hat I can't rely on all client PCs having up-to-date
virus scanner software, so this measure would be some kind of safety
net.
>Instead protect your Linux with things like
> rkhunter.
Thanks for that hint. I will take it into account.
>
> Also all your windows PCs already have to
Holger Rauch wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
Holger Rauch wrote:
I'm thinking about using NOD32 on a Debian system for on access virus
scanning (i.e. scan a file when it's created or its contents are
modified in some way).
Why, when it's so much easier to not allow conne
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Holger Rauch wrote:
>
> > I'm thinking about using NOD32 on a Debian system for on access virus
> > scanning (i.e. scan a file when it's created or its contents are
> > modified in some way).
>
> Why, when it's so much easier to not allow connectio
Holger Rauch wrote:
> I'm thinking about using NOD32 on a Debian system for on access virus
> scanning (i.e. scan a file when it's created or its contents are
> modified in some way).
Why, when it's so much easier to not allow connections from insecure
operating systems prone to virus infection t
Rehi,
please see my answers below.
On Wed, 25 Nov 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Why is that a problem? Do you have Windows clients accessing the system
> > > through NFS?
> >
> > Not necessarily, but I'd like to be on the safe side.
>
> On what safe side?
>
> Can you give an e
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 10:26:12AM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
>
> > [...]
> > Why is that a problem? Do you have Windows clients accessing the system
> > through NFS?
>
> Not necessarily, but I'd like to be on the safe side.
On what safe side
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Nov 2009, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> [...]
> Why is that a problem? Do you have Windows clients accessing the system
> through NFS?
Not necessarily, but I'd like to be on the safe side. Furthermore,
there seem to be many Dazuko versions around:
- dazuko-source_2.3.3-1_all.deb
- dazuk
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 12:49:38PM +0100, Holger Rauch wrote:
> Hi to everybody,
>
> I'm thinking about using NOD32 on a Debian Lenny system for on
> access virus scanning (i.e. scan a file when it's created and/or its
> contents are modified in some way).
>
> I'm aware that there's the Dazuko mo
o module, but allegedly it doesn't
> seem to support NFSv3 or NFSv4 file systems since NFS uses socket
> communication to write files not "ordinary" file system calls and
> Dazuko can only intercept these.
>
> So, my questions are:
>
> - Which virus scanner capa
Sv3 or NFSv4 file systems since NFS uses socket
communication to write files not "ordinary" file system calls and
Dazuko can only intercept these.
So, my questions are:
- Which virus scanner capable of performing on acces scanning would
you recommend for a central file server running D
v4 file systems since NFS uses socket
communication to write files not "ordinary" file system calls and
Dazuko can only handle these.
So, my questions are:
- Which virus scanner would you recommend for a central file server
running Debian Lenny offering FTP, OpenAFS, NFSv4 and SSH/SCP a
Please contact your local system administrator, and ask for a virus scan of your
local machine.
The infected file attachment in the scanned document was deleted.
Virus Information:
The attachment .xx.pif contained the virus [EMAIL PROTECTED] and was deleted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 09:17:19PM -0800, Raquel Rice wrote:
> Oh gosh! Can you sense that I'm more than a bit nervous about
> getting rid of Sendmail and installing Exim? Is it going to be a
> giant job?
Does 20 minutes sound like a giant job?
- -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:45:38PM -0500, BruceG wrote:
> If you decide to go with exim4-heavy-daemon, there is a great tutorial on
> getting SpamAssassin going here :http://ursine.ca/~baloo/clamd-exiscan.txt
No, no, you can use dman's spamassassin so
[posted and mailed]
On 12 Dec 2003, Raquel Rice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
linux.debian.user:
> Oh gosh! Can you sense that I'm more than a bit nervous about
> getting rid of Sendmail and installing Exim? Is it going to be a
> giant job?
Well, I went for postfix over Exim but it went like th
- Original Message -
From: "Raquel Rice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I have ClamAV running, just checking files. The documentation which
> comes with it says that it shouldn't be run to check email. Is this
> real?
>
> So, I went and got Amavis-ng ... but it wouldn't set up properly to
> sc
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 03:19:44AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> > enough to contain the axioms of arithmetic, then there are statements
> > which can be made but not proved within that system. It is possible to
> > add further axi
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> enough to contain the axioms of arithmetic, then there are statements
> which can be made but not proved within that system. It is possible to
> add further axioms to prove the statements, but then this richer
> axiomatic base will lea
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 10:19:28AM -0800, Deryk Barker wrote:
> Thus spake Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> ...
