David Baron wrote:
Actually WYSIWYG is VERY BAD for web page creation. People can resize their
windows etc - and then what? All your WYSIWYG has gone to waste. In
addition your WYSIWYG is probably not even rendering the same as your
favorite browsers.
As annoying as it may be at the start, the
On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 20:17:45 +0200
"Manon Metten" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 8/28/07, Loeghmon T. Nejad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for creating
> > simple web pages, w
Mark Grieveson wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:13:12 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for
creating simple web pages, with mostly text, some graphics and pdf,
for debian Lenny please? Thanks.
--
Regards,
Iceape Composer
Hi,
On 8/28/07, Loeghmon T. Nejad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for creating
> simple web pages, with mostly text, some graphics and pdf, for debian Lenny
> please? Thanks.
You could use Quanta +. Pressing 2 will load the p
On 28 Aug 2007, KS wrote:
> pinniped wrote:
> >
> > Keep in mind that unless you use "style sheets" (in which
> > case you're trying to force a certain look on your visitors), HTML was
>
>
> No one is _forcing_ a certain look to the users by using a CSS. The user
> is free to use their own CSS i
> Actually WYSIWYG is VERY BAD for web page creation. People can resize their
> windows etc - and then what? All your WYSIWYG has gone to waste. In
> addition your WYSIWYG is probably not even rendering the same as your
> favorite browsers.
>
> As annoying as it may be at the start, the best way i
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 21:13:12 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for
> > creating simple web pages, with mostly text, some graphics and pdf,
> > for debian Lenny please? Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Re
pinniped wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that unless you use "style sheets" (in which
> case you're trying to force a certain look on your visitors), HTML was
No one is _forcing_ a certain look to the users by using a CSS. The user
is free to use their own CSS if they wish or even no CSS at all e.g. in
On 8/29/07, pinniped <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor
> >for creating simple web pages, with mostly text, some
> >graphics and pdf, for debian Lenny please? Thanks.
I use OpenOffice but I then touch the html manu
emacs or xemacs and html-helper-mode-el.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor
for creating simple web pages, with mostly text, some
graphics and pdf, for debian Lenny please? Thanks.
This may be a bit [OT] since I don't have any WYSIWYG web page editor to
recommend, but ...
Actually WYSIWYG is VERY BAD fo
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007 15:49:03 -0500
Sam Leon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
> > What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for creating
> > simple web pages, with mostly text, some graphics and pdf, for debian
>
Loeghmon T. Nejad wrote:
What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for creating
simple web pages, with mostly text, some graphics and pdf, for debian
Lenny please? Thanks.
--
Regards,
I would like to know too. I think us html noobs using linux are just
out of luck
What do you recommend as a good, practical WYSIWYG editor for creating
simple web pages, with mostly text, some graphics and pdf, for debian Lenny
please? Thanks.
--
Regards,
On Sat, Mar 30, 2002 at 05:29:30PM +0100, Casper Gielen wrote:
> Klyx is still in the KDE3 CVS, and it compiled just fine for me. However
> it's stuck on version 0.11 . The same as 2 years ago iirc.
Really? I stand corrected; I'll have to go have a look.
-rob
--
I did not vote for the Australi
> KLyX is dead, IIRC. Dead and gone, for now anyway. I seem to
> remember that the originator of the LyX project and the KDE project
> are one and the same. Once KDE hit the big time, he (and maybe
they are
>
> The other problem is that KLyX was only ported to KDE1, so even if you
> could g
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:33:22PM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> > > Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit
> > > are more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered
> > > schemes, headers, footers, inserted image
docs can have hyperlinks,
bookmarks etc.
will admit is takes some effort, but nothing $20 on the
small LaTeX manual by lamport wont solve.
Tom
On Monday 25 March 2002 6:12 am, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents
> I'll edit
> > I'm downloading build 641c right now. I would like to know if there
> > is any issue with installing such a big program which is not a
> > Debian package, regarding future maintenance, upgrade,
> > uninstallation, etc. In the archives I've found some issues with
> > the installation, but alread
Daniel Toffetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit
> > > are more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered
> > > schemes, headers, footers, inserted images and tables, page
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 03:08:36PM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> > Neither Kword or Abiword supports footnotes. For footnotes and
> > WYSIWYG, you can use Lyx or OpenOffice. While OpenOffice has a
> > somewhat strange UI (It was even worse in StarOffice 5.2, which tried
> > to take control over y
> > Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit
> > are more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered
> > schemes, headers, footers, inserted images and tables, page
> > numbers, footnotes, text styles, chapters, TOCs, etc.
>
> > Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit
> > are more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered
> > schemes, headers, footers, inserted images and tables, page
> > numbers, footnotes, text styles, chapters, TOCs, etc.
>
Daniel Toffetti wrote:
Hi !
Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit are
more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered schemes,
headers, footers, inserted images and tables, page numbers, footnotes,
text styles, chapters, TOCs, etc.
So fa
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:12:39AM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit are
> more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered schemes,
> headers, footers, inserted images and tables, pag
ward, for previous
versions the same functionalities are located in the File menu, if I
remember exactly.
Alberto Vecchiato
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit are
> more or less as comple
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:12:39AM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit are
> more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered schemes,
> headers, footers, inserted images and tables, pag
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 02:12:39AM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit are
> more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered schemes,
> headers, footers, inserted images and tables, pag
Hi !
Well, I need a wysiwyg editor a la M$ Word. The documents I'll edit are
more or less as complex as one see in papers, I mean, numbered schemes,
headers, footers, inserted images and tables, page numbers, footnotes,
text styles, chapters, TOCs, etc.
So far I'm trying with Kwor
arching for a simple solution for
> maintaining this site which has about 100 static pages, currently i use a few
> (crude and awfully simple) scripts to automate some of it.
>
If you're wanting to automate page generation using common templates,
databases, etc., I suggest Template Too
William Leese wrote:
>
> On Monday 19 February 2001 16:45, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > > urgh, however.. i still have to use Windows for Dreamweaver, any
> > > suggestions anyone?
> > >
> > > it needs to be a WYSIWYG-editor (till i finally cleanup the
On Monday 19 February 2001 16:45, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> > urgh, however.. i still have to use Windows for Dreamweaver, any
> > suggestions anyone?
> >
> > it needs to be a WYSIWYG-editor (till i finally cleanup the generated
> > code) that handles nested tab
>
> Freshmeat a few days ago had IBM Homepage builder listed..
>
> i've downloaded and toyed with it, it seemed to do stylesheets but i can't
> tell you how well...
>
> also its on an evaluation licence...
-
It uses style sheets and allows sheet
At 11:39 AM 8/20/2000 -0500, John Foster wrote:
>Anyone ever heard or seen any type of WYSIWYG editor for style sheets. I
>want to spped up my web development process and figure this could save
>me a lot of time. I guess actually any tool that would allow me to save
>the sheets in .cs
Anyone ever heard or seen any type of WYSIWYG editor for style sheets. I
want to spped up my web development process and figure this could save
me a lot of time. I guess actually any tool that would allow me to save
the sheets in .css format and use a browser to preview the results would
work. Any
35 matches
Mail list logo
