On Saturday 09 February 2002 11:45 am, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Paul 'Baloo' Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> > > > where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i
> > > > welcome replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at
Paul 'Baloo' Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
>
> > > where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
> > > replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
> > > indicates that they want you to cc: t
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> > where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
> > replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
> > indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some
> > manners--don't do it. especia
On Friday 08 February 2002 04:07 pm, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, ben wrote:
> > where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
> > replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
> > indicates that they want you to cc: to their add
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, ben wrote:
> where did you extract from any part of my post to the list that i welcome
> replies to my address? post it to the list, or not at all. unless someone
> indicates that they want you to cc: to their address, have some
> manners--don't do it. especially, now that you
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 01:07:52 -0500 (EST)
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, csj wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
> > "Jeremy Gaddis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Wouldn't it be nicer if you didn't have to scan email? Email viruses
> > shouldn't exist
Quoting ben <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Friday 08 February 2002 06:33 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> > > And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our
> > > doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar
> > > alarms on our homes? In a p
On Friday 08 February 2002 06:33 am, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> > And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our
> > doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar
> > alarms on our homes? In a perfect world...
>
> I live in a rough part o
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> And wouldn't it be nice if none of us had to lock our
> doors, put bars over our windows, or install burglar
> alarms on our homes? In a perfect world...
I live in a rough part of Portland and I never lock the doors or the car
(and thanks to my roommate
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, csj wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
> "Jeremy Gaddis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Gary,
> >
> > I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups.
> > My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
> > of them) and I have actually never had any pro
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 03:32:59AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
| "Jeremy Gaddis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > Gary,
| >
| > I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups.
| > My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
| > of them) and I have act
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:06:52 -0500
"Jeremy Gaddis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I also run Free Agent, though just for the newsgroups.
> My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
> of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
> it. I do virus scanning on the m
On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 07:42:32PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
| begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation:
|
| > My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
| > of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
| > it.
|
| Except for not being able to read messages like this one?
Or t
begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation:
> My MUA of choice is Outlook (no flames please, I'm tired
> of them) and I have actually never had any problems with
> it.
Except for not being able to read messages like this one?
Craig
ty
of attachments (.doc, .vbs, etc.) it isn't too much to
worry about.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Gary Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 11:20 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 4:19 pm, Gary Turner wrote:
> May I suggest Forte' Agent for mail on a Win box? It is text based,
> will let you inspect attachments/html in raw form, and will warn and
> query you should you try to open an executable. I
On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 09:18:44 +0100, Chris Mueller wrote:
>At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
>>Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
>>I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook,
...
>
>For your own advantage
>you should close Outlook - for ever.
>And switch
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> SSH over TCP/IP over HTTP (with at least one proxy involved) over TCP/IP
> isn't going to be fast, but it may well be workable ...
I used to do this when some moron MCSE blocked close to all the ports,
severely limiting my ability to get my job done
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:46:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company
> I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything
> out without authenticating using an NT account. :(
Have a look at httptunnel
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:46:47AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Personally, I'd love to be able to SSH out to my home box, but the company
> I'm in have an MS Proxy server blocking the way and it won't let anything
> out without authenticating using an NT account. :(
The funny thing is that i
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
> No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some
> time.
Used to have the email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and my tech IDs were
4263G and 6918B, before and after the Beaverton office moved.
> You can't claim that he didn't see what he saw. You did no
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
> You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that?
Being a recovering bob does that.
--
Baloo
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 09:00:49PM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
| On February 01, 2002 at 6:38 PM Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote :
| You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that?
No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some
time. You can't claim that he didn't see what he
You're a fucking arrogant bastard, you know that?
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Paul 'Baloo' Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 6:38 PM
To: Craig Dickson
Cc: debian-user list
Subject: Re: W3
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Craig Dickson wrote:
> > Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more
> > common sense than the average Outlook user.
>
> I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves.
Having to do tech support on that godforsaken product has taught me t
begin Jeremy Gaddis quotation:
> Viruses aren't a problem as I like to think I have a bit more
> common sense than the average Outlook user.
I expect at least 90% of Outlook users think the same of themselves.
> You might notice the
> "X-Scanner:" header in my e-mail messages. All incoming an
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 05:16:09AM -0500, Jeremy Gaddis wrote:
| I used to use Eudora as my main MUA, but I find that Outlook
| meets my needs better. Outlook isn't *just* an MUA, it also
| has a calendar, a task scheduler, a journal, etc. (all of which
| I use, actually). Since I'm going to use
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
> For your own advantage
> you should close Outlook - for ever.
> And switch to Eudora.
> Under Win oder Mac.
Non-optimal. Adware doesn't even qualify as non-free in my book.
--
Baloo
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
> Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
> I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
> server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}?
Preferrably for all your email.
