Re: WARNING: VIRUS ATTACHED TO MESSAGE FROM Alexander Gutfraind

1999-05-10 Thread John Galt
First, it's a trojan, not a virus--get your terminology straight: virii automagically execute and do their damage, trojans need intervention to execute (Melissa virus indeed...). Secondly, as a trojan, you have to execute it on a winbox, so there shouldn't be much problem on a Debian list. Third,

Re: WARNING: VIRUS ATTACHED TO MESSAGE FROM Alexander Gutfraind

1999-05-10 Thread Greg Starkes
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Kenneth Sims wrote: > Why did you (Alexander Gutfraind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) just send a virus > (HAPPY99.EXE) to the debian-user list? He probably didn't realize that he sent it. Happy99 sends itself to everyone that the user sends a message to in the background. The user does

Re: WARNING: VIRUS ATTACHED TO MESSAGE FROM Alexander Gutfraind

1999-05-09 Thread KaHa
Kenneth Sims wrote: > Why did you (Alexander Gutfraind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) just send a > virus (HAPPY99.EXE) to the debian-user list? That's how the "HAPPY99" virus propogates itself; the sender isn't even aware that it's attached. Hey, Ken: get a virus scanner. Or better yet, dump Winblows. :-

WARNING: VIRUS ATTACHED TO MESSAGE FROM Alexander Gutfraind

1999-05-09 Thread Kenneth Sims
Why did you (Alexander Gutfraind <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) just send a virus (HAPPY99.EXE) to the debian-user list? The entire text of the message is attached Ken == X-Persona: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from murphy.debian.org [209.176.56.6] by cc.cumber.edu (SMTPD32-4.07) id A