> > I thought it was neither complete (the doesn't capture all truths thing)
> > nor consistent (may contain both a statement and its complement)[1].
> > But I can look that up.
> >
> > The S
Thus spake Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
...
> I thought it was neither complete (the doesn't capture all truths thing)
> nor consistent (may contain both a statement and its complement)[1].
> But I can look that up.
>
> The Stanford prof told me the Lambda calculus (Lisp-ish stuff) almost
> proved o
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:07:18AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:01:16AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > >
> > > > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system the
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 07:01:16AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> >
> > > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> > > it won't grind out falsehoods ...
>
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 09:27:37AM -0500, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
>
> > ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> > it won't grind out falsehoods ...
>
> But Goedel's Theorem actually says that in any formal system
On Sun, Nov 30, 2003 at 12:00:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> ... that in any sufficiently complex formal system there are no guarantees
> it won't grind out falsehoods ...
But Goedel's Theorem actually says that in any formal system, there will be
true propositions that cannot be proved (without going
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 11:19:37PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> and you weren't in it for the $$$ ??
> (just that bugs and exploits exists? )
When I learned about Godel's work I really freaked out.
When I learned there are certain true statements which are not
expressible by manipulation of symbo
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Tom wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:55:59AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> > On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 04:34:43 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Bernstein pays $500 for each verifiable security hole in qmail.
> > > Following the same premise as for Knuth, you shoul
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 11:34:43 -0800, Tom wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:55:59AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 04:34:43 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Bernstein pays $500 for each verifiable security hole in qmail.
>> > Following the same premise as for Knuth, y
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 09:55:59AM -0500, Paul Morgan wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 04:34:43 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> >
> > Bernstein pays $500 for each verifiable security hole in qmail.
> > Following the same premise as for Knuth, you should find this a
> > similarly lucrative opportuni
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 04:34:43 -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Bernstein pays $500 for each verifiable security hole in qmail.
> Following the same premise as for Knuth, you should find this a
> similarly lucrative opportunity. You might find the page detailing this
> offer of interest:
>
>
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:41:47AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > Bernstein pays $500 for each verifiable security hole in qmail.
> > Following the same premise as for Knuth, you should find this a
> > similarly lucrative opportunity. You might find the page detailing this
> > offer of interest:
>
> Touc
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 04:34:43AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 02:08:37AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:54:38AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >
> > > on Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:19:43AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
on Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 02:08:37AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:54:38AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> > on Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:19:43AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > [snip everybody]
> > > I have this belief that for any arbitrary large
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, Tom wrote:
...
> > > I have this belief that for any arbitrary large block of code, the #
of
> > > undiscovered root exploits to be very large (I actually beleve the # to
> > > be limitless -- humans are infinitely clever).
> >
> > I have this belief that the moon is mad
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 02:08:37AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > Again: you're displaying gross ignorance of this topic. Inform
> > yourself before you seek to inform others.
The basis for my credulity is The Undedcidability Theorem.
Read "The Illusion of Technique" by Barrett. European mathematicians
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:54:38AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> on Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:19:43AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > [snip everybody]
> >
> > Hey, the Debian folks themselves say there is the possibility of an
> > unknown root exploit in the wild.
>
> Yes. Which is v
on Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:19:43AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [snip everybody]
>
> Hey, the Debian folks themselves say there is the possibility of an
> unknown root exploit in the wild.
Yes. Which is very likely fully independent of the OS on which the code
lives. In other words,
[snip everybody]
Hey, the Debian folks themselves say there is the possibility of an
unknown root exploit in the wild.
I have this belief that for any arbitrary large block of code, the # of
undiscovered root exploits to be very large (I actually beleve the # to
be limitless -- humans are infi
- Original Message -
From: "Alvin Oga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Debian-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 04:53
Subject: freebsd - Re: recommended Virus Scanner?
> On Thu, 27 Nov
Monique Y. Herman wrote:
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 at 02:27 GMT, Alvin Oga penned:
- best way is to disallow all mime attachements.. even windoze
users... but guess the ceo and managers like to pass excel
attachments to each other which they can do locally thru their local
mail server ..
The le
Karsten M. Self wrote:
Incidentally, which was it?
Linux/OSF-8759.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
---+--
on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 10:59:50PM -0800, Steve Lamb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
> >I think that many do. I think your fears are somewhat misplaced.
>
> >The advice is still valid.