> the job better. On the same note, I r
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, csj wrote:
> Maybe Passport will solve it for him.
And we all know how secure that is...
--
Baloo
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> > | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
> [snip]
> > | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe
> > |
> > | Before this bob took a better
02 3:19 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Cc: Jeremy L. Gaddis
Subject: RE: W32/Myparty
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
>Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
>I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
>server and read th
* Chris Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 03:20]:
[...]
> For your own advantage you should close Outlook - for ever. And switch
> to Eudora. Under Win oder Mac.
Or TheBat! (cheaper and more of a power users' Winblows MUA.)
--
Brian Clark | Debian GNU/Linux: 3950 packages to keep you b
At 00:11 -0500 01.02.2002, Jeremy L. Gaddis wrote:
Are you saying that when I decide to read the debian-* lists
I'm subscribed to, I should close Outlook, SSH to the mail
server and read them using {elm|mutt|pine|other_mda}? Like
anything else, it comes down to what you like best and what
does t
At 14:09 -0800 31.01.2002, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by the antichrist?
Well - I never considered Apple as antichrist
;-)
I am mailing on a Mac.
It's easier, less time consuming - and safer:
- no m
On Thursday 31 January 2002 09:17 pm, Brian Clark wrote:
> * Jeremy L. Gaddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:13]:
>
> [...]
>
> > On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop machines because, at
> > this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far as desktops go.
>
> Let the worms runneth over.
>
>
* Jeremy L. Gaddis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Feb 01. 2002 00:13]:
[...]
> On the same note, I run Windows on my desktop machines because, at
> this time, Linux, IMO, sucks ass as far as desktops go.
Let the worms runneth over.
On your mark, get set, go!
*Pulling the fire alarm*
--
Brian Clark | De
Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:09 PM
To: Chris Mueller
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
> 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
> all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If
n files.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: allen wayne best just ramblin in his amx
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 9:37 PM
To: Debian User Mailing List
Subject: Re: W32/Myparty
all:
see
http://www.infoworld.com/ar
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:20:43 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> | > | On Fri, 1 Feb
all:
see http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/09/10/010910oplivingston.xml
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:30, dman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote:
> | On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST)
> |
> | "Paul 'Baloo' Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | > On T
On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 10:34:25AM +0800, csj wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST)
| "Paul 'Baloo' Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
| >
| > > Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to
| > > concentrate on security fr
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:15:34 -0800 (PST)
"Paul 'Baloo' Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
>
> > Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate
> > on security from now on...
>
> Do you honestly believe it's more than the sam
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 05:46:12PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| > | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
| [snip]
| > | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 17:50:35 -0500 dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> | On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
[snip]
> | http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe
> |
> | Before this bob took a better job as a sec
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:15, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
> > Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to
> > concentrate on security from now on...
>
> Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as
> before
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, John Cichy wrote:
> Yes, but we might have to be more careful now, billy is going to concentrate
> on security from now on...
Do you honestly believe it's more than the same bullshit lipservice as
before?
--
Baloo
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:02, benfoley wrote:
> On Thursday 31 January 2002 08:00 am, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
> > At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote:
> > >Chris Mueller wrote:
> > >>Hi,
> > >>7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
On Thursday 31 January 2002 08:00 am, Geoff Beaumont wrote:
> At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote:
> >Chris Mueller wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
> >>all of them from linux-mailinglists.
> >
> >How many
On Thu, Jan 31, 2002 at 02:26:52PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
| On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
|
| > >This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
| > >are you using software by the antichrist?
| > >
| >
| > You might have heard of a little thing calle
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, John Griffiths wrote:
> >This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
> >are you using software by the antichrist?
> >
>
> You might have heard of a little thing called work
http://ursine.dyndns.org/~baloo/software/putty.exe
Before this bob took a b
On Thursday 31 January 2002 18:09 pm, John Griffiths wrote:
> At 02:09 PM 1/31/02 -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
> >On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
> >> all of them fro
At 02:09 PM 1/31/02 -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote:
>On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
>> all of them from linux-mailinglists.
>
>This makes no sense to me. If you're on
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Chris Mueller wrote:
> Hi,
> 7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
> all of them from linux-mailinglists.
This makes no sense to me. If you're on a Linux mailing list, just why
are you using software by the antichrist?
--
Baloo
At 16:01 31/01/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a
slave to bill...
How many of us are reading this email on a
Chris Mueller wrote:
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
How many harmed your debian system ? 0 ? Ahh, the wonders of not being a
slave to bill...
:-(
Chris
--
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL
Hi,
7 mails with virus W32/Myparty got into my inbox -
all of them from linux-mailinglists.
:-(
Chris
--
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Received: from HOST (minh.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.234.72])
by mailrelay.jaist.ac.jp (3.7W-mailrelay) ...;
Tue, 29 Jan
57 matches
Mail list logo
