> > wrote: >> >> On 23/09/11 18:54, Walter Hurry wrote: >> >>> And b

spam on list this (was: Re: Walter Overeager)

2011-09-23 Thread Martin Steigerwald
Am Freitag, 23. September 2011 schrieb Walter Hurry: > On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:29:38 +0100, Terence wrote: > > On 23 September 2011 18:13, Tony van der Hoff > > > > wrote: > >> On 23/09/11 18:54, Walter Hurry wrote: > >>> And by the way, I am not impressed with the SpamAssassin setup at > >>> lisz

Re: Walter Overeager

2011-09-23 Thread Walter Hurry
On Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:29:38 +0100, Terence wrote: > On 23 September 2011 18:13, Tony van der Hoff > wrote: >> On 23/09/11 18:54, Walter Hurry wrote: >>> >>> And by the way, I am not impressed with the SpamAssassin setup at >>> liszt.debian.org >> >> I am. Apart from the fact that it lets through

Re: Walter Overeager

2011-09-23 Thread Terence
On 23 September 2011 18:13, Tony van der Hoff wrote: > On 23/09/11 18:54, Walter Hurry wrote: >> >> And by the way, I am not impressed with the SpamAssassin setup at >> liszt.debian.org > > I am. Apart from the fact that it lets through HTML formatted emails (i.e. > sent by fuckwits), it lets thro

Walter Overeager

2011-09-23 Thread Tony van der Hoff
On 23/09/11 18:54, Walter Hurry wrote: And by the way, I am not impressed with the SpamAssassin setup at liszt.debian.org I am. Apart from the fact that it lets through HTML formatted emails (i.e. sent by fuckwits), it lets through very little spam. -- Tony van der Hoff | mailto:t...@vanderh