>
> I think why some of us have taken such exception to Paul's flippant
> reply is because
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Tom wrote:
> I have a friend who is 1000 times smarter about Unix than me, and he has
> told me the whole history of Sendmail exploits, Bind exploits, and
> horriblly crufty design decisions and gaffs and el crapo code all
> throughout the history of Unix. His personal op
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:06:54 -0800
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:33:45PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:57:26PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> > > I've gotta say that md5-encrypted shadow passwords, chkrootkit,
> > > integrit, SYN cookies, iptab
to be crow one
> day we will all eat.
... and having digested that, we'll move on the better for it. I think
your basic premise is flawed, that Linux is claimed to be perfect and
immune from exploits.
On the subject (Re: recommended Virus Scanner?), I recently included one
in my .procm
on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 06:57:18AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 05:39:05AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Thanks for the excellent answers.
>
> > ...you don't need to worry about viruses for GNU/Linux.
>
> >GNU/Linux has a security profile. It's general
Karsten M. Self wrote:
I think that many do. I think your fears are somewhat misplaced.
The advice is still valid.
I think why some of us have taken such exception to Paul's flippant reply
is because this is debian-user, not debian-guru. We do have people here who
are Debian, linux and/or
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 09:33:45PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:57:26PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> > I've gotta say that md5-encrypted shadow passwords, chkrootkit,
> > integrit, SYN cookies, iptables, etc. don't really look like the
> > products of a "can't happen here"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 11:57:26PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> I've gotta say that md5-encrypted shadow passwords, chkrootkit,
> integrit, SYN cookies, iptables, etc. don't really look like the
> products of a "can't happen here" mentality.
On the cont
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:53:31AM +0800, David Palmer. wrote:
> Hello Tom,
>
> With all due respect to your friend, if he knew what he was talking
> about regarding Unix security, he wouldn't be using Free, he'd be using
> Open.
His comments about Unix security were about commercial and historic
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 at 02:27 GMT, Alvin Oga penned:
>
> - best way is to disallow all mime attachements.. even windoze
> users... but guess the ceo and managers like to pass excel
> attachments to each other which they can do locally thru their local
> mail server ..
The lead on my latest projec
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 06:57:18 -0800
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 05:39:05AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> Thanks for the excellent answers.
>
> > ...you don't need to worry about viruses for GNU/Linux.
>
> >GNU/Linux has a security profile. It's generally mar
e amavis-ng package from Debian/sarge, which a wraps most of the virus
scanners that run natively on Linux.
I use the fsavp script because I prefer my virus scanner to work like
SpamAssassin, it just inserts a header into messages that I can process
with regular tools.
> Thanks for the valuab
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:09:11PM -0800 or thereabouts, Darik Horn wrote:
Hi Darik,
> ClamAV is the best virus scanner that is free software. On a
> Debian/woody computer, you should use a backport of a recent version
> like this:
How does one run it properly with Exim? I had it sc
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:07:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > It's only going to get worse as Linux gets more popular.
>
> They've had ten plus years. If it was going to happen, it would have
> happened.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 05:39:05AM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Thanks for the excellent answers.
> ...you don't need to worry about viruses for GNU/Linux.
>GNU/Linux has a security profile. It's generally markedly different
>from legacy MS Windows.
>I don't think viruses and worm
on Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:07:05AM -0800, Tom ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >Non-issue if you don't use Windows.
>
> This is totally piling on, but given this recent security compromise,
> I think the whole Linux community needs to reevaluate its "can't
> happen here" ment
I use qmail + qmail-scanner + mcafee and it is working for a long time
with any problem.
Gilberto
Em Wed, 19 Nov 2003 12:55:52 -0500
Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> Hello:
>
> What virus scanner is the choice for most Debian users? I'm using Woody,
> and r
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, David Palmer. wrote:
...
> Novell is offering financial enticement, depending on the project, up to
> $2500.00 for moving the Gaim buddy list over to Evolution, so they are
> obviously going after the desktop market, and the competition factor is
> going to be up there.
hum
hi ya stephen
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, Stephen wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:16:12PM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:55:52PM -0500, Stephen wrote:
> > > What virus scanner is the choice for most Debian users? I'm using Woody
ClamAV is the best virus scanner that is free software. On a
Debian/woody computer, you should use a backport of a recent version
like this:
http://www.backports.org/debian/dists/woody/clamav/
If you wish to purchase a commercial product, then I would recommend
F-Secure Anti-Virus for Linux
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:07:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >Non-issue if you don't use Windows.
