On 2009-07-16_01:08:08, lee wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 07:57:36PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
>
> > Meaning that all packets come to and back from - only for/from the
> > v-server. That the home machine will not be processing the packets.
>
> In a way, that isn't possible because there has to
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 07:57:36PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Meaning that all packets come to and back from - only for/from the
> v-server. That the home machine will not be processing the packets.
In a way, that isn't possible because there has to be at least one
physical network card which wou
Thank You for Your time and answer, lee:
> Unplugging the network connection is the best way to achieve that.
How will v-server will get network then?
> > - but only affecting those in vserver.
> ?
Meaning that all packets come to and back from - only for/from the v-server.
That the home mach
On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 09:23:13PM +0700, Sthu Deus wrote:
> Good day.
>
> I want to make a well closed machine running vservers - that is I want to make
> such a forwarding that any communications will be off the machine (for the
> security reasons)
Unplugging the network connection is the best
Good day.
I want to make a well closed machine running vservers - that is I want to make
such a forwarding that any communications will be off the machine (for the
security reasons)
- but only affecting those in vserver.
Thus far I have on real machine:
*filter
:INPUT ACCEPT
:FORWARD DROP
:OUTPU
5 matches
Mail list logo