As things stand right now, this is essentially true. There is the
occasional virus for Linux out there, but they are _exceedingly_ rare.
This may change. If it does, then virus-sc
What antivirus scanner available in Debian Woody, do you learned folks
recommend? I'm running Exim to a smarthost, with local delivery with
Fetchmail/Procmail etc.
Thanks. Please cc, as I'm not subscribed to the list with this address.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Paul Johnson wrote:
They don't live very long, or are they very numerous. I believe the
current number of viruses for Linux in the wild that haven't died out
is somewhere around zero right now.
This incident was last month. You're operating under the presumption
that a virus, once defeated,
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 06:45:49AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:07:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> > It's only going to get worse as Linux gets more popular.
>
> They've had ten plus years. If it was going to happen, it would have
> happened.
That's Argumentum ad antiquitatem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 12:07:05AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> It's only going to get worse as Linux gets more popular.
They've had ten plus years. If it was going to happen, it would have
happened.
> I think all Linux devs, from Linus on down, need to stop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 11:48:12PM -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Not true. I have seen a Linux virus in the wild.
They don't live very long, or are they very numerous. I believe the
current number of viruses for Linux in the wild that haven't died
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 00:07:05 -0800
Tom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> > >Non-issue if you don't use Windows.
>
> This is totally piling on, but given this recent security compromise,
> I think the whole Linux community needs to reevaluate its "can't
> happen here" mentality.
> Paul Johnson wrote:
> >Non-issue if you don't use Windows.
This is totally piling on, but given this recent security compromise, I
think the whole Linux community needs to reevaluate its "can't happen
here" mentality. I don't care if its social engineering or I-Love-You,
if the world comes t
Paul Johnson wrote:
Non-issue if you don't use Windows.
Not true. I have seen a Linux virus in the wild. Further more just
because one doesn't use Windows does not mean that they don't use other
possible vectors. There's a very old addage for this, maybe you've heard of
it? "Better safe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:37:58PM -0500, Stephen wrote:
> Yeah sure, so YOU say. I use a Debian box to serve mail to windoze users.
>
> Thanks for your wisdom.
Oh, in that case, if you had read the list archives, you would have
found...
http://ursin
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 06:27:46PM -0800 or thereabouts, Alvin Oga wrote:
>
> hi ya stephen
Howdy
> more importantly...
> - which antivirus sw works and how much for it and how much effort
> to admin it ... and does it work .. and what slips by
>
> - list of antivirus apps
>
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:16:12PM -0800 or thereabouts, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:55:52PM -0500, Stephen wrote:
> > What virus scanner is the choice for most Debian users? I'm using Woody,
> > and rather than download and install several, I would lik
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 12:55:52PM -0500, Stephen wrote:
> What virus scanner is the choice for most Debian users? I'm using Woody,
> and rather than download and install several, I would like to have
> actual user feedback, on the pr
Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hello:
>
> What virus scanner is the choice for most Debian users? I'm using Woody,
> and rather than download and install several, I would like to have
> actual user feedback, on the pros/cons of any/either.
>
> Thank-you.
Hello:
What virus scanner is the choice for most Debian users? I'm using Woody,
and rather than download and install several, I would like to have
actual user feedback, on the pros/cons of any/either.
Thank-you.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
> Does anyone know an exim virus scanner for debian?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache search email virus scanner spam
mailscanner - An email virus scanner and spam tagger.
The Debian package are rather old versions (3.13 and 3.27) compared to the
current version (4.22-5). I download and inst
No wait, now I can see it :) hehe.
--
Thank you,
Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-Original Message-
From: Nick Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exim virus scanner?
Hi,
* Louie Miranda <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
* Louie Miranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030711 13:59]:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know an exim virus scanner for debian?
Yes, apt-cache does:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ 17% apt-cache search exim virus
amavis-ng - AMaViS "Next Generation"
amavisd-new - Interface between MTA
I did not see your search on my box. Just the amavis-postfix.
--
Thank you,
Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-Original Message-
From: Steve Lamb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Exim virus scanner?
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003
check out clamav .. its in testing
- Original Message -
From: "Louie Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:27 AM
Subject: Exim virus scanner?
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know an exim virus scanner for debian
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 12:57:22 +0800
"Louie Miranda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know an exim virus scanner for debian?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# apt-cache search exim virus
amavis-postfix - Interface between MTA and virus scanner.
amavisd-new - Interface between MT
Hello,
Does anyone know an exim virus scanner for debian?
--
Thank you,
Louie Miranda ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 08:30:16AM -, Kevin Smith wrote:
> I've had a look at the SpamAssassin which for some reason does not start
> using the init.d scripts that come with DEB package using apt-get
> install spamassassin.
You need to enable it. See /usr/share/doc/spamassassin/README.Debian,
Hi All,
I'm running Debian 3.0r1 PowerPC and want to find a decent virus scanner
for qmail, whether it be commercial or open source software. However,
it needs to run on a PowerPC (Apple G3 beige).
I've had a look at the SpamAssassin which for some reason does not start
using the init
I have use uvscan for a wile and it works, rather haevy but do his job, you
could try f-prot dough it's much lighter and there is a free version on the
f-prot site.
Cheers,
rak
On Mon, Dec 30, 2002 at 01:47:58PM -0500, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to install some vi
you can try CLAMAV
http://clamav.elektrapro.com/
Ray
Vivek Kumar wrote:
Hi,
I need to install some virus scanner on my linux boxes. Can you help me
with the available products..
Thanks
Vkumar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
hi ya
On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Vivek Kumar wrote:
> I need to install some virus scanner on my linux boxes. Can you help me
> with the available products..
pick one-two-three from the list
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/AntiVirus
c ya
alvin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
Hi,
I need to install some virus scanner on my linux boxes. Can you help me
with the available products..
Thanks
Vkumar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hi ya theodore...
> With the Nimba virus/worm and the Code Red worm breaking Windows around the
> globe, I am nervously waiting for the next Linux Worm.
why ??? in the mean time... the script kiddies...with lots of free tme is
attacking your PCs with generic scripts that tries to exploit your
>also sprach Dave Sherohman (on Mon, 01 Oct 2001 04:22:04PM -0500):
>> The only virus scanners I am aware of that run under linux are
>> designed to scan for Windows viruses in traffic that the linux server
>> is handling.
McAfee's (NAI) searches for Windows and Unix variants. From the Virus DAT
u
also sprach Dave Sherohman (on Mon, 01 Oct 2001 04:22:04PM -0500):
> The only virus scanners I am aware of that run under linux are
> designed to scan for Windows viruses in traffic that the linux server
> is handling.
are there any that can interface with postfix packaged as debian? i
can't find
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 01:51:31PM -0400, Theodore Knab wrote:
> What is being done to protect against this ?
apt-get and security.debian.org. When a new exploit is announced,
security.debian.org almost always has an updated deb available within
a day and this update is announced on the debian-an
ld have to take care creating 2 programs as opposed to
> one.
>
> What is being done to protect against this ? Are there any Linux
> virus/ worm scanners for Debian?
I don't see much of a use for such a thing. In the windows world, a
virus scanner is merely a program that sear
Hi all,
With the Nimba virus/worm and the Code Red worm breaking Windows around the
globe, I am nervously waiting for the next Linux Worm.
It would be more work to make a Linux virus or worm because the designer would
have to take care creating 2 programs as opposed to one.
What is being done
Title: Nachricht
Hello
i am using debian
potato with postfix. I like to implement a virus scanner on the mail server. do
you have any recommendations ?
thanks in
advance
tim
> "tim.tim.tim" wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> i am using debian potato with postfix. I like to implement a virus
> scanner on the mail server. do you have any recommendations ?
>
>
> thanks in advance
>
>
> tim
>From your e-mail adress I asume you&
>
> > Hello
> >
> > i am using debian potato with postfix. I like to implement a virus
> > scanner on the mail server. do you have any recommendations ?
> >
> >
> > thanks in advance
> >
> >
> > tim
>
>
> >From y
> Is there a virus scanner available for linux that I can use to scan mails,
> downloads etc. before they even reach M$ systems?
There is a native Linux anti-virus program called AVP which I seem to
recall will do exactly this (with that said, I might be mistaken though:-).
You can reac
Hi Michael,
> Is there a virus scanner available for linux that I can use to scan mails,
> downloads etc. before they even reach M$ systems?
I am using AntiVir (www.antivir.de) which is free for private use, but
there are Linux versions of McAfee, Sophos, KasperskyLab and more. A good
ov
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 06:37:18PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> Is there a virus scanner available for linux that I can use to scan mails,
> downloads etc. before they even reach M$ systems?
Check out http://www.datafellows.com or http://www.mcafee.com
They both sell linux-versions th
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
